Assessing the completeness of inventories of vascular epiphytes and climbing plants in Chilean swamp forest remnants

References

• Bartel S, Chen H. 2012. Mechanisms regulating epiphytic plant diversity. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 31:391–400. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2012.680349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzing D. 1990. Vascular epiphytes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks T, da Fonseca G, Rodrigues A. 2004. Species, data, and conservation planning. Conservation Biol. 18:1682–1688. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower J, Zar J, Von Ende C. 1990. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. Dubuque: Brown Company Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte M, Murray B, Lovett–Doust J. 2006. Ecological patterns and biological invasions: using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biol Invasions. 8:809–821. doi: 10.1007/s10530-005-3839-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carignan V, Villard M. 2002. Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review. Environmental Monit Assess. 78:45–61. doi: 10.1023/A:1016136723584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A. 1984. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat. 11:265–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A. 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics. 43:783–91. doi: 10.2307/2531532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A, Shen T. 2006. Species Prediction and Diversity Estimation (SPADE) [Software and User’s Guide]. [cited 2016 July 24]. Available from: http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/software/SPADE_UserGuide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chao A, Shen T, Hwang W. 2006. Application of Laplace’s boundary-mode approximations to estimate species and shared species richness. Aust NZ J Stat. 48:117–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.00430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Palmer M. 2005. The inventory and estimation of plant species richness. Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell R. 2013. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User's Guide and application. [cited 2016 July 24]. Available from: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
   Google Scholar
• Colwell R, Chao A, Gotelli N, Lin S, Mao Ch, Chazdon R, Longino J. 2012. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol. 5:3–21. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtr044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell R, Coddington J. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos T Roy Soc B: Biol Sci. 345:101–18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft M, Crow-Fraser P. 2009. Non-random sampling and its role in habitat conservation: a comparison of three wetland macrophyte sampling protocols. Biodivers Conserv. 18:2283–2306. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9588-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Castri F, Hajek E. 1976. Bioclimatología de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universidad Católica de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckman M, Kühne A, Isermann M. 2007. Random vs non-random sampling: effects on patterns of species abundance, species richness and vegetation-environment relationships. Folia Geobot. 42:179–190. doi: 10.1007/BF02893884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem J, Lichtenstein J. 1959. Las Himenofiláceas del área argentino-chilena del sud. Darwiniana. 11:611–760.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez F, Rebelo A, Bitmann R. 2012. How plant inventories improve future monitoring. Biodiversity Conservation. 21:1937–1951. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0286-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ezcurra C, Brion C. 2005. Plantas del Nahuel Huapi. Catálogo de flora vascular del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Bariloche, Argentina: Universidad Nacional del Comahue.
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Palacios A, García-Franco J. 2001. Sampling methods for vascular epiphytes: their effectiveness in recording species richness and frequency. Selvyana. 22:181–191.
   Google Scholar
• Funk V. 2006. Floras: a model for biodiversity studies or a thing of the past? Taxon. 55:581–588. doi: 10.2307/25065635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianoli E, Saldaña A, Jiménez-Castillo M, Valladares F. 2010. Distribution and abundance of vines along the light gradient in a southern temperate rain forest. J Veg Sci. 21:66–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gissi N. 2004. Segregación espacial mapuche en la ciudad: ¿Negación o revitalización identitaria. Revista de Urbanismo, N°9, Departamento de Urbanismo, Universidad de Chile. Santiago de Chile. [cited 2016 July 24]. Available from: http://web.uchile.cl/vignette/revistaurbanismo/CDA/urb_complex/0,1311,SCID%253D6418%2526ISID%253D315%2526IDG%253D2%2526ACT%253D0%2526PRT%253D6416,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli N, Colwell R. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett. 4:379–391. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli N, Colwell R. 2011. Frontiers in measuring biodiversity. New York: Oxford University Press. Chapter 4, Estimating species richness; p. 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Brathen K, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A, Leps J, Lindborg R, Moora M, Partel M, et al. 2012. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev. 87:111–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00187.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauenstein E, Peña-Cortés F, Bertrán C, Tapia J, Vargas-Chacoff L, Urrutia O. 2014. Composición florística y evaluación de la degradación del bosque pantanoso costero de temu-pitra en la Región de La Araucanía, Chile. Gayana Bot. 71:43–57. doi: 10.4067/S0717-66432014000100008
