Hegemonic ideas and local adaptations: Development of the Norwegian regional restructuring instrument

References

• Aarset, B. & Jakobsen, S.-E. 2009. Political regulation and radical institutional change: The case of aquaculture in Norway. Marine Policy 33, 280–287. 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ålvik vekst Kvam KF. 2007. Strategiplan 2007–2011. Ålvik vekst Kvam, Kvam.
   Google Scholar
• Åmot kommune. 2000. Handlingsplan for omstillingsarbeidet i Åmot 5.10.2000. Åmot kommune, Åmot.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 1992. Post-Fordism: Models, fantasies and phantoms of transition. Amin, A. (ed.) Post-Fordism: A Reader, 1–40. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T. & Gertler, M. 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. & Nelson, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 291–317. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28, 31–56. 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. & Martin, R. (eds.) 2010. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S. 2011. The geography of knowledge flows. Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D. & Tödtling, F. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, 132–142. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijn, P. de & Lagendijk, A. 2005. Regional innovation systems in the Lisbon strategy. European Planning Studies 13, 1153–1172. 10.1080/09654310500336519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukve, O., Glosvik, Ø. & Teigen, H. 1995. Kommunalt tiltaksarbeid. Rapport 6/95. Vestlandsforskning, Sogndal.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 1985. Regional innovation policy: Problems and strategies in Britain and France. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 3, 253–267. 10.1068/c030253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2004. Regional innovation systems – an evolutionary approach. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. & Braczyk H.-J. (eds.) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, 1–18. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D. & Tödtling, F. (eds.) 2011. Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, B. 2002. An institutional approach to local restructuring: The case of four Norwegian mining towns. European Urban and Regional Studies 9, 5–20. 10.1177/096977640200900101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. 2011. Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. 6th ed. Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Drangsland, K.-A. & Jakobsen, S.-E. 2009. Kritiske suksessfaktorer for omstillingsarbeidet: Erfaringer fra gjennomførte omstillingsprogram. SNF rapport 01/09. Samfunns og næringslivsforskning, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 2005. Innovation: A guide to the literature. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. & Nelson, T.R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 1–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.L. & Bennett, A. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Grønlund, I.L. 1994. Restructuring one-company towns: The Norwegian context and the case of Mo i Rana. European Urban and Regional Studies 1, 161–185. 10.1177/096977649400100205
   Google Scholar
• Grønlund, I.L. 1996. Omstilling av ensidige industrikommuner: Eksemplet Mo i Rana. Working Paper No. 25/1996. Samfunns og næringslivsforskning, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Guvåg, B. 1990. Evaluering av omstillings- og utviklingsbevilgningen i noen utvalgte kommuner: Forutsetninger for og organisering av omstillingsprosessen i ensidige indsutrikommuner. Arbeidsrapport No. M 9004. Møreforskning, Molde.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J.C. 1977. The One Company Town in Norway: Can We Learn from the Recent Past in Planning for the Near Future? Meddelelser fra Geografisk institutt ved Norges handelshøyskole og Universitetet i Bergen, 39. Geografisk institutt, Norges handelshøyskole og Universitetet i Bergn, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J.C. & Selstad, T. 1999. Regional omstilling: Strukturbestemt eller styrbar? Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. 2010. Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. Boschma, R. & Martin, R. (eds.) The Handbook Of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 450–470. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. & Lagendijk, A. 2001. The dilemmas of interregional institutional learning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19, 65–84. 10.1068/c9943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høvig, Ø.S., Slinning, A.-E. & Jakobsen, S.-E. 2011. Sluttevaluering av omstillingsarbeidet i Ålvik vekst Kvam KF. Skriftserien nr. 5/2011. Høgskolen i Bergen, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Innovasjon Norge. 2006. Veiledningshefte i omstillings- og nyskapingsarbeid. Innovasjon Norge, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. & Remøe, S.O. 2001. New approaches to innovation policy: Some Norwegian examples. European Planning Studies 9, 285–302. 10.1080/713666481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E. 2004a. Evaluering som læring eller pliktøvelse? Aarbo, P. & Gammelsæter, H. (eds.) Innovasjonspolitikkens scenografi: Nye perspektiver på næringsutvikling, 185–203. Tapir Akademisk Forlag, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E. 2004b. Virker virkemidlene? Teori og praksis for omstillingsarbeidet. Lindkvist, K.B. (ed.) Ressurser og omstilling – et geografisk perspektiv på regional omstilling i Norge, 199–236. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E. 2007. Sluttevaluering av omstillingsprogrammet i Åmot. SNF rapport 16/07. Samfunns og næringslivsforskning, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E. & Onsager, K. 2008. Innovasjonspolitikk for regional næringsutvikling. Isaksen, A., Karlsen, A. & Sæther, B. (eds.) Innovasjoner i norske næringer: Et geografisk perspektiv, 269–288. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E., Alvheim, S., Kvitastein, O. & Hansen, J.C. 2001. Næringsutvikling, stedsutvikling og omstilling: Underveisevaluering av den statlig støttede omstillingsinnsatsen i Vaksdal, Bremanger, Odda, Dalane og Glåmdal. SNF rapport 40/01. Stiftelsen for samfunns og næringslivsforskning, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E., Byrkjeland, M., Båtevik, F.O., Pettersen, I.B., Skogseid, I. & Yttredal, E.R. 2012. Continuity and change in path-dependent regional policy development: The regional implementation of the Norwegian VRI programme. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 66, 133–143. 10.1080/00291951.2012.681686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. 2011. Regional cultural economy: Evolution and innovation. Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D. & Tödtling, F. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, 246–264. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1992. Post-Fordism and the state. Amin, A. (ed.) Post-Fordism: A Reader, 251–279. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1997. Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy 4, 561–581. 10.1080/096922997347751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, A. 2000. The obligation to heal when the market hurts – national regulation of the electricity sector and local industrial impacts. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 54, 12–21. 10.1080/002919500423546
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, A. & Lindeløv, B. 1998. Omstillingspolitikk i møte med praksis – et spørsmål om forankring. NF-rapport nr. 8/98. Nordlandsforskning, Bodø.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. 2011. Regional innovation policy between theory and practice. Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D. & Tödtling, F. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, 597–608. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Laranja, M., Uyarra, E. & Flanagan, K. 2008. Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in multi-level setting. Research Policy 37, 823–835. 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash, S. & Urry, J. 1987. The End of Organized Capitalism. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2010. Roepke lecture in economic geography – Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86, 1–27. 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6, 395–437. 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363. 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 1997. The learning region: Institutions, innovations and regional renewal. Regional Studies 35, 491–503. 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOU 1983: 10. Problemer og muligheter på ensidige industristeder. Industridepartementet, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Regional Development Policies in OECD Countries. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A. & Tomaney, J. 2006. Local and Regional Development. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Piore, M. & Sabel, C.F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. Basic Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1998. Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments and institutions. Porter, M. (ed.) On Competition, 197–287. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Remøe, S.O. 2005. Governing fragmentation: The case of Norway. Remøe, S.O. (ed.) Governance of Innovation Systems. Vol. 2. Case Studies in Innovation Policy, 217–244. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C.F. 1992. Flexible specialisation and the re-emergence of regional economies. Amin, A. (ed.) Post-Fordism: A Reader, 101–156. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sand, R., Steen, M., Carlsson, E. & Nilsen, S.K. 2010. Langtidseffekter av omstillingsprogrammer – en studie av nærings- og samfunnsmessige effekter i aktuelle kommuner 5–10 år etter programslutt. Rapport 2010:1. Trøndelag forskning og utvikling, Steinkjer.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G. & Ketels, C. 2003. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Bromma Tryck, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 25 (2004–2005). Om regionalpolitikken. Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Therborn, G. 1986. Why Some People are More Unemployed than Others. Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34, 1203–1219. 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. 2010. What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20, 115–137. 10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicken, O. 2009. The layers of national innovation systems: The historical evolution of a national innovation system in Norway. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. & Verspagen, B. (eds.) Innovation, Path Dependency, and Policy, 33–60. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, K.Y. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Sage, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar