A Diagnostic Procedure for Detecting Outliers in Linear State–Space Models

References

• Anderson, B. D. O., & Moore, J. B. (1979). Optimal filtering. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, M. (1990). State space modeling of time series. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, M., & Frees, E. W. (1997). Influence diagnostics for linear longitudinal models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(439), 999–1005. doi:10.1080/01621459.1997.10474055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X. R., & Kirubarajan, T. (2004). Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation: Theory algorithms and software. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, doi:10.1002/0471221279
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K., & Cattell, R. B. (1974). Changes in psychological state measures and time of day. Psychological Reports, 35(1), 219–222. doi:10.2466/pr0.1974.35.1.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1975). Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(349), 70–79. doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10480264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookner, E. (1998). Tracking and Kalman filtering made easy. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471224197
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2005). Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: Some promising uses and extensions of autoregressive moving average time series models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares., & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary Psychometrics: A Festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 415–452). Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781410612977
   Google Scholar
• Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716–1735. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C. K., & Kohn, R. (1994). On Gibbs sampling for state space models. Biometrika, 81(3), 541–553. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, I., Tiao, G. C., & Chen, C. (1988). Estimation of time series parameters in the presence of outliers. Technometrics, 30(2), 193–204. doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Chow, S.-M., & Hunter, M. D. (2018). Stochastic differential equation models with time-varying parameters. In: K. Van Montfort, J. H. Oud., & M. C. Voelkle (Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 205–238). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77219-6_9
   Google Scholar
• Chib, S. (1998). Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. Journal of Econometrics, 86(2), 221–241. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00115-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Hamaker, E. L., & Allaire, J. C. (2009). Using innovative outliers to detect discrete shifts in dynamics in group-based state-space models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(4), 465–496. doi:10.1080/00273170903103324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Ho, M.-H. R., Hamaker, E. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Equivalences and differences between structural equation and state-space modeling frameworks. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(2), 303–332. doi:10.1080/10705511003661553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Nesselroade, J. R., Shifren, K., & McArdle, J. J. (2004). Dynamic structure of emotions among individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(4), 560–582. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1104_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., & Zhang, G. (2013). Nonlinear regime-switching state-space (RSSS) models. Psychometrika, 78(4), 740–768. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9330-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Zu, J., Shifren, K., & Zhang, G. (2011). Dynamic factor analysis models with time-varying parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 303–339. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.563697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. (1986). Assessment of local influence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Methodological, 48, 133–169. doi:10.21236/ada143002
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, P. (1988). The likelihood for a state space model. Biometrika, 75(1), 165–169. doi:10.2307/2336450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, P., & Penzer, J. (1998). Diagnosing shocks in time series. Journal of American Statistical Association, 93(442), 796–806. doi:10.1080/01621459.1998.10473731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, S. H. C., & Browne, M. W. (2007). Structural equation modeling of multivariate time series. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 67–101. doi:10.1080/00273170701340953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emotions and Dynamic Systems Laboratory. (2010). The affective dynamics and individual differences (ADID) study: developing non-stationary and network-based methods for modeling the perception and physiology of emotions [Computer software manual].
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., & Yao, Q. (2008). Nonlinear time series: Nonparametric and parametric methods. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-69395-8
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. J. (1972). Outliers in time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 350–363. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00912.x
   Google Scholar
• Fried, R., Gather, U., & Imhoff, M. (2001). Online pattern recognition in intensive care medicine. In Proceedings of the Amia symposium (p. 184).
   Google Scholar
• Hamerle, A., Singer, H., & Nagl, W. (1993). Identification and estimation of continuous time dynamic systems with exogenous variables using panel data. Econometric Theory, 9(2), 283–295. doi:10.1017/S0266466600007544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harchaoui, Z., & Lévy-Leduc, C. (2010). Multiple change-point estimation with a total variation penalty. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(492), 1480–1493. doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. C. (1990). Forecasting, Structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107049994
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. C., & Koopman, S. J. (1992). Diagnostic checking of unobserved components time series models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 377–389. doi:10.2307/1391813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazrana, J. (2017). Modelling international oilseed prices: An application of the structural time series model. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 5(2), 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45. doi:10.1115/1.3662552
   Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., Tierney, L., & Kadane, J. B. (1989). Approximate methods for assessing influence and sensitivity in Bayesian analysis. Biometrika, 76(4), 663–674. doi:10.1093/biomet/76.4.663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C.-J., & Nelson, C. R. (1999). State-Space Models with Regime Switching: Classical and Gibbs-Sampling Approaches with Applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, G. (1977). An algorithm for solving the matrix equation X=FXFT+S. International Journal of Control, 25(5), 745–753. doi:10.1080/00207177708922266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, G., & Gersch, W. (1996). Smoothness priors analysis of time series, vol. 116. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0761-0
   Google Scholar
• Mathias, J., & Wheaton, P. (2007). Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology, 21(2), 212–223. 03). doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, R. E., & Tsay, R. S. (1993). Bayesian inference and prediction for mean and variance shifts in autoregressive time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 968–978. doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C., & Raijmakers, M. (1998). Fitting nonlinear dynamical models directly to observed time series. In K. M. Newell & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Applications of nonlinear dynamics to developmental process modeling (pp. 269–297). New York: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9781315805962
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 599–620. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, N. P., Wiig, E. H., Bäck, S., & Gustafsson, J. (2017). Processing speed can monitor stimulant-medication effects in adults with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 71(4), 296–303. doi:10.1080/08039488.2017.1280534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, L., Hunter, M. D., & Chow, S.-M. (2016). dynr: Dynamic modeling in r [Computer software manual]. (R package version 0.1.7-22)
   Google Scholar
• Ou, L., Hunter, M. D., & Chow, S.-M. (2018). revised and resubmitted). What’s for dynr: A package for linear and nonlinear dynamic modeling in R. The R Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65(2), 199–215. doi:10.1007/BF02294374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagan, A. (1980). Some identification and estimation results for regression models with stochastically varying coefficients. Journal of Econometrics, 13(3), 341–363. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(80)90084-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, F., Robin, S., Lavielle, M., Vaisse, C., & Daudin, J.-J. (2005). A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 6(1), 27. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286. doi:10.1109/5.18626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweppe, F. C. (1965). Evaluation of likelihood functions for Gaussian signals. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 11(1), 61–70. doi:10.1109/TIT.1965.1053737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selukar, R. (2011). State space modeling using SAS. Journal of Statistical Software, 41(12), 1–13. doi:10.18637/jss.v041.i12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shephard, N. (1994). Partial non-Gaussian state space. Biometrika, 81(1), 115–131. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, H. (1998). Continuous panel models with time dependent parameters. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(2), 77–98. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1998.9990214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, N., Chow, S.-M., Ibrahim, J. G., & Zhu, H. (2017). Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear dynamic factor analysis model with nonparametric prior and possible nonignorable missingness. Psychometrika, 82(4), 875–903. doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9587-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, X., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Outlying observation diagnostics in growth curve modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(6), 768–788. doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1374824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay, R. S. (1988). Outliers, level shifts and variances changes in time series. Journal of Forecasting, 7(1), 1–20. doi:10.1002/for.3980070102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, A. (2011). Time series outlier detection: A new non parametric methodology (washer. ). Statistica, 71(3), 329–344. doi:10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3617
   Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L. (2013). Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 103–126. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02043.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale–Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV) (Vol. 22). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• West, M., & Harrison, J. (1989). Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9365-9
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y.-C. (1988). Estimating the number of change-points via Schwarz’criterion. Statistics & Probability Letters, 6(3), 181–189. doi:10.1016/0167-7152(88)90118-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Zhong, X. (2008). Outliers, leverage observations, and influential cases in factor analysis: Using robust procedures to minimize their effect. Sociological Methodology, 38(1), 329–368. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2008). Comparisons of four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(3), 377–402. doi:10.1080/10705510802154281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Ibrahim, J. G., Lee, S. Y., & Zhang, H. P. (2007). Appropriate perturbation and influence measures in local influence. The Annals of Statistics, 35(6), 2565–2588. doi:10.1214/009053607000000343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zivot, E., & Wang, J. (2007). Modeling financial time series with S-Plus (Vol. 191). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-32348-0
   Google Scholar