MORE BANG FOR A BOB: THE DECISION TO ‘GO NUCLEAR’ AND ITS IMPACT ON CHATHAM DOCKYARD

References

• Kennedy , P. 1989 . The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economics Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 London Quoted in (476
   Google Scholar
• 1987 . Vanguard to Trident: British Naval Policy since World War II London For background to the development of the nuclear deterrent see: E. Grove, (M. Chalmers, Paying for Defence: Military Spending and British Decline (London, 1985); D. Holdstock & F. Barnaby (eds), The British Nuclear Weapons Programme, 1952–2002 (London, 2003); E.J. de Kadt, British Defence Policy and Nuclear War (London, 1964); M. Dockrill, British Defence Since 1945 (Oxford, 1988)
   Google Scholar
• Nailor , P. 1988 . The Nassau Connection: The Organization and Management of the British Polaris Project London See: (J.E. Moore, The Impact of Polaris: The Origins of Britain's Seaborne Nuclear Deterrent (Huddersfield, 1999)
   Google Scholar
• Sked , A. and Cook , C. 1993 . Post-War Britain: A Political History, New Edition, 1945–1992 London (143
   Google Scholar
• Defence: Outline of Future Policy. British Parliamentary Papers (hereafter BPP) (1956–7, Cmnd 124, XXIII), 489
   Google Scholar
• 1955 . National Archives (hereafter NA) PRO ADM 1/26068. ‘Where are we going’ board memorandum B983: Review of future naval policy
   Google Scholar
• Moore . Impact of Polaris 14
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds , D. 1991 . Britannia Overruled: British Policy and World Power in the 20th Century London (54
   Google Scholar
• Moore . Impact of Polaris 15
   Google Scholar
• 8 Nov. 1962 . POLARIS SSBNs—acquisition, organisation and assignment to NATO: future development/failure of SKYBOLT (air-surface missile) 8 Nov. , NA PRO, ADM 1/28839., 1962–3: Telegram No. 2832 from Sir D. Ormsby Gore, Washington, to Foreign Office
   Google Scholar
• 20 Dec. 1962 . 20 Dec. , NA PRO, ADM 1/28839. Text of Draft Statement on British Nuclear Defence System agreed by the Prime Minister and the President of the United States in the course of their Bahamas meeting 18–
   Google Scholar
• Grove , E. 4 December 2004 . “ For a detailed discussion of the navy's proposed carrier fleet see Grove ” . In Vanguard to Trident. 4 December , ‘From Tactom to Seaslug: The Royal Navy and the Guided Missile 1944–2004’, conference paper presented at Innovation and the Royal Navy, 1930–2000, National Maritime Museum
   Google Scholar
• Hansard . 11 Mar. 1965 . 11 Mar. , (Commons) 708 col. 663: Christopher Paget Mayhew, Minister of Defence for the Royal Navy, speaking about the US Polaris Fleet and planned British Fleet
   Google Scholar
• 26 May 1961 . Frigate and submarine building programme 26 May , NA PRO, ADM 1/27872., 1960–61: Appendix A ‘Frigates and Submarines’, dated
   Google Scholar
• Jane's Fighting Ships and private correspondence with R. Jack Daniel
   Google Scholar
• Moore . Impact of Polaris 46
   Google Scholar
• Ibid 120
   Google Scholar
• Polaris Submarine Programme: Choice of Yards. NA PRO, ADM 1/29356. Draft EPC Paper: ‘Polaris’ Submarine Building Programme—Choice of Building Yards. Memorandum by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Lord Carrington, no date but c.1963
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, ADM 1/27872.
   Google Scholar
• Weir , G. 1993 . Forged In War: Naval-Industrial Complex and American Submarine Construction, 1940–61 Washington
   Google Scholar
• 8 Feb. 2005 . 8 Feb. , Private correspondence with R. Jack Daniel
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• May 1961 . May , NA PRO, ADM 1/27872. D(61) 8th Meeting (Extracts from minutes of a meeting held at Admiralty House, 31st and Nash's paper D(61)29
   Google Scholar
• ‘Established’ status was awarded to a limited proportion of the dockyard workforces; those achieving Establishment would be entitled to a pension and expected to enjoy a ‘job for life’. The security afforded by Establishment compensated for the lower rates of pay that workers received in comparison to private shipyard workers. Established workers were usually offered employment at other dockyards in the event of cutbacks and closures.
   Google Scholar
• 31 May 1963 . Chatham, Rochester & Gillingham News 31 May , NA PRO, ADM 1/28574. ‘Polaris submarine programme: Choice of building yards 1963: Effect of Polaris Programme on Chatham Dockyard’, newspaper cutting taken from
   Google Scholar
• 9 Aug. 1963 . 9 Aug. , NA PRO, ADM 1/28574 L.3724/63
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, ADM 1/28574.
   Google Scholar
• Moore . Impact of Polaris 121
   Google Scholar
• 22 Mar. 1963 . Chatham, Rochester & Gillingham News 22 Mar. , ‘Nuclear Submarines at Chatham: Civil Lord's Statement is ‘somewhat surprising’’, 13
   Google Scholar
• Moore . Impact of Polaris 121
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, ADM 1/27806. Draft Minute: M.II/618/18/59.
   Google Scholar
• Jane's Fighting Ships.
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, ADM 1/27806.
   Google Scholar
• Submarines for Australian Navy: Question of building in Royal dockyards 1963. NA PRO, Department of Economic Works (EW) 7/30: Information from Mr Day concerning Chatham region's economic status
   Google Scholar
• 12 June 1963 . Statement on the royal dockyards made by the Civil Lord. 12 June , Chatham Dockyard Historical Society, Chatham (hereafter CDHS), Chatham Yard Industrial Whitley Committee, Minutes, 194th Meeting
   Google Scholar
• 29 Nov. 1963 . “ Appendix I: ” . In Restriction in Numbers Employed During 1964/65 29 Nov. , CDHS, Minutes of the Meeting of the Chatham Yard Non-Industrial Whitley Committee held on (notes regarding Admiral Superintendent Beloe's memo no. 65/63)
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, EW 7/30.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• 2 Dec. 1963 . Placing of Orders for Commonwealth Submarines 2 Dec. , NA PRO, ADM 1/28593
   Google Scholar
• 7 Apr. 1964 . Report on considerations involved in selection of yards to refit nuclear submarines 1963–1964. 7 Apr. , NA PRO, ADM 1/29069. M.II.618/6/64 memorandum from DS 5 to DUS 2 (N) dated
   Google Scholar
• Effect of Polaris Programme on Chatham Dockyard: Development of Chatham Dockyard for Nuclear Submarine Refitting Work: Notes for Supplementaries. NA PRO, ADM 1/28574
   Google Scholar
• Hansard . 11 Mar. 1965 . 11 Mar. , (Commons), 708, col. 665
   Google Scholar
• 24 Sept. 1965 . Chatham Observer 24 Sept. , CDHS, to 11 Jan. 1966
   Google Scholar
• 1 Dec. 2004 . 1 Dec. , Private correspondence with R. Jack Daniel
   Google Scholar
• NA PRO, ADM 1/28574, L.3724/63, MS 6.
   Google Scholar
• Gorst , A. and Johnman , L. 1998 . “ ‘British Naval Procurement and Shipbuilding, 1945–1964’ in D.J. Starkey & A.G. Jamieson (eds) ” . In Exploiting the Sea: Aspects of Britain's Maritime Economy Since 1870 142 – 3 . Exeter
   Google Scholar
• 8 Feb. 2005 . 8 Feb. , Private correspondence with R. Jack Daniel
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Chatham Dockyard: nuclear refitting facilities; approval of works required 1965 Aug 01—1967Jun 30. NA PRO, ADM 329/9
   Google Scholar
• 1 Dec. 2004 . 1 Dec. , Private correspondence with R. Jack Daniel
   Google Scholar
• 4 Oct. 1959 . Chatham News 4 Oct. , ‘PM Visits Medway and Pledges—DOCKYARD WILL NOT BE CLOSED’, 1
   Google Scholar