Taxonomic realignment of Senecio glaucophyllus (Asteraceae; Senecioneae) necessitates a new name for a widespread New Zealand species

References

• Ali SI. 1964. Senecio lautus complex in Australia. I. Taxonomic considerations and discussion of some of the related taxa from New Zealand. Australian Journal of Botany. 12:282–291.
   Google Scholar
• Beuzenberg EJ. 1975. Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora 17. Senecio (Compositae). New Zealand Journal of Botany. 13:345–353.
   Google Scholar
• Beuzenberg EJ, Groves BE. 1974. Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora 16. Miscellaneous families. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 12:211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning. 45:5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitwieser I, Brownsey PJ, Nelson WA, Wilton AD, editors. 2010. Flora of New Zealand online. [accessed 2020 July 24]. http://www.nzflora.info.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman TF. 1896. On some additions to the New Zealand flora. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute. 28:534–537.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman TF. 1906. Manual of the New Zealand flora. Wellington: Mackay, Govt. Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Connor HE, Edgar E. 1987. Name changes in the indigenous New Zealand flora, 1960–1986 and nomina nova 4, 1983–1986. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 25:115–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. Jmodeltest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods. 9:772–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange PJ, Liew CS, Rolfe JR, Pelser PB. 2015. Senecio esperensis (Asteraceae: Senecioneae) – a new combination for the L’Esperance Rock groundsel, Kermadec Islands. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 53:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange PJ, Norton DA, Courtney SP, Heenan PB, Barkla JW, Cameron EK, Hitchmough R, Townsend AJ. 2009. Threatened and uncommon plants of New Zealand (2008 revision). New Zealand Journal of Botany. 47:61–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange PJ, Rolfe JR, Barkla JW, Courtney SP, Champion PD, Perrie LR, Beadel SM, Ford KA, Breitwieser I, Schönberger I, et al. 2018. Conservation status of New Zealand indigenous vascular plants, 2017. Wellington: Department of Conservation: New Zealand threat classification series 22.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange PJ, Rolfe JR, Champion PD, Courtney SP, Heenan PB, Barkla JW, Cameron EK, Norton DA, Hitchmough RA. 2013. Conservation status of New Zealand indigenous vascular plants, 2012. Wellington: Department of Conservation: New Zealand threat classification series 3.
   Google Scholar
• Frampton CM, Ward JM. 1990. The use of ratio variables in systematics. Taxon. 39:586–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower JC. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics. 27:857–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Systematic Biology. 52:696–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heenan PB, Rogers GM. 2019. Conserving the plants of eastern South Island limestone. Ngā tipu ō te pākeho. Christchurch: Canterbury Botanical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick JF, Cameron EK. 1994. Annotated checklist of type specimens of New Zealand plants in the Auckland Institute and Museum Herbarium (AK). Part 5. dicotyledons. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum. 31:89–173.
   Google Scholar
• Hooker JD. 1852. Flora Novae-zelandiae part 1. London: Reeves.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A. 2005. Party: a laboratory for recursive part(y)itioning. R package version 0.2-8.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence ME. 1980. Senecio L. (Asteraceae) in Australia: chromosome numbers and the occurrence of polyploidy. Australian Journal of Botany. 28:151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence ME. 1985. Senecio L. (Asteraceae) in Australia: nuclear DNA amounts. Australian Journal of Botany. 33:221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis P. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology. 50:913–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and regression by Random Forest. R News. 2:18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Liew C-S, Memory AE, Ortiz-Barrientos D, de Lange PJ, Pelser PB. 2018. The delimitation and evolutionary history of the Australasian Lautusoid group of Senecio (Asteraceae; Senecioneae). Taxon. 67:130–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K. 2015. Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.4.
   Google Scholar
• Meudt HM, Prebble JM, Stanley RJ, Thorsen MJ. 2013. Morphological and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data show that New Zealand endemic Myosotis petiolata (Boraginaceae) comprises three rare and threatened species. Australian Systematic Botany. 26:210–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat CE, Ensing DJ, Gaskin JF, De Clerck-Floate RA, Pither J. 2015. Morphology delimits more species than molecular genetic clusters of invasive Pilosella. American Journal of Botany. 102:1145–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornduff R. 1960. An interpretation of the Senecio lautus complex in New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 88:63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Pelser PB, Gravendeel B, Van der Meijden R. 2002. Tackling speciose genera: species composition and phylogenetic position of Senecio sect. Jacobaea (Asteraceae) based on plastid and nrDNA sequences. American Journal of Botany. 89:929–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelser PB, Nordenstam B, Kadereit JW, Watson LE. 2007. An ITS phylogeny of tribe Senecioneae (Asteraceae) and a new delimitation of Senecio L. Taxon. 56:1077–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2019 May 27]. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers GM, Courtney SP, Heenan PB. 2018. The calcicolous vascular flora of New Zealand. Life forms, taxonomy, biogeography and conservation status. Science for conservation 331. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. Mrbayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 61:539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. 2015. RStudio: integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio Inc. [accessed 2019 May 27]. http://www.rstudio.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Shipunov A, Kosenko Y, Volkova P. 2011. Floral polymorphism in common primrose (Primula vulgaris Huds., Primulaceae) of the northeastern Black Sea coast. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 296:167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology. 49:369–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoracka A, Kuczyński L, Rector B, Amrine JW. 2014. Wheat curl mite and dry bulb mite: untangling a taxonomic conundrum through a multidisciplinary approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 111:421–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Kneib T, Augustin T, Zeileis A. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics. 9: Article no. 307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Zeileis A, Hothorn T. 2007. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics. 8: Article no. 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods. 14:323–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson IR. 2004. Taxonomic studies of Australian Senecio (Asteraceae): 1. the disciform species. Muelleria. 19:101–214.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend AJ, de Lange PJ, Norton DA, Molloy J, Miskelly C, Duffy C. 2008. The New Zealand threat classification system manual. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Webb CJ, Sykes WR, Garnock-Jones PJ. 1988. Flora of New Zealand, Volume IV, Naturalised Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms, Dicotyledons. Christchurch: Botany Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.
   Google Scholar