Estimating New Quantities from Longitudinal Test Scores to Improve Forecasts of Future Performance

References

• ACT. (2014a). ACT Aspire Summative Assessment Technical Bulletin #1. Iowa City, IA: ACT.
   Google Scholar
• ACT. (2014b). ACT Aspire Summative Assessment Technical Bulletin #2. Iowa City, IA: ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, D. F., & Tavares, H. R. (2005). Item response theory for longitudinal data: Population parameter estimation. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 95(1), 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2016). The discrepancy between measurement and modeling in longitudinal data analysis. In J. R. Harring, L. M. Stapleton & S. N. Beretvas (Eds.), Advances in multilevel modeling for educational research (pp. 3–38). Charlotte, NC. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, N. (1932). A study of the crying of infants during mental and physical tests. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 40, 306–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1932.10532428
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, N. (1943). Skeletal maturing in adolescence as a basis for determining percentage of completed growth. Child Development, 14(1), 1–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1125612
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, N. (1949). Consistency and variability in the growth of intelligence from birth to eighteen years. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 75, 165–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1991.9914714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, S. L., & Sheiner, L. B. (1982). Estimating population kinetics. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 8(3), 195–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J. (1999). The psychology of aging: Theory, research, and interventions. Pacific, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., & Weeks, J. P. (2009). The impact of vertical scaling decisions on growth interpretations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(4), 3–14. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00158.x
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Du Toit, S. H. (2002). A version of quadratic regression with interpretable parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(4), 501–519. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3704_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudzadeh, P. (2016). A statistical evaluation of latent variable score estimation from simple and complex item response models: Implications for integrative data analysis [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, J. E., & Mei, H. H. W. (1979). Two new unconstrained optimization algorithms which use function and gradient values. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 28(4), 453–482. doi:10.1007/BF00932218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PloS One, 10(4), e0121945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D. G., & McNeish, D. M. (2018). Increasing the consequential validity of reading assessment using dynamic measurement modeling: A comment on Dumas and McNeish (2017). Educational Researcher, 47(9), 612–614. doi:10.3102/0013189X18797621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D. G., & McNeish, D. M. (2017). Dynamic measurement modeling: Using nonlinear growth models to estimate student learning capacity. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 284–292. doi:10.3102/0013189X17725747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. G., Resing, W. C., & Beckmann, J. F. (2018). Dynamic assessment: A case of unfulfilled potential? Educational Review, 70(1), 7–17. doi:10.1080/00131911.2018.1396806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin, J. O., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 74–87. doi:10.1177/0734282911428197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R., & Falik, L. H. (2015). Beyond smarter: Mediated learning and the brain’s capacity for change. New York: Teachers College Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/77.5.1500
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–191. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, D. M. (1983). Subroutines for unconstrained minimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 9(4), 503–524. doi:10.1145/356056.356066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., McArdle, J. J., & Widaman, K. F. (2011). Family-level variance in verbal ability change. In K. Trzesniewski, M. B. Donnellan, R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 2019–2229). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harring, J. R., & Liu, J. (2016). A comparison of estimation methods for nonlinear mixed-effects models under model misspecification and data sparseness: A simulation study. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 15(1), 539. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1462076760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. J. (2007). Practical issues in vertical scaling. In N.J. Dorans, M. Pommerich, & P.W. Holland (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 233–251). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, C., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. E. (1938). The California adolescent growth study. The Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 561–567. doi:10.1080/00220671.1938.10880781
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. E. (1939). The adolescent growth study: Procedures. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 3(6), 177–180. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0060864 doi:10.1037/h0060864
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. E. (1939). The adolescent growth study: Principles and methods. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 3(5), 157–159. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0050181 doi:10.1037/h0050181
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. V., & Thissen, D. (2007). A history and overview of psychometrics. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Psychometrics: Vol. 26. Handbook of statistics (pp. 1–28). Amsterdam: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(3), 140–147. doi:10.1177/001698629804200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, N., Peralta, Y., & Bose, M. (2019). Piecewise random-effects modeling software programs. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 156–164. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1516507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. doi:10.1177/1362168810383328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. (1939). The guidance study. Sociometry, 2(3), 1–23. doi:10.2307/2785296
   Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, F., Bowles, R. P., & Meredith, W. (2009). Modeling life-span growth curves of cognition using longitudinal data with multiple samples and changing scales of measurement. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 126–149. doi:10.1037/a0015857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K., & Cascella, P. W. (2008). Eliciting a distal gesture via dynamic assessment among students with moderate to severe intellectual disability. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29(2), 75–81. doi:10.1177/1525740107311821
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2016). Estimation methods for mixed logistic models with few clusters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 790–804. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1236237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Dumas, D. G. (2019). Scoring repeated standardized tests to estimate capacity, not just current ability. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 218–224. doi:10.1177/2372732219862578
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Dumas, D. (2018). Calculating conditional reliability for dynamic measurement model capacity estimates. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55(4), 614–634. doi:10.1111/jedm.12195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Dumas, D. (2017). Nonlinear growth models as measurement models: A second-order growth curve model for measuring potential. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(1), 61–85. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1253451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). Modeling clustered data with very few clusters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(4), 495–518. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1167008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicewander, W. A. (1993). Some relationships between the information function of IRT and the signal/noise ratio and reliability coefficient of classical test theory. Psychometrika, 58(1), 139–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NWEA (2019). MAP® Growth™ Technical Report. Portland, OR: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland, T., Douglas, S., & Kane, H. (2016). Top ten standardized tests used internationally with children and youth by school psychologists in 64 countries: A 24-year follow-up study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(2), 166–176. doi:10.1177/0734282915595303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 155–164. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 3–9. doi:10.1177/0734282911428192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hancock, G. R. (2015). Meaningful aspects of change as novel random coefficients: A general method for reparameterizing longitudinal models. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 84–101. doi:10.1037/met0000028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C., Bakker, M., Pronk, C. M., & Elliott, J. G. (2017). Progression paths in children’s problem solving: The influence of dynamic testing, initial variability, and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 83–109. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (2009). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ngorosho, D., Tantufuye, E., Mbise, A., Nokes, C., … Bundy, D. A. (2002). Assessing intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian school children. Intelligence, 30(2), 141–162. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00091-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1918). The use of intelligence tests in the army. Psychological Bulletin, 15(6), 177–187. doi:10.1037/h0071532
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(3), 124–127. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0064596 doi:10.1037/h0064596
   Google Scholar
• Thum, Y. M., & Hauser, C. H. (2015). NWEA 2015 MAP norms for student and school achievement status and growth. NWEA Research Report. Portland, OR: NWEA.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, A. C., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). The importance of temporal design: How do measurement intervals affect the accuracy and efficiency of parameter estimates in longitudinal research? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 41–55. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.961056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Y., & Kolen, M. J. (2007). Comparisons of methodologies and results in vertical scaling for educational achievement tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(2), 227–253. doi:10.1080/08957340701301207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2011). Final report on the evaluation of the growth model pilot project. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/growth-model-pilot/gmpp-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, G. Y. (2007). Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 399–413. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar