Does the horny man think women want him too? Effects of male sexual arousal on perceptions of female sexual willingness

References

• Anderson, M. J. (2002). From chastity requirement to sexuality license: Sexual consent and a new rape shield law. George Washington Law Review, 70, 51–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98. doi:10.1002/bdm.501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, H., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Effects of sexual motivation on men’s risk perception for sexually transmitted disease: There must be 50 ways to justify a lover. Health Psychology, 16, 374–379. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A., & Miller, H. A. (2014). The role of sexual arousal and overperception of sexual intent within the decision to engage in sexual coercion. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(11), 1967–1986. doi:10.1177/0886260513515950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, W., Wu, W., & Cheng, W. (2017). Sexy women can tempt men down the road of immorality: Exposure to sexy stimuli leads to increased dishonesty in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 616–625. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Villalobos, J. G. (2014). Language and the law: Illustrations from cases of disputed sexual consent. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), Handbook of language and social psychology(pp. 438–458). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.013.014
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Follette, W. C., & Merlino, M. L. (1999). Seeds of rape: Female behavior is probative for females, definitive for males. In Psychological expertise and criminal justice (pp. 101–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2012). Interrogation-related regulatory decline: Ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 673–704. doi:10.1037/a0027367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Loftus, E. F. (2015). Remembering disputed sexual encounters: A new frontier for witness memory research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Invited contribution), 105(4), 811–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., Epstein, E. B., Jacobson, J. A., & MacDonald, T. K. (2006). Visceral influences on risk taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 99–113. doi:10.1002/bdm.520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. M., Sylaska, K. M., Barry, J. E., Moynihan, M. M., Banyard, V. L., Cohn, E. S., … Ward, S. K. (2015). Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: A comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(4), 580–600. doi:10.1177/0886260514535260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeler, I., & Raghubir, P. (2018). Decomposing the cross-sex misprediction bias of dating behaviors: Do men overestimate or women underreport their sexual intentions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 95–100. doi:10.1037/pspi0000105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48–66. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, W. H., & Stoner, S. A. (2000). Understanding acute alcohol effects on sexual behavior. In J. R. Heiman & C. M. Davis (Eds.), Annual review of sex research (Vol. 11, pp. 92–124). Allentown, PA: The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. K., & Zauberman, G. (2013). Can Victoria’s Secret change the future? A subjective time perception account of sexual-cue effects on impatience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 328–335. doi:10.1037/a0028954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 65, 272–292. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Kendrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T., Hofer, B., … Schaller, M. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63–78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. R., Murphy, S. C., von Hippel, W., Trivers, R., & Haselton, M. G. (2017). A preregistered study of competing predictions suggests that men do overestimate women’s sexual intent. Psychological Science, 28(2), 253–255. doi:10.1177/0956797616675474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perilloux, C., & Kurzban, R. (2015). Do men overperceive women’s sexual interest? Psychological Science, 26, 70–77. doi:10.1177/0956797614555727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Zanna, M. P., & Olson, J. M. (2003). Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, W., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1971). Sexual arousal and heterosexual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 93–101. doi:10.1037/h0031943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R. J., Case, T. I., & Oaten, M. J. (2011). Effect of self-reported sexual arousal on responses to sex-related and non-sex-related disgust cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 79–85. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9529-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., Farris, C. A., & Smith, J. R. (2016). Enhancing the accuracy of men’s perceptions of women’s sexual interest in the laboratory. Psychology of Violence, 6(4), 562–572. doi:10.1037/a0039845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalobos, J. G., Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2016). His story, her story: Sexual miscommunication, motivated remembering, and intoxication as pathways to honest false testimony regarding sexual consent. In R. Burnett (Ed.), Vilified: Wrongful allegations of person abuse(pp. 129–142). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723301.003.0010
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, R., & Abbey, A. (2016). Individual differences in men’s misperception of women’s sexual intent: Application and extension of the confluence model. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 16–20. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E. F., & Davis, D. (2016). Perceived and actual probative and definitive value of sexual behaviors in college students: Which behaviors have most potential for miscommunication?. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, (January).
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. F., & Davis, D. (2017). Perceived versus actual links between intoxication and sexual availability. American Psychology Law Society, (March).
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. G., Rikkonen, K., & Davis, D. (2019). Defining, communicating and interpreting sexual consent. In W. T. O’Donohue, & P. Schewe (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 399–421). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, T. B., Simons, J. S., & Maisto, S. A. (2015). Effects of alcohol intoxication and autonomic arousal on delay discounting and risky sex in young adult heterosexual men. Addictive Behaviors, 42, 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar