Relationships between Maori values and streamflow: tools for incorporating cultural values into freshwater management decisions

References

• Arthington AH, Kennen JG, Stein ED, Webb JA. 2018. Recent advances in environmental flows science and water management—innovation in the Anthropocene. Freshwater Biology. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber M, Jackson S. 2012. Indigenous water management in the upper Roper River, Northern Territory: history and implications for contemporary water planning. Darwin: CSIRO; 110 p.
   Google Scholar
• BECA. 2008. Draft guidelines for the selection of methods to determine ecological flows and water levels. Report prepared by BECA Infrastructure Ltd for Ministry for the Environment. 159 p.
   Google Scholar
• Booker DJ. 2010. Predicting wetted width in any river at any discharge. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 35:828–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booker DJ. 2016a. Generalized models of riverine fish hydraulic habitat. Journal of Ecohydraulics. 1:31–49. doi: 10.1080/24705357.2016.1229141
   Google Scholar
• Booker DJ. 2016b. National water allocation statistics for environmental reporting. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research client report 2017065CH, 21 p.
   Google Scholar
• Booker DJ, Snelder TH, Greenwood MJ, Crow SK. 2015. Relationships between invertebrate communities and both hydrological regime and other environmental factors across New Zealand’s rivers. Ecohydrology. 8:13–32. doi: 10.1002/eco.1481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovee KD, Lamb BL, Bartholow JM, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J, Henriksen J. 1998. Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD-1998-0004. 139 p.
   Google Scholar
• Burmil S, Daniel T, Hetherington J. 1999. Human values and perceptions of water in arid landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 44:99–109. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapcott JE, Collier KJ, Death RG, Goodwin EO, Harding JS, Kelly D, Leathwick JR, Young RG. 2012. Quantifying relationships between land-use gradients and structural and functional indicators of stream ecological integrity. Freshwater Biology. 57:74–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran F, Brunsell N, Cabalzar A, van der Veld P, Azevedo E, Azevedo F, Pedrosa R, Winegar L. 2016. Indigenous ecological calendars define scales for climate change and sustainability assessments. Sustainability Science. 11:69–89. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0303-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig D. 2006. Indigenous property rights to water: environmental flows, cultural values and tradeable property rights. In: Smajgl A, Larson S, editors. Adapting rules for sustainable resource use. Townsville: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems; p. 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Crow SK, Booker DJ, Snelder TH. 2013. Contrasting influence of flow regime on freshwater fishes displaying diadromous and nondiadromous life histories. Ecology of Freshwater Fish. 22:82–94. doi: 10.1111/eff.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sawy O, Pauchant T. 1988. Triggers, templates, and twitches in the tracking of emerging strategic issues. Strategic Management Journal. 9:455–473. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250090506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn M, Jackson S. 2011. Protecting indigenous values in water management: a challenge to conventional environmental flow assessments. Ecosystems. 14:1232–1248. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9476-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckman PD. 2017. New Zealands fresh waters: values, state, trends and human impacts. Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, 120 p. http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/PMCSA-Freshwater-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall A. 2003. Ashburton/Hakatere river, lakes and tributaries – Tangata Whenua values. Report prepared for Environment Canterbury. September 2001. 31p.
   Google Scholar
• Gray SA, Gray S, De Kok JL, Helfgott AER, O’Dwyer B, Jordan R, Nyaki A. 2015. Using fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory approach to analyze change, preferred states, and perceived resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society. 20:11. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07396-200211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray SA, Zanre E, Gray SRJ. 2014. Fuzzy cognitive maps as representations of mental models and group beliefs. In Papageorgiou E editor. Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 54. Berlin: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39739-4_2.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood MJ, Booker DJ. 2015. The influence of antecedent floods on aquatic invertebrate diversity, abundance and community composition. Ecohydrology. 8:188–203. doi: 10.1002/eco.1499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmsworth GR, Young RG, Walker D, Clapcott JE, James T. 2011. Linkages between cultural and scientific indicators of river and stream health. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 45:423–436. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2011.570767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson S. 2017. How much water does a culture need? Environmental water management’s cultural challenge and indigenous responses. In: Horne A, Webb A, Stewardson M, Richter B, Acreman M, editors. Water for the environment. Cambridge (MA): Elsevier; p. 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Finn M, Featherston P. 2009. Aquatic resource use by indigenous Australians in two tropical river catchments: the Fitzroy River and Daly River. Human Ecology. 37:893–908. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9518.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett IG, Biggs BJF. 2009. Application of the ‘natural flow paradigm’ in a New Zealand context. River Research and Applications. 25:1126–1135. doi: 10.1002/rra.1208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JM, Tharme RE, de Villiers MS. 2008. Development of the Building Block Methodology for instream flow assessments, and supporting research on the effects of different magnitude flows on riverine ecosystems. Water Research Commission Report No. 576/1/98. 452 p.
   Google Scholar
• Langton M. 2006. Earth, wind, fire and water: the social and spiritual construction of water in Aboriginal societies. In: David B, Barker B, McNiven I, editors. The social archaeology of Australian indigenous landscapes. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press; p. 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer KS. 2007. Human Well-being values of environmental flows enhancing social equity in integrated water resources management. Delft Hydraulics Select Series (Book 10), 208 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. 2014. National policy statement for freshwater management 2014, 34 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nania J, Guarino J. 2014. Restoring sacred waters, a guide to protecting tribal non-consumptive water uses in the Colorado River basin. Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Boulder (CO): Environment IOS Press. 114 p.
   Google Scholar
• Piñeiro G, Perelman S, Guerschman J, Paruelo J. 2008. How to evaluate models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecological Modelling. 216:316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman Mc., Henriksen J, et al. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology. 55:147–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Koster B, Bunn SE, Mackay SJ, Poff NL, Naiman RJ, Lake PS. 2010. The use of Bayesian networks to guide investments in flow and catchment restoration for impaired river ecosystems. Freshwater Biology. 55:243–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharme RE. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications. 16:1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tipa G. 1999. Taieri River case study, Ministry for the Environment Technical Paper No 58, Environmental performance indicators: Māori Indicators Case Study.
   Google Scholar
• Tipa and Associates. 2013. Cultural values, flow and water management issues for the Waikirikiri/Selwyn-Te Waihora catchments. Data collected by the Taumutu/Tuahuriri COMAR Team and Horomaka COMAR Team. Report prepared by Tipa and Associates for Environment Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch, New Zealand. 134 p. [online]. http://files.ecan.govt.nz/public/lwrp/variation1/cultural-values-flow-water-managementissues-waikirikiri-selwyn-te-waihora-catchments.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tipa G, Nelson K. 2008. Introducing cultural opportunities: a framework for incorporating cultural perspectives in contemporary resource management. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 10:313–337. doi: 10.1080/15239080802529472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipa G, Nelson K. 2012. Identifying cultural flow preferences: The Kakaunui River case study where Manawhenua identified their flow preferences. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 138:660–670. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipa G, Nelson K. 2013. Bringing the past into our future—using historic data to inform contemporary freshwater management. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences. 8:40–63. http://doi.org/10.1080/1177083x.2013.837080.
   Google Scholar
• Tipa G, Severne C. 2010. Including Mātauranga Māori in environmental flow setting decisions National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Client Report: HAM2010-030, 26 p.
   Google Scholar
• Tipa G, Teirney L. 2003. A cultural health index for steams and waterways: indicators for recognising and expressing cultural values. Ministry for Environment Technical Paper 75. ME number 475, 58 p.
   Google Scholar
• Tipa G, Teirney L. 2006. Using the cultural health index: how the assess the health of streams and waterways. Ministry for Environment Reference ME711, 62 p.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2003. 1st United Nations World Water Development Report, 36 p.
   Google Scholar
• Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy Liermann C, et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature. 467:555–561. doi: 10.1038/nature09440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wantzen KM, Ballouche A, Longuet I, Bao I, Bocoum H, Cisse L, Chauhan M, Girard P, Gopal B, Kane A, et al. 2016. River culture: an eco-social approach to mitigate the biological and cultural diversity crisis in riverscapes. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology. 16:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick K. 1979. Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour. 1:41–74.
   Google Scholar
• Weick K. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 321 p.
   Google Scholar