   Google Scholar
• Hermoso V, Kennard M, Linke S. 2013. Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it? Plos One. 8:e59662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortal J, Borges P, Gaspar C. 2006. Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. J Anim Ecol. 75:274–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01048.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortal J, Lobo J, Jiménez-Valverde A. 2007. Limitations of biodiversity databases: case study on seed-plant diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Conserv Biol. 21:853–863. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00686.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPNI. 2008. The international plant names index [cited 2016 July 24]. Available from: http://www.ipni.org/
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2010. Standards and petitions subcommittee. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 8.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee in March 2010. [cited 2016 July 24]; Available from: http://www.plants2020.net/document/0175/
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Castillo M, Wiser S, Lusk C. 2007. Elevation parallels of latitudinal variation in the proportion of lianas in woody floras. J Biogeogr. 34:163–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal J. 2003. Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. 8:151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kenkel N, Juhász-Nagy P, Podani J. 1989. On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio. 83:195–207. doi: 10.1007/BF00031692
   Google Scholar
• Lambeck R. 1997. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol. 11:849–856. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen C, Ponce M, Scataglini A. 2014. Revisión de las especies de Hymenophyllum (Hymenophyllaceae) del sur de Argentina y Chile. Gayana Bot. 70:274–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur R, Wilson E. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran A, Handerson P. 2003. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature. 422:714–716. doi: 10.1038/nature01547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marticorena A, Alarcón D, Abello L, Atala C. 2010. Plantas trepadoras, epifitas y parásitas nativas de Chile: Guía de Campo. Concepción: Ediciones Corporación Chilena de la Madera.
   Google Scholar
• Marticorena C, Rodríguez R. 1995. Flora de Chile. Vol I Pteridophyta-Gymnospermae. Concepción: Universidad de Concepción.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez O. 1985. Plantas trepadoras del bosque chileno. Valdivia: Editorial Alborada.
   Google Scholar
• Möller P, Muñoz-Pedreros A. 2014. Legal protection assessment of different inland wetlands in Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 87:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40693-014-0023-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondragón D. 2011. Guidelines for collecting demographic data for population dynamics studies on vascular epiphytes. J Torrey Bot Soc. 138:327–335. doi: 10.3159/TORREY-D-11-00025.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz A, Chacon P, Perez F, Barnert E, Armesto J. 2003. Diversity and host tree preferences of vascular epiphytes and vines in a temperate rainforest in southern Chile. Aust J Bot. 51:381–391. doi: 10.1071/BT02070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 10:58–62. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara R. 2005. Species richness estimators: how many species can dance on the head of a pin? J Anim Ecol. 74:375–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00940.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra M, Acuña K, Corcuera L, Saldaña A. 2009. Vertical distribution of Hymenophyllaceae species among host tree microhabitats in a temperate rain forest in Southern Chile. J Veg Sci. 20:588–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Cortés F, Escalona-Ulloa M, Rebolledo G, Pincheira-Ulbrich J, Torres Álvarez O. 2009. Efecto de los cambios globales sobre la salud humana y la seguridad alimentaria. Buenos Aires: Published by RED CYTED 406RT0285. Efecto del cambio en el uso del suelo en la economía local: Una perspectiva histórica en el borde costero de La Araucanía, Sur de Chile; p. 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Cortés F, Limpert C, Andrade E, Hauenstein E, Tapia J, Bertrán C, Vargas-Chacoff L. 2014. Dinámica geomorfológica de la costa de La Araucanía. Rev Geogr Norte GD. 58:241–260. doi: 10.4067/S0718-34022014000200013
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Cortés F, Pincheira-Ulbrich J, Bertrán C, Tapia J, Hauenstein E, Fernández E, Rozas D. 2011. A study of the geographic distribution of swamp forest in the coastal zone of the Araucanía Region, Chile. Appl Geogr. 31:545–555. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincheira-Ulbrich J. 2011. Patrones de diversidad de plantas trepadoras y epifitas vasculares en el bosque lluvioso valdiviano de Sudamérica: Una síntesis entre los años 2000 y 2010. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 80:9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pincheira-Ulbrich J, Rau JR, Smith-Ramirez C. 2012. Diversidad de plantas trepadoras y epifitas vasculares en un paisaje agroforestal del sur de Chile: una comparación entre fragmentos de bosque nativo. B Soc Argent Bot. 47:411–426.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez C, Ferriere A, Figueroa H. 1983. Estudio fitosociológico de los bosques pantanosos templados del sur de Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 56:11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez C, San Martín C, San Martín J. 1996. Ecología de los Bosques nativos de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria. Estructura florística de los bosques pantanosos de Chile sur-central; p. 215–234.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes F, Zanetti S, Espinosa A, Alvear M. 2010. Biochemical properties in vascular epiphytes substrate from a temperate forest of Chile. Rev Cienc Suelo Nutr Vegetal. 10:126–138.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Huntiel A, Bustamante R, Marin V, Medel R. 2012. Effects of sampling completeness on the structure of plant-pollinator networks. Ecology. 93:1593–1603. doi: 10.1890/11-1803.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez R, Alarcón D, Espejo J. 2009. Helechos nativos del centro y sur de Chile: Guía de campo. Concepción: Editorial Corporación Chilena de la Madera.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña A, Parra M, Flores-Bavestrello A, Corcuera L, Bravo L. 2014. Effects of forest successional status on microenvironmental conditions, diversity, and distribution of filmy fern species in a temperate rainforest. Plant Spec Biol. 29:253–262. doi: 10.1111/1442-1984.12020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Martín J, Espinosa A, Zanetti S, Hauenstein E, Ojeda N, Arraigada C. 2008. Composición y estructura de la vegetación epifita vascular en un bosque primario de Olivillo (Aextoxicom punctatum R. et P.) en el sur de Chile. Ecología Austral. 18:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• San Martín J, Troncoso A, Ramírez C. 1988. Estudio fitosociológico de los bosques pantanosos nativos de la Cordillera de la Costa en Chile central. Bosque. 9:17–33. doi: 10.4206/bosque.1988.v9n1-03
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzer S, Bongers F. 2002. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:223–230. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02491-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzer S, Bongers F, Burham R, Putz F. 2015. Ecology of lianas. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shen T, Chao A, Lin C. 2003. Predicting the number of new species in further taxonomic sampling. Ecology. 84:798–804. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0798:PTNONS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Ramírez C, Pliscoff P, Teillier S, Barrera E. 2005. Historia, biodiversidad y ecología de los bosques costeros de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria. Patrones de riqueza y distribución de la flora vascular en la Cordillera de la Costa de Valdivia Osorno, y Llanquihue; p. 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Squeo F, Estades C, Bahamonde N, Cavieres L, Rojas G, Benoit I, Parada E, Fuentes A, Avilés R, Palma A, et al. 2010. Revisión de la clasificación de especies en categorías de amenaza en Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 83:511–529. doi: 10.4067/S0716-078X2010000400006
   Google Scholar
• Swenson N, Enquist B, Pither J, Kerkhoff A, Boyle B, Weiser M, Elser J, Fagan W, Forero-Montaña J, Fyllas N, et al. 2012. The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 21:798–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00727.x
   Google Scholar
• Thompson G, Whitters P. 2003. Effect of species richness and relative abundance on the shape of the species accumulation curve. Austral Ecol. 28:355–360. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UICN. 2001. Categorías y Criterios de la Lista Roja de la UICN: Versión 3.1. Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies de la UICN. Gland, Suiza and Cambridge, Reino Unido. [cited 2016 July 24]. Available from: http://www.sinia.cl/1292/articles-35077_pdf_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallington T, Moore S. 2005. Ecology, value and objectivity: advancing the debate. Bioscience. 55:873–878. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0873:EVAOAT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woda C, Huber A, Dohrenbusch A. 2006. Vegetación epífita y captación de neblina en bosques siempreverdes en la Cordillera Pelada, sur de Chile. Bosque. 27:231–240. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002006000300002
   Google Scholar
• Wolf J, Gradstein S, Nadkarni N. 2009. A protocol for sampling vascular epiphyte richness and abundance. J Trop Ecol. 25:107–121. doi: 10.1017/S0266467408005786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotz G, Bader M. 2009. Progress in Botany 70. Berlin: Springer. Chapter 7, Epiphytic plants in a changing world-global: change effects on vascular and non-vascular epiphytes; p. 147–170.
   Google Scholar