Daily Gender and Cognition: A Person-Specific Behavioral Network Analysis

References

• Antill, J. K., Russell, G., Goodnow, J. J., & Cotton, S. (1993). Measures of children’s sex typing in middle childhood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539308259115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltz, A. M., & Gates, K. M. (2017). Network mapping with GIMME. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(6), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1373014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltz, A. M., Kelly, D. P., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2020). Sex differences in brain and behavioral development. In J. Rubenstein & P. Rakic (Eds.), Neural circuit and cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 585–638). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814411-4.00027-5
   Google Scholar
• Beltz, A. M., Loviska, A. M., & Weigard, A. (2021). Daily gender expression is associated with psychological adjustment for some people, but mainly men. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88279-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C. (2016). Dealing with multiple solutions in structural vector autoregressive models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1151333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Losardo, D., Park, J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (in press). Continuous-time dynamic models: Connections to structural equation models and other discrete-time models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, K. M., Fisher, Z., & Bollen, K. A. (2020). Latent variable GIMME. Psychological Methods, 25(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J. (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1118–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63(1), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, R. H. A., Epskamp, S., & Borsboom, D. (2022). Heterogeneity in individual network analysis: Reality or illusion? Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2128020
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. P., & Beltz, A. M. (2021). Capturing fluctuations in gendered cognition with novel intensive longitudinal measures. Assessment, 28(7), 1813–1827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120952888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. P., & Beltz, A. M. (2022). Spatial skills and self-perceived masculinity: Considering college major STEM-ness, directionality, and gender. Sex Roles, 87(5-6), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01308-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. P., Weigard, A., & Beltz, A. M. (2020). How are you doing? The person-specificity of daily links between neuroticism and physical health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 137, 110194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S. T., Gates, K. M., Fisher, Z., Arizmendi, C., Molenaar, P. C., Hallquist, M. N., Pike, H. K., Henry, T., Duffy, K., Luo, L., Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G., Park, J., Castro Alvarez, S. (2021). Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gimme
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. T., Gates, K. M., Pike, H. K., Beltz, A. M., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, L., Fisher, Z. F., Arizmendi, C., Molenaar, P. C. M., Beltz, A., & Gates, K. M. (2023). Estimating both directed and undirected contemporaneous relations in time series data using hybrid-group iterative multiple model estimation. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000485
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, C. M., & Dementieva, Y. (2017). The contextual specificity of gender: Femininity and masculinity in college students’ same- and other-gender peer contexts. Sex Roles, 76(9-10), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0632-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 2(4), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Beltz, A. M. (2020). Modeling the individual: Bridging nomothetic and idiographic levels of analysis. In A. G. C. Wright & M. N. Hallquist (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 327–336). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316995808.031
   Google Scholar
• Nash, S. C. (1979). Sex role as a mediator of intellectual functioning. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning (pp. 263–302). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S. (2002). Spatial cognition. In H. Pashler & D. Medin (Eds.), Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology: Memory and cognitive processes (pp. 113–163). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2013). Gender-role differences in spatial ability: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 68(9-10), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0269-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2016). Sex and sex-role differences in specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 54, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 858–932). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0314
   Google Scholar
• Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwinski, M. J., Mogle, J. A., Hyun, J., Munoz, E., Smyth, J. M., & Lipton, R. B. (2018). Reliability and validity of ambulatory cognitive assessments. Assessment, 25(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116643164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storms, M. D. (1979). Sex role identity and its relationships to sex role attributes and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.37.10.1779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigard, A. S., Lane, S., Gates, K., & Beltz, A. (2023). The influence of autoregressive relation strength and search strategy on directionality recovery in group iterative multiple model estimation. Psychological Methods, 28(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigard, A. S., Loviska, A. M., & Beltz, A. M. (2021). Little evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00143-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar