References
- Agadullina, E. R. (2018). Sexism towards women: Adaptation of the ambivalent sexism scale (P. Glick and S. Fiske) on a Russian sample. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 15(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2018-3-447-463
- Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
- Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060423
- Aspara, J., Wittkowski, K., & Luo, X. (2018). Types of intelligence predict likelihood to get married and stay married: Large-scale empirical evidence for evolutionary theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.028
- Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good Roy. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2014-0191
- Begany, J. J., & Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1037//1524-9220.3.2.119
- Benet-Martínez, V., & Waller, N. G. (2002). From adorable to worthless: Implicit and self-report structure of highly evaluative personality descriptors. European Journal of Personality, 16(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.431
- Bohner, G., Ahlborn, K., & Steiner, R. (2010). How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the ambivalent sexism inventory. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9665-x
- Bosmans, K., Mousaid, S., De Cuyper, N., Hardonk, S., Louckx, F., & Vanroelen, C. (2016). Dirty work, dirty worker? Stigmatisation and coping strategies among domestic workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.008
- Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1413–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611420445
- Burn, S. M., & Busso, J. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00241.x
- Connelly, K., & Heesacker, M. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing?: Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312456369
- Connor, R. A., Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2016). Ambivalent sexism in the 21st century. In C. Sibley & F. Barlow (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 295–320). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/org/doi:10.1017/9781316161579.013
- Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
- Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40(7), 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
- Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2012). Flirting with disaster: Short-term mating orientation and hostile sexism predict different types of sexual harassment. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21444
- Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
- Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions : A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604
- Eagjy, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but … : A meta-anatytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
- EEOC. (2019). Charges alleging sex-based harassment (Charges filed with EEOC) FY 2010 - FY 2019. https://www.eeoc.gov/statistics/charges-alleging-sex-based-harassment-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-2010-fy-2019
- Ellis, L. (2001). The biosocial female choice theory of social stratification. Biodemography and Social Biology, 48(3–4), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2001.9989040
- Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Maintaining distinctions under threat: Heterosexual men endorse the biological theory of sexuality when equality is the norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12051
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Fisicaro, S. A., & Lance, C. E. (1990). Implications of three causal models for the measurement of Halo error. Aplied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169001400407
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187280
- Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2
- Froehlich, L., Martiny, S. E., Deaux, K., & Mok, S. Y. (2016). “It’s their responsibility, not ours”: Stereotypes about competence and causal attributions for immigrants’ academic underperformance. Social Psychology, 47(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000260
- García-González, J., Forcén, P., & Jimenez-Sanchez, M. (2019). Men and women differ in their perception of gender bias in research institutions. PLos One, 14(12), e0225763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225763
- Gaunt, R. (2013). Ambivalent sexism and perceptions of men and women who violate gendered family roles. Community, Work & Family, 16(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2013.779231
- Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1(47), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1033
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary jutifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037//O003-066X.56.2.1O9
- Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Osagie, J. E., Akande, A., Alao, A., Annetje, B., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Expósito, F., & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
- Glick, P., Wilkerson, M., & Cuffe, M. (2015). Masculine identity, ambivalent sexism, and attitudes toward gender subtypes: Favoring masculine men and feminine women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000228
- Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8
- Gräf, M., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). Halo effects in trait assessment depend on information valence: Why being honest makes you industrious, but lying does not make you lazy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215627137
- Herrera, M. C., Herrera, A., & Expósito, F. (2014). Stop harassment! Men’s reactions to victims’ confrontation. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.006
- Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure an American life. Free Press.
- Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
- Hughes, E. C. (1962). Good people and dirty work. Social Problems, 10(1), 3–11. http://doi.org/10.2307/799402
- Human Development Reports. (2018). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/table-5-gender-inequality-index-gii
- Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
- Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
- Katz, R. C., Hannon, R., & Whitten, L. (1996). Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 34(1–2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544794
- Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., Alves, H., van der Veer, K., Yakushko, O., Ommundsen, R., Higler, L., Falomir-pichastor, J. M., Berent, J., Mugny, G., & Faniko, K. (2015). Egalitarianism and sexual prejudice : The role of ingroup distinctiveness motives. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.80
- LeMaire, K. L., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2016). Labeling sexual victimization experiences: The role of sexism, rape myth acceptance, and tolerance for sexual harassment. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00148
- Levada Centre. (2016). International women’s day and gender equality. https://www.levada.ru/2016/03/04/mezhdunarodnyj-zhenskij-den-i-gendernoe-ravnopravie/
- Levada Centre. (2017). Gender discrimination and sexual harassment. https://www.levada.ru/2017/12/07/diskriminatsiya-zhenshhin-i-harrasment/
- Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011
- Martinez, A. G., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2011). The power of a label: Mental illness diagnoses, ascribed humanity, and social rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.1.1
- McCabe, M. P., & Hardman, L. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.6.719-740
- Mõttus, R., Allik, J., Konstabel, K., Kangro, E. M., & Pullmann, H. (2008). Beliefs about the relationships between personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.029
- Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9712-7
- Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Ceci, S. J., Loehlin, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Intelligence : Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77
- Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21(7), 952–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610374740
- Reeder, G. D. (1993). Trait-behavior relations and dispositional inference. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(5), 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77
- Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
- Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60029-5
- Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
- Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. Guilford Press.
- Russell, B. L., & Oswald, D. (2016). When sexism cuts both ways: Predictors of tolerance of sexual harassment of men. Men and Masculinities, 19(5), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15602745
- Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7/8), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd
- Shechory Bitton, M., & Ben Shaul, D. (2013). Perceptions and attitudes to sexual harassment: An examination of sex differences and the sex composition of the harasser-target dyad. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10), 2136–2145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12166
- Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1954), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
- Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745
- Siebler, F., Sabelus, S., & Bohner, G. (2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(32), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00404.x
- Skowronski, J. J. (2002). Honesty and intelligence judgments of individuals and groups: The effects of entity-related behavior diagnosticity and implicit theories. Social Cognition, 20(2), 136–169. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.2.136.20993
- Skowronski, J. J., & Calston, D. E. (1987). Social judgement and social memory: The role of cue diagnositicity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00404.x
- Smiler, A. P., Gelman, S. A., Schomerus, G., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2014). Determinants of gender essentialism in college students. Psychological Medicine, 44(11–12), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9402-x
- Stadler, M., Becker, N., Gödker, M., Leutner, D., & Greiff, S. (2015). Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005
- Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35(5), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004
- Suchland, J. (2008). Contextualizing discrimination: The problem with sexual harassment in RUSSIA. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 29(3), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770802206028
- Swim, J. K., & Campbell, B. (2003). Sexism: Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. In R. Brown & S. Gaetner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 218–237). Blackwell.
- Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
- UNODC, Global Study on Homicide. (2018). https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/GSH2018/GSH18_Gender-related_killing_of_women_and_girls.pdf
- Van Berkel, L., Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., & Blanchar, J. C. (2015). Hierarchy, dominance, and deliberation: Egalitarian values require mental effort. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215591961
- Viki, T. G., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic Chivalry. Sex Roles, 49 (9-10), 533–537. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749
- Vonk, R. (1996). Negativity and potency effects in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 851–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26
- Wiener, R. L., & Hurt, L. E. (2000). How do people evaluate social sexual conduct at work? A psycholegal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/org/IO.I037//0021-9010.85.1.75
- Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500229619
- Zawisza, M., Luyt, R., & Zawadzka, A. M. (2015). Societies in transition: Are they more sexist? A comparison between Polish, South African and British samples. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2013.803952
- Zeidner, M. (1990). Perceptions of ethnic group modal intelligence : Reflections of cultural stereotypes or intelligence test scores? Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 21(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022190212005