Effects of amylase and glucoamylase on rehydrated corn ensiled for an extended period: nutritive value, fermentation profile, and amylolytic activity

References

• Arcari MA, Martins CMMR, Tomazi T, Santos MV. 2016. Effect of the ensiling time of hydrated ground corn on silage composition and in situ starch degradability. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 53:60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 2000. Official method of analysis. 7th ed. Gaithersburg: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Baron VS, Stevenson KR, Buchanan-Smith JG. 1986. Proteolysis and fermentation of corn grain ensiled at several levels and under several simulated storage methods. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 66:451–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton JR, Klopfenstein T, Erickson GE. 2005. Effects of corn moisture and length of ensiling on dry matter digestibility and rumen degradable protein. Nebraska Beef Cattle Rep. 42:31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho BF, Ávila CLS, Bernardes TF, Pereira MN, Santos C, Schwan RF. 2016. Fermentation profile and identification of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts of rehydrated corn kernel silage. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 122:589–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho RV, Côrrea TLR, Silva JCM, Mansur LRCO, Martins MLL. 2008. Properties of an amylase from thermophilic bacillus sp. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 39:102–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain DG. 1987. The silage fermentation in relation to the utilisation of nutrients in the rumen. Process Biochemistry. 4:60–63.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson TE, Rust SR, Yokoyama MT. 1998. Improved fermentation and aerobic stability of ensiled, high moisture corn with the use of Propionibacterium acidipropionici. Journal of Dairy Science. 81:1015–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding MI, Koizumi H, Suzuki Y. 1995. Comparison of three chromatographic systems determination of organic acids in wine. Analytical Sciences. 11:239–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin ES, Marco GJ, Emery EM. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science. 44:1768–1771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretto LF, Fredin SM, Shaver RD. 2015. Influence of ensiling, exogenous protease addition, and bacterial inoculation on fermentation profile, nitrogen fractions, and ruminal in vitro starch digestibility in rehydrated and high-moisture corn. Journal of Dairy Science. 98:7318–7327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldager J. 1977. Protein requirement and non-protein nitrogen for high producing cow in early lactation (PhD Diss). Michigan State University, East Lasing.
   Google Scholar
• Gandra JR, Oliveira ER, Takiya CS, Del Valle TA, Rennó FP, Goes RHTB, Leite RSR, Garcia NFL, Batista JDO, Acosta AP, et al. 2019. Amylolytic activity and chemical composition of rehydrated ground maise ensiled with α-amylase or glucoamylase. Journal of Agricultural Science. 157:449–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannesi GC, Polizeli MLTM, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA. 2006. A novel α-glucosidase from Chaetomium thermophilum var. coprophilum that converts maltose into trehalose: purification and partial characterisation of the enzyme. Process Biochemistry. 41:1729–1735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix DL. 1993. Rapid extraction and analysis of nonstructural carbohydrates in plant-tissues. Crop Science. 33:1306–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman PC, Esser NM, Shaver RD, Coblentz WK, Scott MP, Bodnar AL, Schmidt RJ, Charley RC. 2011. Influence of ensiling time and inoculation on alteration of the starch-protein matrix in high-moisture corn. Journal of Dairy Science. 94:2465–2474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden LA. 1999. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Dairy Science. 82:1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari-Aghdam J, Khajek K, Ranjbar B, Nemat-Gorgani M. 2005. Deglycosylation of glucoamylase from Aspergillus Niger: effects on structure, activity and stability. BBA Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. 1750:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobim CC, Nussio LG, Reis RA, Schmidt P. 2007. Methodological advances in evaluation of preserved forage quality. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 36:101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Jobim CC, Reis RA, Schoken-Iturrino RP, Rosa B. 1999. Microorganism development during feed-out of high-moisture corn and corn-ears silages. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. 21:671–676.
   Google Scholar
• Junges D, Morais G, Spoto MHF, Santos PS, Adesogan AT, Nussio LG, Daniel JLP. 2017. Short communication: influence of various proteolytic sources during fermentation of reconstituted corn grain silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 100:9048–9051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasek G. 1972. A micromethod for determination of urea in plasma, whole blood and blood cells using urease and phenol reagent. Polskie Archiwum Weterynaryjne. 15:801–810.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawton JW. 2002. Zein: A history of processing and use. Cereal Chemistry. 79:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin WL, Felberg RS, Clark EB. 1993. Kinetics of cell growth and heterologous glucoamylase production in recombinant Aspergillus nidulans. Biotechnology & Bioengineering. 41:273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes NM. 2016. Efeito de enzimas na digestibilidade ruminal e perda de matéria seca da silagem do grão de milho reidratado. (PhD Diss). Federal University of Lavras, Lavras.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The biochemistry of silage, 2.ed. Merlow: Chalcomb Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller GL. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry. 31:426–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais MG, Ítavo CCBF, Ítavo LCV, Bungenstab DJ, Ribeiro CB, Oliveira LB, Silva JÁ. 2012. Inoculation of corn high moisture silages, in different processing. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Produção Animal. 13:969–981.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39:183–191.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Washington: Nat. Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzian D, Akbarzadeh A, Sharer JM, Moo-Yourg M. 2006. Fungal glucoamylases. Biotechnology Advances. 24:80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira APA, Silvestre MA, Alves-Prado HF, Rodrigues A, Paz MF, Fonseca GG, Leite RSR. 2015. Bioprospecting of yeasts for amylase production in solid state fermentation and evaluation of the catalytic properties of enzymatic extracts. African Journal of Biotechnology. 14:1215–1223.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira ER, Takiya CS, Del Valle TA, Rennó FP, Goes RHTB, Leite RSR, Oliveira KMP, Batista JDO, Araki HMC, Damiani J, et al. 2019. Effects of exogenous amylolytic enzymes on fermentation, nutritive value, and in vivo digestibility of rehydrated corn silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 251:86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroso AF, Nussio LG, Paziani SF, Loures DRS, Igarasi MS, Coelho RM, Packer IH, Horii J, Gomes LH. 2005. Fermentation and epiphytic microflora dynamics in sugar cane silage. Scientia Agrícola. 62:427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira Filho IA, Borghi E. 2016. Mercado de Sementes de Milho no Brasil Safra 2016/2017. Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, 2016. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pires AV, Susin I, Simas JMC, Santos FAP, Mendes CQ, Oliveira Junior RC, Fernandes JJR, Araujo RC. 2008. Replacement of corn silage by chopped sugarcane plus whole cottonseed on ruminal parameters, microbial protein production, and nutrient digestibility in lactating cows. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 9:50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues PHM, Senatore AL, Andrade SJT, Ruzante JM, Lucci CS, Lima FR. 2002. Effects of microbial inoculants on chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of sorghum silage. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 31:2373–2379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MA, Brown TM, Brandlb KW, Judya TY, Herrickc RT, Halesb WE, Watson ET, Kononoff PJ. 2019. Use of indirect calorimetry to evaluate utilization of energy in lactating Jersey dairy cattle consuming common coproducts. Journal of Dairy Science. 102:320–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva N, Junqueira VCA, Silveira NFA. 1997. Manual de métodos de análise microbiológica de alimentos, Livraria Varela, São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Silva NC, Nascimento CF, Nascimento FA, Resende FD, Daniel JLP, Siqueira GR. 2018. Fermentation and aerobic stability of rehydrated corn grain silage treated with different doses of Lactobacillus buchneri or a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici. Journal of Dairy Science. 101:4158–4167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takiya CS, Calomeni GD, Silva TH, Vendramini THA, Silva GG, Consentini CE, Bertoni JC, Zilio EMC, Renno FP. 2017. Increasing dietary doses of an Aspergillus oryzae extract with alpha-amylase activity on nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation of lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 228:159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theurer CB, Lozano O, Alio A, Delgado-Elorduy A, Sadik M, Huber JT, Zinn RA. 1999. Steam-processed corn and sorghum grain flaked at different densities alter ruminal, small intestinal, and total tract digestibility of starch by steers. Journal of Animal Science. 77:2824–2831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 18:104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilio EMC, Del Valle TA, Ghizzi LG, Takiya CS, Dias MSS, Nunes AT, Silva GG, Renno FP. 2019. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic and amylolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation and performance of mid-lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 102:4179–4189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar