Postselection Inference in Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2005). False discovery rate: adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 71–81. doi: 10.1198/016214504000001907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R., Brown, L., Buja, A., Zhang, K., & Zhao, L. (2013). Valid postselection inference. The Annals of Statistics, 41(2), 802–837. doi: 10.1214/12-AOS1077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). Bic and alternative bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.856691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and akaike’s information criterion (aic): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345–370. doi: 10.1007/BF02294361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (1992). The little bootstrap and other methods for dimensionality selection in regression: X-fixed prediction error. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 738–754. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (1967). The conditional level of student’s t test. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38(4), 1068–1071. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177698776
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 108–132. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R. J., & Feddersen, A. P. (1963). Note on a conditional property of student’s t. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(3), 1098–1100. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177704034
   Google Scholar
• Buja, A., & Zhang, K. (2017). PoSI: valid postselection inference for linear ls regression [computer software manual]. R package version 1.0. doi:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PoSI
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, P., & van de.Geer, S. (2011). Statistics for high-dimensional data. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camstra, A., & Boomsma, A. (1992). Cross-validation in regression and covariance structure analysis: An overview. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(1), 89–115. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella, G., & Berger, R. (2002). Statistical inference. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charkhi, A., & Claeskens, G. (2018). Asymptotic postselection inference for the akaike information criterion. Biometrika, 105(3), 645–664. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asy018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-Y., & Yao, G. (2015). Measuring quality of life with fuzzy numbers: In the perspectives of reliability, validity, measurement invariance, and feasibility. Quality of Life Research, 24(4), 781–785. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0816-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Liu, J., Xu, G., & Ying, Z. (2015). Statistical analysis of q-matrix based diagnostic classification models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(510), 850–866. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.934827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-P., & Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model modification in covariance structure modeling: A comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and Wald tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 115–136. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Uniform asymptotic inference and the bootstrap after model selection. Psychological Bulletin, 1(112), 155–159. [Mismatch] doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1975). A note on data-splitting for the evaluation of significance levels. Biometrika, 62(2), 441–444. doi: 10.1093/biomet/62.2.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18(2), 147–167. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, D. (1988). On the choice of a model to fit data from an exponential family. The Annals of Statistics, 16(1), 342–355. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, D., Oud, J., & Jansen, R. (1997). Information and other criteria in structural equation model selection. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 26(4), 1477–1516. doi: 10.1080/03610919708813451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., & Yamamoto, M. (2014). Estimation of an oblique structure via penalized likelihood factor analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 79, 120–132. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2014.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., & Yamamoto, M. (2015). Sparse estimation via nonconcave penalized likelihood in factor analysis model. Statistics and Computing, 25(5), 863–875. doi: 10.1007/s11222-014-9458-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjort, N. L., & Claeskens, G. (2003). Frequentist model average estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(464), 879–899. doi: 10.1198/016214503000000828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P.-H. (2017). Asymptotics of aic, bic, and rmsea for model selection in structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 82(2), 407–426. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9572-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.-H. (in press). lslx: Semi-confirmatory structural equation modeling via penalized likelihood. Journal of Statistical Software.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.-H., Chen, H., & Weng, L.-J. (2017). A penalized likelihood method for structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 82(2), 329–354. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. doi: 10.1037/a0014694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobucci, R., Grimm, K. J., & McArdle, J. J. (2016). Regularized structural equation modeling. Structure Equation Modeling, 23(4), 555–566. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1154793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S., & Ankargren, S. (2018). Frequentist model averaging in structural equation modelling. Psychometrika, 84, 84–104. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9624-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(351), 631–639. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10482485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabaila, P., & Leeb, H. (2006). On the large-sample minimal coverage probability of confidence intervals after model selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(474), 619–629. doi: 10.1198/016214505000001140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., Sun, D. L., Sun, Y., & Taylor, J. E. (2016). Exact postselection inference, with application to the lasso. The Annals of Statistics, 44(3), 907–927. doi: 10.1214/15-AOS1371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb, H., & Pötscher, B. M. (2003). The finite-sample distribution of post-model-selection estimators and uniform versus nonuniform approximations. Econometric Theory, 19(1), 100–142. doi: 10.1017/S0266466603191050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb, H., & Pötscher, B. M. (2005). Model selection and inference: Facts and fiction. Econometric Theory, 21(1), 21–59. doi: 10.1017/S0266466605050036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb, H., & Pötscher, B. M. (2006). Can one estimate the conditional distribution of post-model-selection estimators? The Annals of Statistics, 34(5), 2554–2591. doi: 10.1214/009053606000000821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb, H., & Pötscher, B. M. (2008). Can one estimate the unconditional distribution of post-model-selection estimators? Econometric Theory, 24(2), 338–376. doi: 10.1017/S0266466608080158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L.-C., Huang, P.-H., & Weng, L.-J. (2017). Selecting path models in sem: A comparison of model selection criteria. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(6), 855–869. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1363652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., Markovic, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2018). More powerful post-selection inference, with application to the Lasso. ArXiv e-prints.
   Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Campbell, I. (2016). Inference based on the best-fitting model can contribute to the replication crisis: Assessing model selection uncertainty using a bootstrap approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 479–490. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1141355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., Campbell, I., McArtor, D., Miller, P., Luningham, J., & Berg, S. M. V D. (2017). Assessing model selection uncertainty using a bootstrap approach: An update. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 230–245. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1252265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 107–120. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 201–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2901_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinshausen, N., Meier, L., & Bühlmann, P. (2009). values for high-dimensional regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104(488), 1671–1681. p doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meir, A., & Drton, M. (2017). Tractable postselection maximum likelihood inference for the Lasso. ArXiv e-Prints.
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Merkle, E. C. (2012). The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1037/a0026804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: R Core Team. doi:https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvey, S. D. (1959). The lagrangian multiplier test. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30(2), 389–407. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706259
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50(3), 253–263. doi: 10.1007/BF02294104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Ying, Z., & Xin, T. (2016). Latent variable selection for multidimensional item response theory models via l1 regularization. Psychometrika, 81(4), 921–939. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9529-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Robert, T. (2018). Postselection inference for l1-penalized likelihood models. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 46(1), 41–61. doi: 10.1002/cjs.11313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The WHOQOL Taiwan Group. (2005). The user’s manual of the development of the WHOQOL-BREF taiwan version (2nd ed.), Taipei: Taiwan WHOQOL Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression selection and shrinkage via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 58(1), 267–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. J., Rinaldo, A., Tibshirani, R., & Wasserman, L. (2018). Uniform asymptotic inference and the bootstrap after model selection. The Annals of Statistics, 46(3), 1255–1287. doi: 10.1214/17-AOS1584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. J., Taylor, J., Lockhart, R., & Tibshirani, R. (2016). Exact postselection inference for sequential regression procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(514), 600–620. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1108848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafilov, N. T., Fontanella, S., & Adachi, K. (2017). Sparse exploratory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 82(3), 778–794. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9575-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutz, G., & Schauberger, G. (2015). A penalty approach to differential item functioning in rasch models. Psychometrika, 80(1), 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9377-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Geer, S., Bühlmann, P., Ritov, Y., & Dezeure, R. (2014). On asymptotically optimal confidence regions and tests for high-dimensional models. The Annals of Statistics, 42(3), 1166–1202. doi: 10.1214/14-AOS1221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. doi: 10.1037/a0027127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54(3), 426–482. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50(1), 1–25. doi: 10.2307/1912526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Hayashi, K. (2006). Standard errors in covariance structure models: Asymptotics versus bootstrap. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59(2), 397–417. doi: 10.1348/000711005X85896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. H. (2010). Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty. The Annals of Statistics, 38(2), 894–942. doi: 10.1214/09-AOS729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C.-H., & Zhang, S. S. (2014). Confidence intervals for low dimensional parameters in high dimensional linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 76(1), 217–242. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar