Accommodating a Latent XM Interaction in Statistical Mediation Analysis

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, J. M., Geng, C., & Nelson, S. (2016). Causal mediation analysis with a latent mediator. Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 58(3), 535–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2021). Bayesian estimation of single and multilevel models with latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1761808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytürk, E., Cham, H., Jennings, P. A., & Brown, J. L. (2021). Exploring the performance of latent moderated structural equations approach for ordered-categorical items. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1810047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1937). The statistical conception of mental factors. British Journal of Psychology, 28, 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Marwell, G. (1978). The reliability of products of two random variables. Sociological Methodology, 9, 254–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/270812
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (1998). Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(3), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519809540105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1978.tb00581.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, H., Umbach, N., Kelava, A., & Bollen, K. A. (2020). Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93(3), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cham, H., West, S. G., Ma, Y., & Aiken, L. S. (2012). Estimating latent variable interactions with nonnormal observed data: A comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 840–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.732901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2017). Accuracy of parameter estimates and confidence intervals in moderated mediation models: A comparison of regression and latent moderated structural equations. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 746–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115595869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M., Markell-Goldstein, H. M., Green, J. P., & Chang, Y. (2021). How are we testing interactions in latent variable models? Surging forward or fighting shy? Organizational Research Methods, 24(1), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119872531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K., & Kelcey, B. (2021). Croon’s bias-corrected estimation of latent interactions. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 863–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. G., Kisbu-Sakarya, Y., Miočević, M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2013). Sensitivity plots for confounder bias in the single mediator model. Evaluation Review, 37(5), 405–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croon, M. (2002). Using predicted latent scores in general latent structure models. In G. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure modeling (pp. 195–223). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieger, I., Mayer, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2016). Hypothesis testing using factor score regression: A comparison of four methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(5), 741–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2009). Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 143–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, M. S., Kenny, D. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). The combined effects of measurement error and omitting confounders in the single-mediator model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(5), 681–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgeson, A. R., Valente, M. J., & Gonzalez, O. (2021). Evaluating response shift in statistical mediation analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 251524592110122–251524592110113. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211012271
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L., Elliot, D., Clarke, G. N., MacKinnon, D. P., Moe, E., Zoref, L., Green, C., Wolf, S. L., Greffrath, E., Miller, D. J., & Lapin, A. (1996). Effects of a multidimensional anabolic steroid prevention intervention - The adolescents training and learning to avoid steroids (ATLAS) program. JAMA, 276(19), 1555–1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, O., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2018). A bifactor approach to model multifaceted constructs in statistical mediation analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(1), 5–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, O., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2021). The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions. Psychological Methods, 26(1), 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, O., O’Rourke, H. P., Wurpts, I. C., & Grimm, K. J. (2018). Analyzing Monte Carlo simulation studies with Classification and Regression Trees. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1369353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist, M. N., & Wiley, J. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Liu, M. (2012). Bootstrapping standard errors and data-model fit statistics in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 296–306). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195–222). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y.-Y., Kwok, O. M., & Lai, M. H. (2018). Evaluation of two methods for modeling measurement errors when testing interaction effects with observed composite scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(2), 181–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R package version 0.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix.
   Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., Werner, C. S., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., Cham, H., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear latent variable modeling: Distribution analytic LMS and QML estimators of interaction and quadratic effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.582408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method. American Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• le Cessie, S., Debeij, J., Rosendaal, F. R., Cannegieter, S. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2012). Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator. Epidemiology, 23(4), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318254f5de
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R., & Mislevy, R. J. (2016). Bayesian psychometric modeling. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2021). The impact of measurement error and omitting confounders on statistical inference of mediation effects and tools for sensitivity analysis. Psychological Methods, 26(3), 327–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., West, S. G., Levy, R., & Aiken, L. S. (2017). Tests of simple slopes in multiple regression models with an interaction: Comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(4), 445–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Goldberg, L., Clarke, G. N., Elliot, D. L., Cheong, J., Lapin, A., Moe, E. L., & Krull, J. L. (2001). Mediating mechanisms in a program to reduce intentions to use anabolic steroids and improve exercise self-efficacy and dietary behavior. Prevention Science, 2(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010082828000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Valente, M. J., & Gonzalez, O. (2020). The correspondence between causal and traditional mediation analysis: The link is the mediator by treatment interaction. Prevention Science, 21(2), 147–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Hau, K.-T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 436–458). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miočević, M. (2019). A Tutorial in Bayesian mediation analysis with latent variables. Methodology, 15(4), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miočević, M., Gonzalez, O., Valente, M. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2018). A tutorial on Bayesian potential outcomes mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1342541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2015). Causal effects in mediation modeling: An introduction with applications to latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, J. C., & Chan, W. (2020). Latent moderation analysis: A factor score approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1664304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. Q., Schmid, I., & Stuart, E. A. (2021). Clarifying causal mediation analysis for the applied researcher: Defining effects based on what we want to learn. Psychological Methods, 26(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. In J. Breese & D. Koller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp. 411–420). Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2014). Interpretation and identification of causal mediation. Psychological Methods, 19(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, M. (2003, March). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing (Vol. 124, No. 125.10, pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnhart, J. J., Valente, M. J., Smyth, H. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2021). Statistical mediation analysis for models with a binary mediator and a binary outcome: The differences between causal and traditional mediation analysis. Prevention Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01308-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y.-S., Yajima, M. (2020). R2jags: Using R to Run ′JAGS′. R package version 0.6-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags.
   Google Scholar
• Thernaeau, T., Atkinson, B. (2019). rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1-15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart.
   Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2017). Comparing models of change to estimate the mediated effect in the pretest–posttest control group design. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1274657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M. J., Rijnhart, J. J., Smyth, H. L., Muniz, F. B., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2020). Causal mediation programs in R, M plus, SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(6), 975–984. ) https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1777133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeri, L., Lin, X., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2014). Mediation analysis when a continuous mediator is measured with error and the outcome follows a generalized linear model. Statistics in Medicine, 33(28), 4875–4890. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeri, L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychological Methods, 18(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. J., Valeri, L., & Ogburn, E. L. (2012). The role of measurement error and misclassification in mediation analysis. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 23(4), 561–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. J., & Vansteelandt, S. (2009). Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Statistics and Its Interface, 2(4), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.4310/SII.2009.v2.n4.a7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar