Nonparametric Calibration of Item-by-Attribute Matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis

References

• Barnes, T. (2003). The Q-matrix method of fault-tolerant teaching in knowledge assessment and data mining, North Carolina State University, USA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4612
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. (1996). Methods for concept mapping in computer based education. Unpublished master thesis dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. (2013). Statistical refinement of the Q-matrix in cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 598–618. doi:10.1177/0146621613488436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., & Douglas, J. (2013). A nonparametric approach to cognitive diagnosis by proximity to ideal response pattern. Journal of Classification, 30, 225–250. doi:10.1007/s00357-013-9132-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, L. T. (2011). On the analysis of fraction subtraction data: The DINA model, classification, latent class sizes, and the Q-matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 8–26. doi:10.1177/0146621610377081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, L. T. (2012). Recognizing uncertainty in the Q-matrix via a Bayesian extension of the DINA model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 447–468. doi:10.1177/0146621612449069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., & Chiu, C. Y. (2010, April). General empirical method of Q-Matrix validation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76, 179–199. doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically based method of q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 343–362. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69, 333–353. doi:10.1007/BF02295640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., & Chiu, C. (2015). A general method of empirical Q-matrix validation. Psychometrika, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9467-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz, S.M., & Roussos, L.A. (2008). The fusion model for skills diagnosis: Blending theory with practice. ETS Research Report RR-08-71. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, R., Templin, J., & Willse, J. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74, 191–210. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9089-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubal, R. (1992). Retro-adaptive testing and evaluation system. Unpublished masters thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Huo, Y., & De la Torre, J. (2013, April). Data-driven Q-matrix specification for subsequent test forms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Im, S., & Corter, J. E. (2011). Statistical consequences of attribute misspecification in the rule space method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 712–731. doi:10.1177/0013164410384855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, B.W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258–272. doi:10.1177/01466210122032064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. S., & Drasgow, F. (2017). Conditional independence and dimensionality of cognitive diagnostic models: A test for model fit. Journal of Classification.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Xu, G., & Ying, Z. (2012). Data-driven learning of Q-matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 548–564. doi:10.1177/0146621612456591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Xu, G, & Ying, Z. (2011). Theory of the self-learning Q-matrix. Bernoulli, 36, 548–564. doi:10.3150/12-BEJ430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp & Templin, (2008). The effects of Q-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 78–96. doi:10.1177/0013164407301545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Roussos, L.A., DiBello, L.V., Stout, W.F., Hartz, S.M., Henson, R.A., & Templin, J.L. (2007). The fusion model skills diagnosis system. In J.P. Leighton & M.J. Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications (pp. 275–318). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 453–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345–354. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templin, J. (2006). CDM user's guide. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, Kansas, NE.
   Google Scholar
• Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11, 287–305. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2005, September). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. (Research report No. RR-05-16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2008). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 287–301. doi:10.1348/000711007X193957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Douglas, J. (2013). Consistency of nonparametric classification in cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 80(1), 85–100. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9372-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Chiu, C. (2015). NPCD: An R package for nonparametric methods for cognitive diagnosis. R package version 1.0-9. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NPCD
   Google Scholar