A Comparative Morphological and Physiological Study of the Species of Dipodascus

LITERATURE CITED

• Alexopoulos, C. J. 1952. Introductory mycology, i-xi. 1–482. New York. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bessey, E. A. 1935. A text book of mycology, i-xv. 1–495. Philadelphia. Blakiston.
   Google Scholar
• Bessey, E. A.. 1950. Morphology and taxonomy of fungi, i-ix. 1–791. Philadelphia and Toronto. Blakiston.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, Rosemary. 1937. Dipodascus uninucleatus. Mycologia 29: 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Brefeld, O. 1891. Die Hemiasci und die Ascomyceten. Untersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiete der Mykologie 9: 94–108.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, Paul. 1928a. Ergebnisse der Symbiose Forschung. 1–129. In Ergebnisse der Biologie. 1–717. 293 figs. Berlin. J. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, Paul. 1928b. Holznabrung und Symbiose (Wood nutrition and symbiosis). 1–64. 22 figs. Berlin. J. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, Paul. 1953. Endosymbiose der Tiere mit Pflanzlichen Mikroorganismen. (Lehrbücher und Monographien aus dem Gebiete der exakten Wissenschaften.) Reihe der Experimentellen Biologie Bd. 12: 1–771. Basel. Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, J. W. 1956. The cellophane technique for studying morphology and fusions in fungi. Mycologia 48: 450–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangeard, P. A. 1904. Recherches sur le développement du périthèce chez les ascomycètes. Botaniste 9: 59–158.
   Google Scholar
• Dangeard, P. A.. 1907. Recherches sur le développement du périthèce chez lcs ascomycètes. Botaniste 10: 1–385.
   Google Scholar
• Delacroix, G., and A. Maublanc. 1916. Maladies des plantes cultivées (Maladies parasitaires). 1–447. ed. 2. Paris. Baillière et Fils.
   Google Scholar
• Dulaney, E. L., and F. G. Grutter. 1950. A note on the culture of Dipodascus uninucleatus in defined media. Mycologia 42: 654–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francke-Grosmann, Helene. 1952. Ueber die Ambrosiazucht der beiden Kiefernborkenkäfer Myclophilus minor Htg. und Ips acuminatus Gyll. Meddel. Statens Skogsforskningsinst. Stockh. 41(6): 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gäumann, E. 1926. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pilze, i-x. 1–626. Jena. G. Fisher.
   Google Scholar
• Gäumann, E.. 1928. Comparative morphology of fungi. Translated and revised by C. W. Dodge, i–xiv. 1–701. New York. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gäumann, E.. 1952. The fungi. Translated by F. L. Wynd. 1–420. New York. Hafner Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gwynne-Vaughn, H. C. I., and B. Barnes. 1927. The structure and development of the fungi, i-xvi. 1–384. Cambridge. The University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmeister, E. R. 1953. Trypan blue as a nuclear stain for plant material. Stain Techn. 28: 309, 310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtermann, C. 1898. Mycologische Untersuchungen aus den Tropen, i-viii. 1–122. 12 pl. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, H. G. 1897. The ambrosia beetles of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr. Div. Ent. Bull. 7: 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. J. 1953. Conidiophores, conidia, and classification. Canad. Jour. Bot. 31: 577–659.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique, i-xi. 1–523. New York. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, H. O. 1902. Ueber Zellinhalt, Befruchtung, und Sporenbildung bei Dipodascus. Flora 91: 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, H. O.. 1921. Cytologische Pilzstudien II. Zur Kenntnis einiger Hemiasceen. Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Sei. Upsal. IV. 5(5): 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Keitt, G. W. 1915. Simple technique for isolating single spore strains of certain types of fungi. Phytopathology 5: 266–269.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayasi, Y. 1950. On the Dipodascaceae. Jap. Jour. Bot. 25: 161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayasi (Kobayashi), Y. 1953a. Yeasts and molds in the trunk exudations. National Science Museum (Tokyo) Bull. 33: 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, R. 1883. Ueber die neuen Untersuchungsmethoden zum Nachweis der Mikrokosmen in Boden, Luft und Wasser. Reprinted in Ges. Werke von R. Koch 1: 274–284. Berlin, 1912. (Cited from McNew, G. L., in Phytopathology 28: 387–401.)
   Google Scholar
• Korf, R. P. 1957. Dipodascus albidus forma minor. Sydowia Beih. 1: 285–288.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerheim, G. 1892. Eine neue geschlectliche Hemiascae, Dipodascus albidus. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 24: 549–565.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerheim, G.. 1894. Le Dipodascus albidus, nouvel Hemiascus à reproduction sexuelle (Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 24: 549–565). Traduct. du Dr. R. Ferry. Rev. Mycol. 16: 45–52. pl. 140.
   Google Scholar
• Lanjouw, J., and F. A. Stafleu. 1956. Index Herbariorum. I. The Herbaria of the world. ed. 3. Regnum Vegetabile 6: 1–224.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J. G. 1940. Insect transmission of plant diseases, i-xi. 1–615. New York. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lindau, G. 1900. Hemiascineae. In Engler, A., und K. Prantl. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien I 1(2): 531.
   Google Scholar
• Lindau, G.. 1905. Hemiasci. In Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg 7(1): 1. Leipzig. Gebrüder Borntraeger.
   Google Scholar
• Lodder, J., and N. J. W. Kreger-van Rij. 1952. The Yeasts, a taxonomic study, i-xi. 1–713. New York. North Holland Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. W. 1937. New or noteworthy fungi from Panama and Colombia. I. Mycologia 29: 618–625.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. W.. 1954. Key to the families of fungi. In Ainsworth, G. C., and G. R. Bisby. A dictionary of the fungi, ed. 4. i–vii. 1–475. Kew. Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, W. J. 1943. A simple technique for isolating spores of various fungi from exposed slides in aerobiological work. Phytopathology 33: 75–76.
   Google Scholar
• McNew, G. L. 1938. Dispersion and growth of bacterial cells suspended in agar. Phytopathology 28: 387–401.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, Fernand. 1954. Les Champignons; Physiologie, Morphologie, Développement et Systématique. II. Systématique. Encyclopédie Mycologique 23: 1259–1278.
   Google Scholar
• Nannfeldt, J. A. 1932. Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nichtlichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsal. IV 8(2): 1–368.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, W. 1899. The physiology of plants. Translated and edited by A. J. Ewart. ed. 2. 1: i–xii. 1–632. Oxford. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgway, R. 1912. Color standards and color nomenclature. 1–43, illus. Washington, D. C.
   Google Scholar
• Schröter, J. 1897. Hemiascineae. In Engler, A., und K. Prantl. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien I 1(1): 143–149. Leipzig. W. Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Stelling-Dekker, N. M. 1931. Die sporogenen Hefen. Verhandel. Koninkl. Akad. Wetenschap. Afd. Natuurk. II. 28: i–vii. 1–547.
   Google Scholar
• Varitchak, Bogdan. 1928. L'évolution nucleaire chez Ascoidea rubescens Brefeld. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 186: 96–98.
   Google Scholar
• Varitchak, Bogdan. 1931. Contribution à l'étude du développement des Ascomycètes. Botaniste 23: 1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wickerham, L. J. 1951. Taxonomy of yeasts. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. 1029: 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wickerham, L. J., and K. A. Burton. 1948. Carbon assimilation tests for the classification of yeasts. Jour. Bact. 56: 363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, W. L. 1942. A new hemiascomycete. Can. Jour. Res. C 20: 389–395.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. A., and F. T. Wolf. 1947. The fungi. Vol. I. i–x. 1–438. New York. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar