Moderated Network Models

References

• Afshartous, D., & Preston, R. A. (2011). Key results of interaction models with centering. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(3). doi:10.1080/10691898.2011.11889620
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A., & Kateri, M. (2011). Categorical data analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_161
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.1057/jors.1994.16
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2017). Matrix: Sparse and dense matrix classes and methods. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix R package version 1.2-8
   Google Scholar
• Bien, J., Taylor, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). A lasso for hierarchical interactions. The Annals of Statistics, 41(3), 1111. doi:10.1214/13-AOS1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5–13. doi:10.1002/wps.20375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, P., & Van De Geer, S. (2011). Statistics for high-dimensional data: Methods, theory and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20192-9
   Google Scholar
• Casella, G., & George, E. I. (1992). Explaining the Gibbs sampler. The American Statistician, 46(3), 167–174. doi:10.2307/2685208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Witten, D. M., & Shojaie, A. (2015). Selection and estimation for mixed graphical models. Biometrika, 102(1), 47–64. doi:10.1093/biomet/asu051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, G., & Epskamp, S. (2017). Estimate group network: Perform the joint graphical Lasso and selects tuning parameters. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=EstimateGroupNetwork R package version 0.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M., Mõttus, R., Waldorp, L. J., & Cramer, A. O. (2015). State of the art personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in r. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, G., Richetin, J., Preti, E., Casini, E., Epskamp, S., & Perugini, M. (2017). Stability and variability of personality networks. A tutorial on recent developments in network psychometrics. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 68–78. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., van Harreveld, F., van den Berg, H., Conner, M., & van der Maas, H. L. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The causal attitude network (can) model. Psychological Review, 123(1), 2. doi:10.1037/a0039802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, P., Wang, P., & Witten, D. M. (2014). The joint graphical lasso for inverse covariance estimation across multiple classes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B Statistical Methodology, 76(2), 373–397. doi:10.1111/rssb.12033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidhof, M. B., Palic, S., Costantini, G., Huisman-van Dijk, H. M., Bockting, C. L., Engelhard, I., … Karstoft, K. I. (2017). Replicability and generalizability of ptsd networks: A cross-cultural multisite study of ptsd symptoms in four trauma patient samples. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 335–351. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/2T7QP
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epskamp, S. (2016). Brief report on estimating regularized Gaussian networks from continuous and ordinal data. ArXiv e-Prints. doi:arXiv:1606.05771
   Google Scholar
• Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian Graphical Model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 453–480. doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, A. J., & McQuillin, S. D. (2010). Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: A presentation of methods and review of current practice. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 53–84. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian Graphical Model. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel & A. Culotta (Eds.), 604–612. Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4087-extended-bayesian-information-criteria-for-gaussiangraphical-models.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3), 432–441. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Mummolo, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, 27, 163–192. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburg, M. A., & Collins, F. S. (2010). The path to personalized medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(4), 301–304. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1006304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslbeck, J. M. B., & Fried, E. I. (2017). How predictable are symptoms in psychopathological networks? A reanalysis of 18 published datasets. Psychological Medicine, 47(16), 2767–2776. doi:10.1017/S0033291717001258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslbeck, J. M. B., & Waldorp, L. J. (2017). mgm: Estimating time-varying mixed graphical models in high-dimensional data. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1510.06871.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2015). Statistical learning with sparsity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/b18401
   Google Scholar
• Higham, N. J. (2002). Computing the nearest correlation matrix—A problem from finance. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 22(3), 329–343. doi:10.1093/imanum/22.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendler, K. S., Aggen, S. H., Flint, J., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). The centrality of dsm and non-dsm depressive symptoms in han Chinese women with major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 739–744. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Vol. 17. ‎Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Lafferty, J., & Wasserman, L. (2009). The nonparanormal: Semiparametric estimation of high dimensional undirected graphs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, 2295–2328. http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v10/liu09a.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., & Luecken, L. J. (2008). How and for whom? Mediation and moderation in health psychology. Health Psychology, 27(2), S99. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. The Annals of Statistics, 34(3), 1436–1462. doi:10.1214/009053606000000281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder, J. A., & Jacob Baker, R. (1972). Generalized linear models. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.2307/2344614
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. doi:10.1177/1745691612462588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych R package version 1.7.3
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• van Borkulo, C., Boschloo, L., Kossakowski, J., Tio, P., Schoevers, R., Borsboom, D., & Waldorp, L. (2016). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. submitted manuscript, 24.
   Google Scholar
• van Borkulo, C. D., Epskamp, S., & Millner, A. (2016). Network comparison test: Statistical comparison of two networks based on three invariance measures. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NetworkComparisonTest R package version 2.0.1
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright, M. J., Jordan, M. I. (2008). Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 1(1–2), 1–305. doi:10.1561/2200000001
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Rast, P. (2018). Back to the basics: Rethinking partial correlation network methodology. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, E., Baker, Y., Ravikumar, P., Allen, G., & Liu, Z. (2014). Mixed graphical models via exponential families. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1042–1050. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v33/yang14a.pdf.
   Google Scholar