Respect the technique: Status-based respect increases minority group social cohesion with majority groups, while also increasing minority collective action tendencies

References

• Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, A. B., Charlton, K., Dorr, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self; On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. (2011). An integrated conceptual model of respect in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 316–327. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejducie with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800–814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., Kerr, P., & Thomae, M. (2013). ‘What’s so funny ‘bout peace, love, and understanding?’ Further reflections on the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 239–252. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.234
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. A., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(6), 411–425. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. A., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2010). ‘Let them eat harmony’: Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 76–80. doi:10.1177/0963721410363366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2000). Group identity and intergroup relations The common in-group identity model. Advances in Group Processes, 17, 1–35. doi:10.1016/S0882-6145(00)17002-X
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296–330. doi:10.1080/10463280701726132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibach, R. P., & Keegan, T. (2006). Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and white and black Americans’ differing assessments of racial progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 453–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasford, D. E., & Calcagno, J. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 323–328. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasford, D. E., & Dovidio, J. F. (2011). E pluribus unum: Dual identity and minority group members’ motivation to engage in contact, as well as social change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 1021–1024. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, A., Dovidio, J. F., Huici, C., Gaertner, S. L., & Cuadrado, I. (2008). The other side of we: When outgroup members express common identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1613–1626. doi:10.1177/0146167208323600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, R., Rebelo, M., Monteiro, M. B., Riek, B. M., Maia, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 445–460. doi:10.1177/1368430209355651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halabi, S., Dovidio, J. F., & Nadler, A. (2016). Help that hurts? Perceptions of intergroup assistance. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 53, 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1469–1479. doi:10.1177/01461672012711008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subgroup differentiation as a response to an overly-inclusive group: A test of optimal distinctiveness theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 543–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice-reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242–256. doi:10.1177/0146167200264010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., & Binning, K. R. (2008). Why the psychological experience of respect matters in group life: An integrative account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1570–1585. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00129.x
   Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., Binning, K. R., & Molina, L. E. (2010). Testing and integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 200–212. doi:10.1177/0146167209356787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., & Molina, L. E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 359–376. doi:10.1177/1368430206064639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardelli, G. J., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and Why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468–485. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, A. G., Spears, R., Manstead, A. S. R., & Bruder, M. (2009). Illegitimacy and identity threat in (inter) action: Predicting intergroup orientations among minority group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 755–775. doi:10.1348/014466608X39859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummendey, A., Klink, A., Mielke, R., Wenzel, M., & Blanz, M. (1999). Socio-structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: Results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 259–285. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reysen, S., Slobodnikova, A., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2016). Ineraction of socio-structural characteristics to predict Roma’s identification and desire to challenge low status position. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 428–434. doi:10.1111/jasp.12373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1021–1030. doi:10.1177/0146167209336610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (2007). Respect, equality, and power: A social psychological perspective. Gruppendynamik Und Organisationsberatung, 38(3), 309–326. doi:10.1007/s11612-007-0027-2
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B., & Grabow, H. (2014). To be respected and to respect: The challenge of mutual respect in intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 39–53. doi:10.1111/bjso.12019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B., Lücken, M., & Stürmer, S. (2006). The added value of respect: Reaching across inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 535–546. doi:10.1348/014466605X57637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B., Mommert, A., & Renger, D. (2015). Reaching across group boundaries: Respect from outgroup members facilitates recategorization as a common group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. doi:10.1111/bjso.12112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, R., Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Branscombe, N. (2006). The individual within the group: Respect! In T. Postmes & J. Jolanda (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 175–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Subasic, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352. doi:10.1177/1088868308323223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16(12), 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. N., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 129–142. doi:10.1348/014466609X419901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. K. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of social self. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik Und Organisationsberatung, 38(2), 185–200. doi:10.1007/s11612-007-0015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M. (2006). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 148–184. doi:10.1080/10463280600937418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. B., & Langer, E. J. (1999). Horizontal hostility: Relations between similar minority groups. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 537–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., Giguere, B., Branscombe, N. R., & McVicar, D. N. (2011). One day we might be no more: Collective angst and protective action from potential distinctiveness loss. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 289–300. doi:10.1002/ejsp.773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsko, C., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 635–654. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J. P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yogeeswaran, K., Dasgupta, N., & Gomez, C. (2012). A new American dilemma? The effect of ethnic identification and public service on the national inclusion of ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 691–705. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar