The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters

References

• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asbrock, F., Christ, O., Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Differential effects of intergroup contact for authoritarians and social dominators: A dual process model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 477–490. doi:10.1177/0146167211429747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbrock, F., Gutenbrunner, L., & Wagner, U. (2013). Unwilling, but not unaffected: Imagined contact effects for authoritarians and social dominators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 404–412. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340. doi:10.1002/per.746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, F. K., Louis, W. R., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 389–405. doi:10.1348/014466608X387089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohrs, J. C., & Ibler, S. (2009). Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 81–94. doi:10.1080/01973530802659638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, A. H., Gelder, M. G., Rix, S., Meltzer, H. I., & Rowlands, O. J. (2000). Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(1), 4–7. doi:10.1192/bjp.177.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 223–237. doi:10.1177/1368430210391121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Love, A., Schellhaas, F. M., & Hewstone, M. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 606–620. doi:10.1177/1368430217712052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696. doi:10.1177/0146167205284282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130. doi:10.1002/per.614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, E. M. (2006). Right-wing authoritarianism and managerial assessment of a schizophrenic candidate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 953–978. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2018). The dimensions of generalized prejudice within the dual-process model: The mediating role of moral foundations. Current Psychology, 37(4), 731–739. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9544-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Heaven, P. C., & Quintin, D. S. (2003). Personality factors predict racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 625–634. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00046-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351. doi:10.1348/014466607X231109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159. doi:10.1177/0963721411409025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2013). Is intergroup contact beneficial among intolerant people? Exploring individual differences in the benefits of contact on attitudes. In G. Hodson & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 63–94). London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., Harry, H., & Mitchell, A. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525. doi:10.1002/ejsp.558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kteily, N. S., Hodson, G., Dhont, K., & Ho, A. K. (2019). Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 3–25. doi: 10.1177/1368430217716750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder, R. D., White, F. A., & Verrelli, S. (2018). Modern avenues for intergroup contact: Using E-contact and intergroup emotions to reduce stereotyping and social distancing against people with schizophrenia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430218794873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcesepe, A. M., & Cabassa, L. J. (2013). Public stigma of mental illness in the United States: A systematic literature review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(5), 384–399. doi:10.1007/s10488-012-0430-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A., Dudgeon, P., Watt, S., & Griffiths, B. (2006). Attitudes toward Indigenous Australians: The issue of “special treatment”. Australian Psychologist, 41, 85–94. doi:10.1080/00050060600585502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411–425. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reavley, N. J., & Jorm, A. F. (2011). Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: Findings from an Australian National Survey of Mental Health Literacy and Stigma. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 1086–1093. doi:10.3109/00048674.2011.621061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, F. A., Verrelli, S., Maunder, R. D., & Kervinen, A. (2018). Using electronic contact to reduce homonegative attitudes, emotions, and behavioral intentions among heterosexual women and men: A contemporary extension of the contact hypothesis. The Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1491943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721. doi:10.1023/A:1015640318045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar