Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation

References

• Banuazizi, A., & Movahedi, S. (1975). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. American Psychologist, 30, 152–160. doi:10.1037/h0076835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyard, P. (2007). Tyranny and the tyrant: FROM STANFORD to Abu Ghraib. [Review of the book The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil, by P. G. Zimbardo]. The Psychologist, 20, 494–495.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 209–219. doi:10.1177/0146167211432763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnahan, T., & McFarland, S. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 603–614. doi:10.1177/0146167206292689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. (2013, October 18). Why Zimbardo’s prison experiment isn’t in my textbook [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201310/why-zimbardo-s-prison-experiment-isn-t-in-my-textbook
   Google Scholar
• Haney, C., Banks, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2007). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 615–622. doi:10.1177/0146167206298570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2012). Contesting the “nature” of conformity. What Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show. Plos Biology, 10, e1001426.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2017). Tyranny: Revisiting Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment. In J. R. Smith & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), Social psychology: Revisiting the classic studies (2nd ed., pp. 130–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., & Millard, K. (2015). Shock treatment: Using immersive digital realism to restage and re-examine Milgram’s “obedience to authority” research. PloS one, 10, e109015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., & Van Bavel, J. J. (in press). Brutality is not a product of ‘natural’ conformity to role: Uncovering the role of identity leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment. The American Psychologist.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2018, June 30). Doing ill for 'the greater good': Understanding what really went on in the Stanford prison experiment. The Inquisitive Mind. Retrieved from http://www.in-mind.org/blog/post/doing-ill-for-the-greater-good-understanding-what-really-went-on-in-the-stanford-prison
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, D. E. (1974). The effect of the research expectancy on the activity level of institutionalized delinquents. Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 242–247. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6629
   Google Scholar
• Le Texier, T. (in press). Debunking the Stanford prison experiment. The American Psychologist.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge, J., de Bruin, M., & Witton, J. (2012). The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: A systematic review. PloS one, 7, e39116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, S., & Carnahan, T. (2009). A situation’s first powers are attracting volunteers and selecting participants: A reply to Haney and Zimbardo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 815–818. doi:10.1177/0146167209334781
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22, 276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarick, D. J. (2004). Analysis of impulsive choice: Assessing effects of implicit instructions. The Psychological Record, 54, 505–522. doi:10.1007/BF03395489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarick, D. J. (2007). Attenuation and enhancement of compliance with experimental demand characteristics. The Psychological Record, 57, 501–515. doi:10.1007/BF03395590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, A. L., & Maner, J. K. (2008). The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. Journal of General Psychology, 135, 151–165. doi:10.3200/GENP.135.2.151-166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783. doi:10.1037/h0043424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T., & Whitehouse, W. G. (2000). Demand characteristics. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 469–470). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1–40. doi:10.1348/014466605X48998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. G. (1975). Detecting demand characteristics in laboratory experiments in consumer research: The case of repetition-affect research. In M. J. Schlinger (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 2, pp. 713–724). Ann Abor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, I., & Shulman, A. D. (1970). A conceptual model of artifact in attitude change studies. Sociometry, 33, 97–107. doi:10.2307/2786274
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. A., Saayman, G. S., & Touyz, S. W. (1978). A methodological study of the effect of experimentally induced demand characteristics in research on nocturnal dreams. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 459–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (1971, August 14). Tape F [sound recording-nonmusical], Philip G. Zimbardo Papers (SC0750). Stanford, CA: Department of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar