Genetic improvement of New Zealand aquaculture species: programmes, progress and prospects

References

• Amer P, Jopson N, Dodds K, Symonds J, Hills J 2001. Optimal utilization of genetic resources in aquaculture. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 61: 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Amer PR, Symonds JE 2000. Practical application of an inbreeding control algorithm for salmon. In: Benzie JAH ed. Genetics in aquaculture VII: proceedings of the seventh International Symposium on Genetics in Aquaculture, held in Townsville, Qld, 15–22 July 2000. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Abstracts, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey J 2011. New Zealand king salmon applied breeding. Proceedings of the Centre for Reproduction and Genomics Aquaculture Workshop, 10 June 2011. Invermay, New Zealand, AgResearch. Pp. 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley D, Rana K, Immink A 2001. The use of inter-specific hybrids in aquaculture and fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10: 325–337. 10.1023/A:1016691725361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JG, Pratoomyot J, Strachan F, Henderson RJ, Fontanillas R, Hebard A et al. 2010. Growth, flesh adiposity and fatty acid composition of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) families with contrasting flesh adiposity: effects of replacement of dietary fish oil with vegetable oils. Aquaculture 306: 225–232. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg P, Nielsen J, Sørensen MK 2006. EVA: Realized and predicted optimal genetic contributions. CD communication 27–09, 2 pp. WCGALP, 2006, s.246.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho A, Abella T, Tayamen M 2001. Fish genetics research and development in the Philippines. In: Gupta MV AB ed. Genetics in aquaculture: ICLARM Conference Proceedings 64. Penang, Malaysia, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management. Pp. 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Camara MD, Evans S, Langdon CJ 2008. Parental relatedness and survival of Pacific oysters from a naturalized population. Journal of Shellfish Research 27: 323–336. 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[323:PRASOP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Brauning R, Fisher PHB, Dodds K, Bailey J, Walker S et al. 2011. Proceedings of the Centre for Reproduction and Genomics Aquaculture Workshop, 10 June 2011. Invermay, New Zealand, AgResearch. Pp. 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK 2005. An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica 142: 169–196. 10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dégremont L, Bédier E, Boudry P 2010. Summer mortality of hatchery-produced Pacific oyster spat (Crassostrea gigas). II. Response to selection for survival and its influence on growth and yield. Aquaculture 299: 21–29. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin R, McNeil B, Groves T, Donaldson E 1991. Isolation of a Y-chromosomal DNA probe capable of determining genetic sex in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 1606–1612. 10.1139/f91-190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle RT, Herbinger C 1994. The use of DNA fingerprinting for high-intensity, within-family selection in fish breeding. Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Pp. 364–371.
   Google Scholar
• Du S, Devlin R, Hew C 1993. Genomic structure of growth hormone genes in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): presence of two functional genes, GH-I and GH-II, and a male-specific pseudogene, GH-psi. DNA Cell Biology 12: 739–751. 10.1089/dna.1993.12.739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES et al. 2011. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6: e19379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans F, Matson S, Brake J, Langdon C 2004. The effects of inbreeding on performance traits of adult Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Aquaculture 230: 89–98. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer DS 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York, Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer DS 1990. Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genetical Research 56: 57–70. 10.1017/S0016672300028883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjalestad KT 2005. Selection methods. In: Gjedrem T ed. Selection and breeding programs in aquaculture. Dordrecht, Springer. Pp. 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Fjalestad KT, Moen T, Gomez-Raya L. 2003. Prospects for genetic technology in salmon breeding programmes. Aquaculture Research 34: 397–406. 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2003.00823.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall G, Huang N 1988. Heritability and selection schemes for rainbow trout: body weight. Aquaculture International 73: 43–56. 10.1016/0044-8486(88)90040-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber A, Sullivan C 2006. Selective breeding for the hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops, Rafinesque x M. saxatilis, Walbaum) industry: status and perspectives. Aquaculture Research 37: 319–338. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01439.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjedrem T 2000. Genetic improvement of cold-water fish species. Aquaculture Research 31: 25–33. 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjedrem T 2005. Status and scope of aquaculture. In: Gjedrem T ed. Selection and breeding programs in aquaculture. Dordrecht, Springer. Pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gjedrem T 2010. The first family-based breeding program in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture 2: 2–15. 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerde B, Simianer H, Refstie T 1994. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for body weight, growth rate, and sexual maturity in Atlantic salmon. Livestock Production Science 38: 133–143. 10.1016/0301-6226(94)90057-4
   Google Scholar
• Gjøen H, Gjerde B 1998. Comparing breeding schemes using individual phenotypic values and BLUP breeding values as selection criteria. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP). Armidale, NSW, Australia, WCGALP. Pp. 111–114.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard ME 2009. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136: 245–257. 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris DL 1998. Livestock improvement: art, science, or industry? Journal of Animal Science 76: 2294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecock D, McGoldrick DJ, Bayne BL 1995. Hybrid vigor in Pacific oysters: an experimental approach using crosses among inbred lines. Aquaculture 137: 285–298. 10.1016/0044-8486(95)01105-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson CR, Quaas RL 1976. Multiple trait evaluation using relatives' records. Journal of Animal Science 43: 1188–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulata G 1995. A review of genetic improvement of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and other cyprinids by crossbreeding, hybridization and selection. Aquaculture International 129: 143–155. 10.1016/0044-8486(94)00244-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter G, Donaldson E, Stoss J, Baker I 1983. Production of monosex female groups of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) by the fertilization of normal ova with sperm from sex-reversed females. Aquaculture International 33: 355–364. 10.1016/0044-8486(83)90414-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King N, Janke A 2006. Oyster breeders look for quality and quantity. New Zealand Aquaculture 11: 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• King N, Janke A, Kaspar H, Foster S 2005. An intensive low volume larval rearing system for the simultaneous production of many families of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Larvi ‘05-Fish & Shellfish Larviculture Symposium. Oostende, Belgium, European Aquaculture Society. Pp. 236–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kinghorn B 2011. An algorithm for efficient constrained mate selection. Genetics Selection Evolution 43: 4. 10.1186/1297-9686-43-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn Y, Symonds J 2012. Evaluation of egg quality parameters as predictors of hatching success and early larval survival in hapuku (Polyprion oxygeneios). Aquaculture International 342–343: 42–47. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad K, Thorland I, Refstie T, Gjerde B 2006a. Body weight, sexual maturity, and spinal deformity in strains and families of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) at two years of age at different locations along the Norwegian coast. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63: 246–252. 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad K, Thorland ITR, Gjerde B 2006b. Genetic variation and genotype by location interaction in body weight, spinal deformity and sexual maturity in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) reared at different locations off Norway. Aquaculture International 259: 66–73. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane H 2013. Characterisation of the mitochondrial genome and the population genetics of Polyprion oxygeneios (hapuku) from around New Zealand. Unpublished thesis. Wellington, Victoria University.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon C, Evans F, Jacobson D, Blouin M 2003. Yields of cultured Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas Thunberg improved after one generation of selection. Aquaculture 220: 227–244. 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00621-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launey S, Hedgecock D 1999. Genetic load causes segregation distortion in oysters: mapping at 6 hours. International Conference on the Status of Plant and Animal Genome Research VII, San Diego, CA. Abstracts, p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Launey S, Hedgecock D 2001. High genetic load in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Genetics 159: 255–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurman GJ, Hilton Z, Ragg NLC 2013. Energetics of byssus attachment and feeding in the green-lipped mussel Perna canaliculus. The Biological Bulletin 224: 79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch M, Walsh B 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates Inc. Pp. xiii + 980 p.
   Google Scholar
• Marine Harvest 2012. The Marine Harvest salmon industry handbook. Bergen, Norway, Marine Harvest. 72 p.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall R 1994. The origins of New Zealand's Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Marine Fisheries Review 56: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen T, Luo Z 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 24: 305–313. 10.1186/1297-9686-24-4-305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuwissen TH 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75: 934–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais S, Silva T, Cordeiro O, Rodrigues P, Guy DR, Bron JE et al. 2012. Effects of genotype and dietary fish oil replacement with vegetable oil on the intestinal transcriptome and proteome of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BMC Genomics 13: 448. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss G 1998. Effect of temperature on the breeding cycle and spawning success of the New Zealand abalone, Haliotis australis. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 32: 139–146. 10.1080/00288330.1998.9516813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen N, Ponzoni R, Hamzah A, Yee H, Abu-Bakar K, Khaw H 2010. Genetics of flesh quality in fish. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP). Leipzig, Germany, WCGALP.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TTT, Hayes BJ, Ingram BA 2014. Genetic parameters and response to selection in blue mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) using a SNP-based pedigree. Aquaculture 420–421: 295–301. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho E, Ferrell DJ, Smith P, Taniguchi N 2001. Genetic divergence of kingfish from Japan, Australia and New Zealand inferred by microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA control region markers. Fisheries Science 67: 843–850. 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2001.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odegard J, Baranski M, Gjerde B, Gjedrem T 2011. Methodology for genetic evaluation of disease resistance in aquaculture species: challenges and future prospects. Aquaculture Research 42: 103–114. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragg NLC, King N, Watts E, Morrish J 2010. Optimising the delivery of the key dietary diatom Chaetoceros calcitrans to intensively cultured Greenshell™ mussel larvae, Perna canaliculus. Aquaculture 306: 270–280. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts R 2011. Abalone (paua) selective breeding: a commercial perspective. Proceedings of the Centre for Reproduction and Genomics Aquaculture Workshop, 10 June 2011. Invermay, New Zealand, AgResearch. Pp. 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P 2008. Population biology and genetics of paua, hapuku and kingfish: sourcing fish for broodstock development. Technical Report 132. 44 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sonesson AK, Gjerde B, Meuwissen THE 2005. Truncation selection for BLUP-EBV and phenotypic values in fish breeding schemes. Aquaculture 243: 61–68. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonesson AK, Gjerde B, Robinson N 2011. A simple selection scheme to improve disease resistance and growth. Aquaculture 319: 337–341. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds J, Heath P 2008. Getting picky with paua: selective breeding to improve productivity. Water & Atmosphere 16: 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds J, Walker S, Amer P, Dodds K 2000. Selective breeding for improved performance of farmed New Zealand Chinook salmon. In: Benzie JAH ed. Genetics in aquaculture VII: proceedings of the seventh International Symposium on Genetics in Aquaculture, held in Townsville, Qld, 15–22 July 2000. Amsterdam: Elsevier. P. 115.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds J, Walker S, van de Ven I, Marchant A, Irvine G, Pether S et al. 2012a. Developing broodstock resources for farmed marine fish. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 72: 222–226.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds J, Moss G, Jopson N, Roberts R, Birss J, Heath P et al. 2012b. Family-based selective breeding of New Zealand abalone, Haliotis iris: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 72: 216–221.
   Google Scholar
• Tacon A, Metian M 2008. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: trends and future prospects. Aquaculture International 285: 146–158. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin M, Rowe D, Poortenaar C, Boustead N 2005. Suppression of maturation in 2-year-old Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) reared under continuous photoperiod. Aquaculture International 246: 239–250. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker SP, Ingram M, Bailey J, Dodds KG, Fisher PJ, Amer PR et al. 2012. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) feed conversion efficiency: evaluation and potential for selection. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 72: 227–230.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J 2002. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160: 1203–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatmore P, Nguyen NH, Miller A, Lamont R, Powell D, D'Antignana T et al. 2013. Genetic parameters for economically important traits in yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi. Aquaculture 400–401: 77–84. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will M, Hale M, Schiel D, Gemmell N 2011. Low to moderate levels of genetic differentiation detected across the distribution of the New Zealand abalone, Haliotis iris. Marine Biology 158: 1417–1429. 10.1007/s00227-011-1659-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar