LITERATURE CITED
- Brefeld, O. 1883. Botanische Untersuchungen über Hefenpilze. Untersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiet der Mykologie V. Die Brandpilze I. vi + 22 p. Leipzig.
- Christensen, J. J., and H. A. Rodenhiser. 1940. Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut fungi. Bot. Rev. 6: 389–425.
- Conners, I. L. 1954. The organism causing dwarf bunt of wheat. Can. Jour. Bot. 32: 426–431.
- De Bary, A. H. 1866. Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten und Myxomyceten. In W. Hoffmeister: Handbuch der Physiologischen Botanik 2. xii + 316 p.
- Duran, Ruben, and G. W. Fischer. 1961. The Genus Tilletia. 138 p. + 64 figs. Washington State University, Pullman, Wash.
- Fischer, G. W. 1936. The susceptibility of certain wild grasses to Tilletia triticii and T. levis. Phytopathology 26: 867–886.
- Fischer, G. W.. 1951. A local, winter-time epidemic of blister smut, Entyloma crastophyllum, on Kentucky bluegrass at Pullman, Washington. Plant Disease Reporter 35: 88.
- Fischer, G. W.. 1952. Tilletia brevifaciens sp. nov. causing dwarf bunt of wheat and certain grasses. Res. Stud. St. Coll. Wash. 20: 11–14.
- Fischer, G. W., and C. S. Holton. 1957. Biology and control of the smut fungi, x + 622 p., 107 figs. Ronald Press, New York.
- Govindu, H. C., and G. W. Fischer. 1962. Physiologic variation in the stripe smut of grasses, Ustilago striiformis. Res. Stud. State Coll. Wash. 30: 139–168.
- Griffiths, David. 1902. Concerning some west American fungi. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 29: 290–301.
- Halisky, P. M. 1965. Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut fungi. III. Bot. Rev. 31: 114–150.
- Hansing, E. D., and C. L. Lefebvre. 1941. Smut fungi from ovarial and staminal tissues of certain grasses. Phytopathology 31: 1043–1046.
- Holm, L. 1961. Some viewpoints on the evolution of the Ustilaginales. Sv. Bot. Tidsk. 55: 585–590.
- Holton, C. S. 1953. Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut fungi. II. Bot. Rev. 19: 187–208.
- Kellerman, W. A., and W. T. Swingle. 1889. New species of Kansas fungi. Jour. Mycol. 5: 11–14.
- Kendrick, E. L. 1957. The production of teliospores of Tilletia caries in culture. Phytopathology 47: 674–676.
- Kühn, J. 1874. Tilletia controversa. Hedwigia 13: 188.
- Narasimhan, M. J., M. J. Thirumalachar, M. C. Scrinivasan, and H. C. Govindu. 1963. Georgefischeria, a new genus of the Ustilaginales. Mycologia 55: 30–34.
- Preminger, T. 1937. Durch Maisbrand (Ustilago maydis) bedingte Dermatomykose. Arch. Derm. Syph., Berl. 176: 108–113.
- Savile, D. B. O. 1954. Cellular mechanics, taxonomy and evolution in the Uredinales and Ustilaginales. Mycologia 46: 736–761.
- Savile, D. B. O.. 1955. A phylogeny of the basidiomycetes. Can. Jour. Bot. 33: 60–104.
- Savile, D. B. O., and J. A. Calder. 1953. Phylogeny of Carex in the light of parasitism by the smut fungi. Can. Jour. Bot. 31: 164–174.
- Trione, E. J. 1964. Isolation and in vitro culture of the wheat bunt fungi, Tilletia caries and T. controversa. Phytopathology 54: 592–596.
- Ulbrich, E. 1931. Über eigenartige alliophylle Riesenformen von Anemone nemorosa L. mit Urocystis-Befall. Notizble. Bot. Gartens und Museums zu Berlin-Dahlem 2: 128–134.
- Vaheedudin, S. 1942. The pathogenicity and genetics of some sorghum smuts. Minn. Agric. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 154.