Cluster analysis reveals latent structure in stakeholder interests relevant to the management of Blueskin Bay estuary, Otago, Aotearoa New Zealand

References

• Australian Government. 2018. Charter: national water quality management strategy. Canberra: Department of Agriculture and Water Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs. 81(2):169–193. doi:10.1890/10-1510.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa A, Martin B, Hermoso V, Arevalo-Torres J, Barbiere J, Martinez-Lopez J, Martín B, Arévalo-Torres J, Barbière J, Martínez-López J, et al. 2019. Cost-effective restoration and conservation planning in green and blue infrastructure designs: a case study on the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean: Andalusia (Spain) – Morocco. Science of the Total Environment. 652:1463–1473. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudoin L, Gittins JR. 2021. The ecological outcomes of collaborative governance in large river basins: who is in the room and does it matter? Journal of Environmental Management. 281:111836. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle JC. 2017. Improving the effectiveness of collaborative governance regimes: lessons from watershed partnerships. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 143(9). doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle JC, Koontz TM. 2014. Goal specificity: a proxy measure for improvements in environmental outcomes in collaborative governance. Journal of Environmental Management. 145:268–276. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgman M, Carr A, Godden L, Gregory R, McBride M, Flander L, Maguire L. 2011. Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment. Conservation Letters. 4(2):81–87. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00165.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr G, Bloschl G, Loucks DP. 2012. Evaluating participation in water resource management: a review. Water Resources Research. 48. doi:10.1029/2011wr011662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, Niknafs A. 2015. Determining the best number of clusters in a data set. R Package ‘NbClust’ Version 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions. 26:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash M, Liu H, Scheuermann P, Tan KL. 2003. Fast hierarchical clustering and its validation. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 44(1):109–138. doi:10.1016/s0169-023x(02)00138-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano L. 2010. Facing the water framework directive challenges: a baseline of stakeholder participation in the European Union. Journal of Environmental Management. 91(6):1332–1340. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougill AJ, Fraser EDG, Holden J, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS, Stagl S. Stringer LC. 2006. Learning from doing participatory rural research: lessons from the Peak District National Park. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 57(2):259–275. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00051.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas EJ, Lohrer AM, Pilditch CA. 2019. Biodiversity breakpoints along stress gradients in estuaries and associated shifts in ecosystem interactions. Scientific Reports. 9. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54192-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duram LA, Brown KG. 1999. Assessing public participation in US watershed planning initiatives. Society & Natural Resources. 12(5):455–467. doi:10.1080/089419299279533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham E, Baker H, Smith M, Moore E, Morgan V. 2014. The BiodivERsA stakeholder engagement handbook. Paris: BiodivERsA.
   Google Scholar
• East Otago Taiapure. 2008. East Otago Taipure management plan. Karitane: East Otago Taiäpure.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T, editors. 2010. Rational decision making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez RA, Walshe T, Burgman MA. 2013. Capturing social impacts for decision-making: a multicriteria decision analysis perspective. Diversity and Distributions. 19(5–6):608–616. doi:10.1111/ddi.12058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities. L 327:1–71.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 8 on Public Participation in Relation to the Water Framework Directive. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Falkenmark M. 2003. Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 358(1440):2037–2049. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler FJ, Mangione TW. 1990. Standardized survey interviewing: minimizing interviewer-related error. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gray S, Chan A, Clark D, Jordan R. 2012. Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social-ecological decision-making: benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecological Modelling. 229:88–96. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlseon D. 2012. Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory RS, Keeney RL. 2002. Making smarter environmental management decisions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 38(6):1601–1612. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04367.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Lovett S, Lienert J, Sredlak D. 2019. A mixed-methods approach to strategic planning for multi-benefit regional water infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management. 233:218–237. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Innes JE, Booher DE. 2018. Planning with complexity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin RA, Stansbury J. 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review. 64(1):55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker B, Buchecker M, Mueller-Boeker U. 2007. Objectives of public participation: which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Water Resources Research. 43:10. doi:10.1029/2006wr005584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keneley M, O'Toole K, Coffey B, MacGarvey A. 2013. Stakeholder participation in estuary management: the development of Victoria’s estuary entrance management support system. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 20(1):49–62. doi:10.1080/14486563.2012.756379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennish MJ. 2002. Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environmental Conservation. 29(1):78–107. doi:10.1017/s0376892902000061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesenheimer JS, Greitemeyer T. 2021. A “lockdown” of materialism values and pro-environmental behavior: short-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability. 13:21. doi:10.3390/su132111774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky DM, Beirele TC. 2001. Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making: examples from the Great Lakes region. Society & Natural Resources. 14(9):815–826. doi:10.1080/089419201753210620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz TM, Johnson EM. 2004. One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences. 37(2):185–204. doi:10.1023/b:olic.0000048532.94150.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerlen M, Reichert P, Siber R, Schuwirth N. 2019. Ecological assessment of river networks: from reach to catchment. Science of the Total Environment. 650:1613–1627. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhans SD, Jähnig SC, Schallenberg M. 2019. On the use of multicriteria decision analysis to formally integrate community values into ecosystem-based freshwater management. River Research and Applications. 35:1666–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhans SD, Lienert J. 2016. Four common simplifications of multi-criteria decision analysis do not hold for river rehabilitation. PLoS One. 11(3):e0150695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhans SD, Lienert J, Schuwirth N, Reichert P. 2013. How to make river assessments comparable: a demonstration for hydromorphology. Ecological Indicators. 32:264–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhans SD, Schallenberg M. 2022. Accounting for diverse cultural values in freshwater management plans by using a transparent and collaborative decision support system based on multi-criteria decision analysis. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. doi:10.1080/00288330.2021.1987932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhans SD, Schuwirth N, Reichert P. 2014. The method matters: guide to indicator aggregation in ecological assessments. Ecological Indicators. 45:494–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienert J, Koller M, Konrad J, McArdell CS, Schuwirth N. 2011. Multiple-criteria decision analysis reveals high stakeholder preference to remove pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology. 45(9):3848–3857. doi:10.1021/es1031294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, Kidwell SM, Kirby MX, Peterson CH, Jackson JBC. 2006. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science. 312(5781):1806–1809. doi:10.1126/science.1128035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyet V. 2005. A framework for the participative process in a large environmental project. Case study: the 3rd Rhone river correction [PhD thesis]. Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Luyet V, Schlaepfer R, Parlange MB, Buttler A. 2012. A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management. 111:213–219. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K, Studer M, Roudier P. 2016. Finding groups in data: Cluster analysis extended Rousseeuw et al. R package ‘cluster’ version 2.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen M, Weber C, Aberg U, Lienert J. 2019. Identifying relevant objectives in environmental management decisions: An application to a national monitoring program for river restoration. Ecological Indicators. 101:851–866. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon PA, Kirk N. 2012. Role of indigenous Maori people in collaborative water governance in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 55(7):941–959. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.634577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison K. 2003. Stakeholder involvement in water management: necessity or luxury? Water Science and Technology. 47(6):43–51. doi:10.2166/wst.2003.0354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh F, Legendre P. 2014. Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification. 31(3):274–295. doi:10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Department of Conservation. 2010. New Zealand coastal policy statement. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Department of Conservation. 2016. CMS - conservation management strategy. Otago 2016, Volume 1. Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. 2020. National policy statement for freshwater management 2020 (August 2020). Wellington: New Zealand Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. 2020. Managing our estuaries. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen S. 2014. Who’s in and who’s out? inclusion and exclusion in Canterbury’s freshwater governance. New Zealand Geographer. 70(1):33–46. doi:10.1111/nzg.12038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otago Regional Council. 2012. Regional plan: Coast for Otago. Dunedin: Otago Regional Council.
   Google Scholar
• Paillex A, Schuwirth N, Lorenz AW, Januschke K, Peter A, Reichert P. 2017. Integrating and extending ecological river assessment: concept and test with two restoration projects. Ecological Indicators. 72:131–141. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe S, Proctor W, Wilcox C, Innes J, Rochester W, Dowling N. 2009. Stakeholder objective preferences in Australian Commonwealth managed fisheries. Marine Policy. 33(5):750–758. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MS. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation. 141(10):2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management. 90(5):1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert P, Langhans SD, Lienert J, Schuwirth N. 2015. The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support. Journal of Environmental Management. 154:316–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinner J, Newton M, Duncan R. 2015. Representation and legitimacy in collaborative freshwater planning: stakeholder perspectives on a Canterbury zone committee. Prepared for the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment, Contract CO9X1003. Cawthron Report No. 2787.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2020. Statistical area 1 dataset for 2018 Census.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling EJ, Betley E, Sigouin A, Gomez A, Toomey A, Cullman G, Malone C, Pekor A, Arengo F, Blair M, et al. 2017. Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation. 209:159–171. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symmank L, Profeta A, Niens C. 2021. Valuation of river restoration measures – Do residential preferences depend on leisure behaviour? European Planning Studies. 29(3):580–600. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1760792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadaki M, Sinner J, Stahlmann-Brown P, Greenhalgh S. 2020. Does collaborative governance increase public confidence in water management? survey evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand. Water Alternatives. 13(2):302–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States. 1972. Federal water pollution control act (Clean Water Act) 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. Sec. 101, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ward JH. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 58(301):236–223. doi:10.2307/2282967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler T, Tuler S. 2021. Four decades of public participation in risk decision making. Risk Analysis. 41(3):503–518. doi:10.1111/risa.13250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar