Accounting for Missing Correlation Coefficients in Fixed-Effects MASEM

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. J. (1992). Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17(4), 341–362. doi: 10.2307/1165128.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. J. (1995). Corrections to “using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(1), 100–102. doi: 10.2307/1165390
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. J. (2009). Model-based meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 377–395). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Lee, S.-Y. (1983). Covariance structures under polynomial constraints: Applications to correlation and alpha-type structural models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 8(3), 207–222. doi: 10.3102/10769986008003207
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., … Joo, H. (2016). Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 477–497. doi: 10.1002/smj.2338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. (2015). Applied meta-analysisfor social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2009). Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 425–438. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015a). Meta-Analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015b). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis usingstructural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40–64. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2009). A two-stage approach to synthesizing covariance matrices in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(1), 28–53. doi: 10.1080/10705510802561295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L., & Hafdahl, A. R. (2016). Special issue on meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Introduction from the guest editors. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 112–120. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L., & Hong, R. (2017). Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modeling in health psychology: Examples, issues, and recommendations. Health Psychology Review, 11(3), 265–279. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2017.1343678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. F. (2000). Examining solutions to two practical issues in meta-analysis: Dependent correlations and missing data in correlation matrices (Ph.D.). The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. S., & Chang, L. (2016). A meta-analytic multitrait multirater separation of substance and style in social desirability scales. Journal of Personality, 84(3), 319–334. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, R., Dahdah, M., Norman, P., & French, D. P. (2016). How well does the theory of planned behaviour predict alcohol consumption? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 148–167. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.947547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 317–327. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem08035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed-and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 161–180. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 227–254. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2010). An evaluation of multiple imputation for meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Journal of Modern AppliedStatistical Methods, 9(1), 129–143. doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1272687180
   Google Scholar
• Guan, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias. PsychonomicBulletin and Review 23, 74–86. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0868-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafdahl, A. R. (2007). Combining correlation matrices: Simulation analysis of improved fixed-effects methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(2), 180–205. doi: 10.3102/1076998606298041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafdahl, A. R. (2008). Combining heterogeneous correlation matrices: Simulation analysis of fixed-effects methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33(4), 507–533. doi: 10.3102/1076998607309472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafdahl, A. R., & Williams, M. A. (2009). Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: Attempted replication and extension of field’s (2001) simulation studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 24–42. doi: 10.1037/a0014697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L., & Vevea, J. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling an overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(3), 329–367. doi: 10.1177/0049124198026003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, S. (2015). Meta-analytic structural equation modelling. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27174-3
   Google Scholar
• Jak, S., Oort, F. J., Roorda, D. L., & Koomen, H. M. (2013). Meta-analytic structural equation modelling with missing correlations. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. doi: 10.1037/e632032012-001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., Asencio, R., Seely, P. W., & De Church, L. A. (2015). How organizational identity affects team functioning the identity instrumentality hypothesis. Journal ofManagement, Online first. doi: 10.1177/0149206315614370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A., Brandes, K., Mullan, B., & Hagger, M. S. (2015). Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(4), 673–688. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, R. D. (2009). Multivariate meta-analysis: The effect of ignoring within-study correlation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 172(4), 789–811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosopa, P. J., & Kim, B. (2016). Robustness of statistical inferences using linear models with meta-analytic correlation matrices. Human ResourceManagement Review, 27(1), 216–236. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saris, W., & Satorra, A. (1993). Power evaluations in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 181–204). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). On obtaining estimates of the fraction of missing information from full information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 477–494. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2012.687669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, Z., Kong, W., Cortina, J. M., & Hou, S. (2016). Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: Current practices and recommendations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 187–208. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. doi: 10.1177/1745691614553988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, R., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2016). Testing IB theories with meta-analytic structural equation modeling: The TSSEM approach and the univariate-r approach. Review of InternationalBusiness and Strategy, 26(4), 472–492. doi: 10.1108/RIBS-04-2016-0022.
   Google Scholar
• Topa, G., & Moriano, J. A. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and smoking: Meta-analysis and SEM model. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 1, 23–33. doi: 10.2147/sar.s15168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Assen, M. A., van Aert, R., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 293–309. doi: 10.1037/met0000025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865–885. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar