Competition between unions as a stimulus for initiating reform: the Israeli case, 1958–2015

References

• Acker, J. (1998). The future of ‘gender and organizations’: Connections and boundaries. Gender, Work & Organization, 5, 195–206.10.1111/gwao.1998.5.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A. (2008). Union competition and strikes: The Need for analysis at the sector level. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 61, 445–459.10.1177/001979390806100401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A. (2014). Involuntary disputes: When competition for members forces smaller unions to strike. Rationality and Society, 26, 446–474.10.1177/1043463114546312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascia, N. (1997). Invisible leadership: Teachers’ union activity in schools. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43, 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascia, N. (1998). Teacher unions and teacher professionalism. In B. Biddle, T. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 437–458). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Beabout, B. R., & Gill, I. (2015). Why here and why now? Teacher motivations for unionizing in a New Orleans charter school. Journal of School Choice, 9, 486–502.10.1080/15582159.2015.1079467
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, E. (2013). Swedish trade unions and European Union migrant workers. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55, 174–189.10.1177/0022185612473211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R., & Leicester, R. (1991). The professional association of teachers: The early years. London: Buckland.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, L., Sherwood, K., Fast, J., & Womack, C. (2004). Teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of the summative evaluation conference: An examination of Model I theories-in-use. International Journal of Educational Management, 18, 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., & Kastiel, R. (1998). Labor relations. Tel Aviv: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, I. (1985). Two thousand teachers view their profession. The Journal of Educational Research, 79, 12–18.10.1080/00220671.1985.10885639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Y., Haberfeld, U., Mundlak, G., & Saporta, I. (2003) Unpacking union density: Membership and coverage in the transformation of the Israeli IR system. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42, 692–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (1982). Trade unions: The logic of collective action. Glasgow: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, G., & McIlroy J. (2009). Trade unions in a neoliberal world. London: Taylor & Francis.‏
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, J. T., & Godard, J. (2002). An industrial relations perspective on the high-performance paradigm. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 395–429.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, J., & Powell, W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, R. (1997). The effects of multi-unionism: A survey of large manufacturing establishments. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 35, 547–566.10.1111/bjir.1997.35.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolton, P., & Robson, M. (1996). Trade union concentration and the determination of wages: The case of teachers in England and Wales. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34, 539–555.10.1111/bjir.1996.34.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, J. T. (1958). Industrial relations system. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Dunlop Industrial Relations Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645–672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, C., & Morris, J. (2009). Still searching for the evidence? Evidence-based policy, performance pay and teachers. Journal of Industrial Relations, 51, 75–94.10.1177/0022185608099666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do?. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. (1976). Union structure and rank and file revolt: The Israeli Experience. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 31, 261–283.10.7202/028706ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. (1994). Front stage, backstage: The dramatic structure of labor negotiations, Vol. 10. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208574
   Google Scholar
• Glass, S. (1995). A pension deficit disorder. Policy Review, 27, 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Histadrut Hamorim. (2004) The determining step: The program of the teachers’ union for the advance of education in Israel. Tel Aviv: Histadrut Hamorim. [ Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Hollinshead, G., Nicholls, P., & Tailby, S. (2002). Employee relations. London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, H., & Wolinsky, A. (1988). Worker substitutability and patterns of unionization. The Economic Journal, 98, 484–497.10.2307/2233379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‏Hoxby, C. (1996). How teachers’ unions affect education production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 671–718.10.2307/2946669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, G. (2014) Effects of union organization on strike incidence in EU companies. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 67, 60–85.10.1177/001979391406700103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen, C. L., & Tapia, M. (2017). Trade union revitalisation: Where are we now? Where to next? Journal of Industrial Relations, 59, 117–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayeoba, F. I., Ayantunji, O. I., & Sholesi, O. Y. (2013). A critique of the systems theory of JT Dunlop. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2, 97.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., Donaldson, M. L., Munger, M. S., Papay, J. P., & Qazilbash, E. K. (2007). Leading the local: Teacher union presidents speak on change. Challenges. Washington, DC: Education Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica. Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–292.10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341.10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppich, J. (1993). Getting started: A primer on professional unionism. In C. T. Kerchner & J. E. Koppich (eds) A union of professionals: Labor relations and educational reform (pp. 194–204). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerchner, T., & Caufman, D. (1995). Lurching toward professionalism: The Saga of teacher unionism. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 107–122.10.1086/461817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshwar, A., & Seegum, T. (2013). Motivation among public primary school teachers in Mauritius. International Journal of Educational Management, 27, 446–464.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., Olson, D., Agnone, J., & Kelly, D. (2009). Union democracy reexamined. Politics & Society, 37, 203–228.10.1177/0032329209333925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja, P. (2014). The politics of teacher professionalism: Intraprofessional boundary work in Swedish teacher union policy. Policy Futures in Education, 12, 500–512.10.2304/pfie.2014.12.4.500
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn, R. (1990). Exploring heresy in collective bargaining and school restructuring. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 781–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, S., Stewart, M., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). The economic effects of multiple unionism: Evidence from the 1984 workplace industrial relations survey. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 279–296.10.2307/3440356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., & Granlund, L. (2012). Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers’ union. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 815–833.10.1080/02680939.2012.672656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, M. (2005). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizala, A., & Schneider, R. (2014). Negotiating education reform: Teacher evaluations and incentives in Chile (1990–2010). Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 27, 87–109.‏10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, M. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, A. (2004). Purposive sampling. In M. S. Lewis Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 884–885). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mundlak, G., Saporta, I., Haberfeld, Y., & Cohen, Y. (2013). Union density in Israel 1995–2010: The hybridization of industrial relations. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 52, 78–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornstein, A. C. (1981). The trend toward increased professionalism for teachers. The Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 196–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornstein, C. (1988). The changing status of the teaching profession. Urban Education, 23, 261–279.10.1177/0042085988023003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlenko, D. (2005). Reevaluating inter-union competition: A proposal to resurrect rival unionism. Journal of Labor and Employment, 8, 651–706‏.
   Google Scholar
• Petruska, B. (2003). Choosing competition: A proposal to modify Article XX of the AFL-CIO constitution. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal, 21, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjola, M. (1984). Union rivalry and economic growth: A differential game approach. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86, 365–370.10.2307/3439869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, L. (1999). Teachers union involvement in educational policy making: Issues raised by an in-depth case. Educational Policy, 13, 698–725.10.1177/0895904899013005005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauth, M. (1990). Exploring heresy in collective bargaining and school restructuring. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 781–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritson, N. H., Wilson, M. M., & Maclean, G. (2015). Trade union recognition by MNCs: Evidence of an underlying rationale in UK petrochemicals. Labor History, 56, 499–520.10.1080/0023656X.2016.1086561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruysseveldt, J., & Visser, J. (1996). Industrial relations in Europe: Traditions and transitions. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2013). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New-York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shedd, B. (1988). Collective bargaining, school reform, and the management of school systems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24, 405–415.10.1177/0013161X88024004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirley, D. (2016). Entrenched enemies, tactical partners, or steadfast allies? Exploring the fault lines between teacher unions and community organizing in the United States. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15, 45–66.10.1080/15700763.2015.1052521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojourner, A. (2013). Do unions promote members’ electoral office holding? Evidence from correlates of state legislatures’ occupational shares. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66, 467–486.10.1177/001979391306600207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2010). Working in, and against, the neo-liberal state: Global perspectives on K-12 Teacher Unions: Special issue introduction. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 17, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2014). New unionism? Teacher unions, social partnership and school governance in England and Wales. Local Government Studies, 40, 954–971.10.1080/03003930.2012.726142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk, O., & Grissom, A. (2010). Do Strong unions shape district policies?: Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Education and Policy Analysis, 32, 389–406.10.3102/0162373710376665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloudis, N. (2015). Teacher unions conflict in New York City, 1935–1960. Labor History, 56, 566–586.‏10.1080/0023656X.2015.1116805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, E. (2009). Head organization – Post primary school teachers’ union organization development process. Tel Aviv: Yedioth Ahronoth Books. [ Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Velber, Y. (1982) Personal conversation: Why don’t we come to terms with firing teachers? Hed Hachinuch, 59, 15–20. [ Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Wiborg, S., & Larsen, K. R. (2017). Why school choice reforms in Denmark fail: The blocking power of the teacher union. European Journal of Education, 52, 92–103.10.1111/ejed.2017.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S. (2007). Fighting the ‘damnable triumph’ of feminism: Battles between teachers’ unions in interwar Britain. Gender and Education, 19, 669–676.10.1080/09540250701650581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yariv, E., & Coleman, M. (2005). Managing ‘challenging’ teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 19, 330–346.
   Google Scholar

• Cohen, M. (2014, March 10). Updates on reforms ‘New Horizon’ and the ‘Courage to Change’. Circular of General Director of the Ministry of Education. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dagan, S. (1983). 25 Years of the organization, 1958–1983: Celebratory Issue. Ma’a lot – Newsletter of the Secondary School Teachers’ Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Missive 39. (1961, 10). Issued by the National Board of the Organization of Trade and Agricultural High Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Missive. (1970, November 23). The general strike stage 2. High school teachers’ association. Binder 6. Tel Aviv University Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Protocol 7. (1970, December 14). A meeting of the council of the Secondary School Teachers’ Organization. Binder 6. Tel Aviv University Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Protocol 25. (1978, November 11). A meeting of the council of the Secondary School Teachers’ Organization. Binder 10. Tel Aviv University Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Television Report. (1978). The teachers’ strike of 1978. A broadcast that was prepared for the Mabat program on the state television channel, Israel Broadcast Authority. Broadcast on June 5, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• The National Board. (2000). ‘Courage to change’ – The program of the secondary school teachers’ organization to change the education system. The Organization of Secondary School Teachers in Seminars and Colleges.
   Google Scholar