SMART Binary: New Sample Size Planning Resources for SMART Studies with Binary Outcome Measurements

References

• Almirall, D., DiStefano, C., Chang, Y.-C., Shire, S., Kaiser, A., Lu, X., Nahum-Shani, I., Landa, R., Mathy, P., & Kasari, C. (2016). Longitudinal effects of adaptive interventions with a speech-generating device in minimally verbal children with ASD. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology : The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 45(4), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1138407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artman, W. J., Nahum-Shani, I., Wu, T., Mckay, J. R., & Ertefaie, A. (2020). Power analysis in a SMART design: Sample size estimation for determining the best embedded dynamic treatment regime. Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 21(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxy064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkeser, D., Díaz, I., Luedtke, A., Segal, J., Scharfstein, D., & Rosenblum, M. (2021). Improving precision and power in randomized trials for COVID‐19 treatments using covariate adjustment, for binary, ordinal, and time‐to‐event outcomes. Biometrics, 77(4), 1467–1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett, D. G., & Price, R. M. (2005). Inferential methods for the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030002213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M. (2018). Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dziak, J. J., Yap, J. R., Almirall, D., McKay, J. R., Lynch, K. G., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2019). A data analysis method for using longitudinal binary outcome data from a SMART to compare adaptive interventions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(5), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1558042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, D. (2017). Field experiments in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062400
   Google Scholar
• Ertefaie, A., Wu, T., Lynch, K. G., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2016). Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes. Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 17(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxv025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P., Nahum-Shani, I., Spring, B., & Chakraborty, B. (2020). Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs). Psychological Methods, 25(2), 182–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, K. M., Seewald, N. J., Tran, Q., Kasari, C., & Almirall, D. (2018). Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. Journal of Applied Statistics, 45(9), 1628–1651. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2017.1386773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbourne, A. M., Smith, S. N., Choi, S. Y., Koschmann, E., Liebrecht, C., Rusch, A., Abelson, J. L., Eisenberg, D., Himle, J. A., Fitzgerald, K., & Almirall, D. (2018). Adaptive School-based Implementation of CBT (ASIC): Clustered-SMART for building an optimized adaptive implementation intervention to improve uptake of mental health interventions in schools. Implementation Science, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0808-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavori, P. W., & Dawson, R. (2000). A design for testing clinical strategies: Biased adaptive within‐subject randomization. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 163(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00154
   Google Scholar
• Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., Nahum‐Shani, I., Kasari, C., Lynch, K. G., Oslin, D. W., Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G., & Almirall, D. (2016). Comparing dynamic treatment regimes using repeated‐measures outcomes: Modeling considerations in SMART studies. Statistics in Medicine, 35(10), 1595–1615. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeika, C. E., Bruhn, A. L., Sterrett, B. I., & McDaniel, S. (2020). Reengineering Tier 2 interventions for responsive decision making: An adaptive intervention process. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 36(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2020.1714855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, S. M., Stuart, E. A., Wang, P., Shadish, W. R., & Steiner, P. M. (2012). Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A. (2005). An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistics in Medicine, 24(10), 1455–1481. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahum-Shani, I., & Almirall, D. (2019). An introduction to adaptive interventions and SMART designs in education. NCSER 2020-001. National Center for Special Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Nahum-Shani, I., Almirall, D., Yap, J. R., McKay, J. R., Lynch, K. G., Freiheit, E. A., & Dziak, J. J. (2020). SMART longitudinal analysis: A tutorial for using repeated outcome measures from SMART studies to compare adaptive interventions. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahum-Shani, I., Dziak, J. J., Walton, M. A., & Dempsey, W. (2022). Hybrid experimental designs for intervention development: What, why and how. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(3), 251524592211142. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221114279
   Google Scholar
• Nahum-Shani, I., Hekler, E., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2015). Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: A pragmatic framework. Health Psychology, 34, 1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahum-Shani, I., Qian, M., Almirall, D., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, B., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Yu, J., & Murphy, S. A. (2012). Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivier, J., May, W. L., & Bell, M. L. (2017). Relative effect sizes for measures of risk. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(14), 6774–6781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2015.1134575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, M. E., Boatman, J. A., Morrell, N., Wagner, A. C., Lyden, G. R., Nahum-Shani, I., King, C. A., Bonar, E. E., Lee, C. M., Larimer, M. E., Vock, D. M., & Almirall, D. (2020). A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) protocol for empirically developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college student drinking reduction. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 96, 106089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfammatter, A. F., Nahum-Shani, I., DeZelar, M., Scanlan, L., McFadden, H. G., Siddique, J., Hedeker, D., & Spring, B. (2019). SMART: Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized controlled trial to optimize weight loss management. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 82, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2019.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkuyeh, D. K., & Beik, F. P. A. (2018). An explicit formula for the inverse of arrowhead and doubly arrow matrices. International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 4(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-018-0527-5
   Google Scholar
• Seewald, N. J., Kidwell, K. M., Nahum-Shani, I., Wu, T., McKay, J. R., & Almirall, D. (2020). Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 29(7), 1891–1912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219877520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanger, C., Scherer, E. A., Vo, H. T., Babbin, S. F., Knapp, A. A., McKay, J. R., & Budney, A. J. (2020). Working memory training and high magnitude incentives for youth cannabis use: A SMART pilot trial. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 34(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Véronneau, M.-H., Dishion, T. J., Connell, A. M., & Kavanagh, K. (2016). A randomized, controlled trial of the family check-up model in public secondary schools: Examining links between parent engagement and substance use progressions from early adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(6), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, A. J., & Altman, D. G. (2001). Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 323(7321), 1123–1124. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar