INNOVATION ANN SURFACE SHIPS: THE TYPE 82 DESTROYER AND THE FUTURE FLEET WORKING PARTY

References

• 1986 . The Post-War Naval Revolution The classification of warships is an incorrect science both within one navy and between navies, as the roles of classes can change significantly over time and salient characteristics associated with a class do not necessarily match the designation. For a more detailed discussion of the distinction between cruisers and destroyers see Norman Friedman, (Conway, London, 110
   Google Scholar
• 28 October 1966 . 28 October , The National Archive, Public Record Office (hereafter NA PRO), DEFE 24/149 ‘The Shape of the Future Fleet’, Annex II to Letter from Minister of Defence (RN) to Secretary of State
   Google Scholar
• 1980 . Statement on the Defence Estimates, Cmnd. 7826, I
   Google Scholar
• Personal interview.
   Google Scholar
• Grove , Eric . 1987 . Vanguard to Trident Annapolis : Naval Institute Press . (US ch. 3
   Google Scholar
• Ibid 92
   Google Scholar
• Ibid 96
   Google Scholar
• Friedman . Post-War Naval Revolution 110
   Google Scholar
• Ibid 110 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Grove . Vanguard to Trident ch. 5
   Google Scholar
• Ibid 250 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Grove , Eric . 1990 . NATO Major Warships Europe (Triservice Press, London, 147
   Google Scholar
• Archibald , E. H. H. 1984 . The Fighting Ship in the Royal Navy, 897–1984 rev. edn (Blandford Press, Poole, 257
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• See various documents in NA PRO, Adm. 205/220.
   Google Scholar
• R. Hill , J. 1995 . The Oxford Illustrated History of the Royal Navy 428 Oxford : OUP . (p
   Google Scholar
• Archibald . The Fighting Ship 257
   Google Scholar
• Hill . Oxford Illustrated History 429
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, Adm. 205/220 ‘Summary of Paper on Type 82 Frigate [sic]’, Annex to Lewin; Ashmore, Directors, Naval Future Policy Staff, ‘Type 82 GMD—Tactical Study’, 12 May 1965, NFPS 18/64 (Final).
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, Adm. 205/220, Controller of the Navy—Memorandum, ‘The Type 82 Guided Missile Destroyer—Building Drawings and Legend of Particulars’, Admiralty Board, 7 July 1965, A/P(65)17; emphasis added.
   Google Scholar
• 14 June 1965 . Ibid 14 June , Copy of a Minute Reference 82/402/65, dated from the Chief Scientific Adviser to the Chief of the Defence Staff—ADA for the Type 82 GMD, Annex A to COB 1897/46/6/65; emphasis added
   Google Scholar
• Ibid emphasis added
   Google Scholar
• Ibid ‘The Type 82 Guided Missile Destroyer—Memorandum by the Minister (RN)’, DC/P(65); emphasis added
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, Adm. 205/220 ‘The Type 82 Guided Missile Destroyer—Memorandum by the Minister (RN)’, DC/P(65).
   Google Scholar
• 13 January 1967 . Ibid 13 January , DEFE 24/149 ‘The Place of the Type 82 Weapon Systems in the Future Fleet’, Annex to letter from the Chief of the Naval Staff to the Secretary of State
   Google Scholar
• 28 October 1966 . Ibid 28 October , ‘The Shape of the Future Fleet’, Annex II to Letter from Minister of Defence (RN) to Secretary of State, The Future Fleet
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid ‘Concept of Naval Operations’, Annex I to Letter from Minister of Defence (RN) to Secretary of State, 28 October 1966
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• 23 December 1966 . Ibid 23 December , ‘Concept of Naval Operations’, Ministry of Defence, Chiefs of Staff Committee, Concept of Naval Operations, COS 141/66
   Google Scholar
• Ibid NEFE 24/128 ‘FFWP Report—Conclusions and Recommendations’, Attachment to Letter from N. A. Nicholls, N.S.4a, to various recipients, 30 August 1966
   Google Scholar
• 28 October 1966 . Ibid 28 October , NEFE 24/149 Letter from Minister of Defence (RN) to Secretary of State, The Future Fleet
   Google Scholar
• 28 October 1966 . Ibid 28 October , ‘The Shape of the Future Fleet’, Annex II to Letter from Minister of Defence (RN) to Secretary of State, The Future Fleet
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• 13 January 1967 . Ibid 13 January , ‘The Place of the Type 82 Weapon Systems in the Future Fleet’, Annex to Letter from the Chief of the Naval Staff to the Secretary of Defence, The Future Fleet,; all information and quotations from this document until otherwise indicated
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid Secretary of State for Defence, ‘The Future Fleet—The Type 82 Destroyer’, 13 February 1967, Mo./9/1/7/1
   Google Scholar
• 1967 . The pound was after all devalued in
   Google Scholar
• Concept of Maritime Operations until the early 1980s. NA PRO, NEFE 24/128, All following quotes refer to this document until otherwise indicated
   Google Scholar
• Ibid, Options for Meeting the Concept of Operations—The Fleet in 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid NEFE 24/235, A(SC)M/26/67, Board Sub-Committee on the Report of the Future Fleet Working Party, Note of Meeting held on 22 December 1967
   Google Scholar
• Ibid NEFE 24/218, The Future Fleet - Note on Minister (RN)'s submission of 28 October 1966
   Google Scholar
• Ibid NEFE 24/239, A(SC)P/24/67, Progress Report—‘Shape’ of the Fleet, June 1967
   Google Scholar
• Ibid . Ibid NEFE 24/149, Letter Denis Healey to James Callaghan, Command Cruiser, Mo. 9/1/7/1
   Google Scholar
• October 1973 . Flight International October , 702 Sea Dart's performance was partly reduced because of the limited radar capabilities and due to the reintroduction of ‘men to assist in detection and tracking’, Mark Hewish, ‘Sea Dart—area defence for the 1980s’, vol.25
   Google Scholar
• 22 January 1974 . “ Session 1973–74 ” . In Session 1973–74 22 January , Memorandum by Ministry of Defence in Expenditure Committee—Defence and External Affairs Sub-Committee, Minutes of Evidence, Tuesday HC 99-viii, 132, para. 10
   Google Scholar
• Memorandum by Ministry of Defence in HC (1973–74), 99-viii, 132, para. 10; emphasis added.
   Google Scholar