Evaluation of infection with endophytes in seeds of forage species with different levels of ploidy

References

• Alvarez-Loayza P, White Jr JF, Gil N, Svenning JC, Balslev H, Kristiansen T 2008. Light converts endosymbiotic fungus to pathogen, influencing seedling survival and host tree recruitment 2. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1908/version/1 (accessed 20 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Amigone MA, Tomaso JC 2006. Principales características de especies y cultivares de verdeos invernales. Informe para Extensión. http://inta.gob.ar/documentos/principales-caracteristicas-de-especies-y-cultivares-de-verdeos-invernales/ (accessed 16 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Andrés AN, De Battista JJ, Ivancovich AJ 2000. Mejoramiento y evaluación de raigrás anual. Reunión Anual de Forrajeras, Pergamino, Argentina, 30 de octubre de 2000. Pp. 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barcellini L 2010. Evaluación de poblaciones de Bromus spp. (Secc. Ceratochloa). II—Nivel de ploidía, fenología y persistencia. Tesis inédita de grado, Balcarce, Argentina, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. 33 p.
   Google Scholar
• Beltramino HJ, Medvescigh JC, De Battista JJ, Costa M 2005. Efecto del hongo endófito Neotyphodium occultans en la producción de semilla de raigrás anual. RCA. Revista Científica Agropecuaria 9: 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bylin A 2014. Endophytic fungi in meadow fescue and other forage grasses. Doctoral thesis. Umeå, Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden. 56 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral D, Cafaro MJ, Saidman B, Lugo M, Reddy PV, White Jr JF 1999. Evidence supporting the occurrence of a new species of endophyte in some South American grasses. Mycologia 91: 315–325.10.2307/3761376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos JMS, Davide LC, Salgado CC, Santos FC, Costa PN, Silva PS et al. 2009. In vitro induction of hexaploid plants from triploid hybrids of Pennisetum purpureum and Pennisetum glaucum. Plant Breeding 128: 101–104.10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke BB, White Jr JF, Hurley RH, Torres MS, Sun S, Huff DR 2006. Endophyte-mediated suppression of dollar spot disease in fine fescues. Plant Disease 90: 994–998.10.1094/PD-90-0994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay K 1988. Fungal endophytes of grasses: a defensive mutualism between plants and fungi. Ecology 69: 10–16.10.2307/1943155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay K 1993. The ecology and evolution of endophytes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 44: 39–64.10.1016/0167-8809(93)90038-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay K, Schardl C 2002. Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. The American Naturalist 160: 99–127.10.1086/342161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colabelli MN, Clausen AM, De Battista J, Costa M, Torres MS, Re A et al. 2007. Incidencia de endófitos tipo Neotyphodium en forrajeras nativas y naturalizadas e impacto agronómico en Lolium multiflorum Lam. en la Argentina. Avances de Investigación de Recursos Genéticos en el Cono Sur II. IICA-PROCISUR, Montevideo, Uruguay. Pp. 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Devo MA 2012. Efecto de la duplicación cromosómica sobre caracteres vegetativos y reproductivos de una población naturalizada de Lolium multiflorum Lam. Tesis inédita de grado. Balcarce, Argentina, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gillet M 1983. Las gramíneas forrajeras: descripción, funcionamiento, aplicaciones al cultivo de la hierba. Zaragoza, España, Acribia. 354 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel PE, Batista WB, Texeira M, Martinez-Ghersa MA, Omacini M, Ghersa CM 2008. Neotyphodium endophyte infection frequency in annual grass populations: relative importance of mutualism and transmission efficiency. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275: 897–905.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01978.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez HF, Pensiero JF 1998. Sinopsis de las especies argentinas del género Bromus (Poaceae). Darwiniana, nueva serie 35: 75–114.
   Google Scholar
• Herre EA, Mejía LC, Kyllo DA, Rojas E, Maynard Z, Butler A 2007. Ecological implications of anti-pathogen effects of tropical fungal endophytes and mycorrhizae. Ecology 88: 550–558.10.1890/05-1606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys M 1991. Genetic control of physiological response—a necessary relationship. Functional Ecology 5: 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannone LJ, Cabral D, Schardl CL, Rossi MS 2009. Phylogenetic divergence, morphological and physiological differences distinguish a new Neotyphodium endophyte species in the grass Bromus auleticus from South America. Mycologia 101: 340–351. http://www.mycologia.org/content/101/3/340.full.pdf+html ( accessed 26 November 2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannone LJ, White Jr JF, Giussani LM, Cabral D, Novas MV 2011. Diversity and distribution of Neotyphodium-infected grasses in Argentina. Mycological Progress 10: 9–19.10.1007/s11557-010-0669-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Semillas (INASE) 2012. Registro de Variedades. Catálogo Nacional de Cultivares 2012. http://www.inase.gov.ar/consultaGestion/gestiones ( accessed 15 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kuldau G, Bacon C 2008. Clavicipitaceous endophytes: their ability to enhance resistance of grasses to multiple stresses. Biological Control 46: 57–71.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowski DP, Belesky DP 2006. Ecological importance of Neotyphodium spp. grass endophytes in agroecosystems. Grassland Science 52: 1–14.10.1111/j.1744-697X.2006.00041.x
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski MP, Belesky DP, Lewis GC 2005. Abiotic Neotyphodium stresses in endophytic grasses. In: Roberts C, West CP, Spiers DE eds. Neotyphodium in cool-season grasses. Ames, OH, Blackwell Publishing. Pp. 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Nair RM 2004. Developing tetraploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) populations. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 45–49.10.1080/00288233.2004.9513569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RC, Davide LC, Techio VH, Timbó ALO 2012. Duplicação cromossômica de gramíneas forrageiras: uma alternativa para programas de melhoramento genético. Ciência Rural 42: 1278–1285. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782012000700023&lng=en&tlng=pt.%2010.1590/S0103-84782012000700023 ( accessed 28 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Peretti A 1994. Manual para análisis de semillas. Buenos Aires, Argentina, Hemisferio Sur. 281 p.
   Google Scholar
• Piontelli E, Toro M 1992. Endófitos fúngicos en comunidades de pastos naturales: distribución en algunas especies de Lolium, Festuca, Bromus y Stipa. Revista Simiente 63: 127.
   Google Scholar
• Popay AJ 2009. Insect herbivory and defensive mutualism between plants and fungi. In: White Jr JF, Torres MS eds. Defensive mutualism in microbial symbiosis. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. Pp. 347–358.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 3 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CA, West CP, Spiers DE 2005. Neotyphodium in cool-season grasses. Oxford, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez R, White Jr JF, Arnold AE, Redman RS 2009. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytologist 182: 314–330.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha CD, Jackson MA, Johnson Cicalese JM 1988. A rapid staining method for detection of endophytic fungi in turf and forage grass. Phytopathology 78: 237–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schardl CL, Leuchtmann A, Spiering MJ 2004. Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 315–340.10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel MR, Latch GCM, Johnson MC 1987. Fungal endophytes of grasses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 25: 293–315.10.1146/annurev.py.25.090187.001453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres MS, White JF Jr, Zhang X, Hinton DM, Bacon CW 2012. Endophyte-mediated adjustments in host morphology and physiology and effects on host fitness traits in grasses. Fungal Ecology 5: 322–330.10.1016/j.funeco.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JF Jr 1987. Whe widespread distribution of endophytes in Poaceae. Plant Disease 71: 340–342.10.1094/PD-71-0340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JF Jr, Torres MS 2010. Is plant endophyte-mediated defensive mutualism the result of oxidative stress protection? Physiologia Plantarum 138: 440–446.
   Google Scholar
• Zabalgogeazcoa I 2008. Fungal endophytes and their interaction with plant pathogens. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar