The challenge of enhancing accessibility to recreational landscapes

References

• Arksey, H. & O'Malley, L. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Arnberger, A. 2006. Recreation use of urban forests: An inter-area comparison. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4, 135–144. 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Asakawa, S., Yoshida, K. & Yabe, K. 2004. Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning 68, 167–182. 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00158-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejleri, I., Steiner, R.L., Fischman, A. & Schmucker, J.M. 2011. Using GIS to analyze the role of barriers and facilitators to walking in children's travel to school. Urban Design International 16, 51–62. 10.1057/udi.2010.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, P.J.P. 2000. Contesting rural recreation: The battle over access to Windermere. Land Use Policy 17, 295–303. 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00030-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., Thompson, C.W. & Travlou, P. 2003. Contested views of freedom and control: Children, teenagers and urban fringe woodlands in Central Scotland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2, 87–100. 10.1078/1618-8667-00026
   Google Scholar
• Bjerke, T., Østdahl, T., Thrane, C. & Strumse, E. 2006. Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 5, 35–44. 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Blunden, J. & Curry, N. (eds.) 1985. The Changing Countryside. Croom Helm, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, C., Daniel, P. & Hopkinson, M. 1984. The Geography of Rural Resources. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. 2012. When green is white: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park. Geoforum 43, 595–611. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspersen, O.H. & Olafsson, A.S. 2010. Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of the green structure in greater Copenhagen. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9, 101–112. 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R.L. & Marston, J.R. 2003. Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis 35, 83–96. 10.1353/geo.2002.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloke, P. (ed.) 1987. Rural Planning: Policy into Action. Harper and Row, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P. & Park, C. 1985. Rural Resource Management. Croom Helm, Beckenham.
   Google Scholar
• Colson, V., Garcia, S., Rondeux, J. & Lejeune, P. 2010. Map and determinants of woodlands visiting in Wallonia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9, 83–91. 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, A., Brunsdon, C. & Green, E. 2008. Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning 86, 103–114. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. 1985. Prospect, perspective, and the evolution of the landscape idea. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10, 45–62. 10.2307/622249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmann, N., Wolch, J., Joassart-Marcelli, P., Reynolds, K. & Jerrett, M. 2010. The active city? Disparities in provision of urban public recreation resources. Health & Place 16, 431–445. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, E.M., De Wulf, R. & Van Herzele, A. 2007. Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility. Landscape and Urban Planning 80, 14–22. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direktoratet for naturforvaltning. 1994. Planlegging av grønnstruktur i byer og tettsteder. DN-håndbok 6. Direktoratet for naturforvaltning, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Dramstad, W.E., Fry, G., Fjellstad, W.J., Skar, B., Helliksen, W., Sollund, M.L.B., Tveit, M.S., Geelmuyden, A.K. & Framstad, E. 2001. Integrating landscape-based values – Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 57, 257–268. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00208-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmelin, L., Fredman, P., Lisberg Jensen, E. & Sandell, K. 2010. Planera för friluftsliv – natur, samhälle, upplevelser. Carlsson Bokförlag, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Figari, H., Haaland, H. & Krange, O. 2009. Friluftsliv som hverdagsliv: Innvandrerkvinners bruk av utendørsområder i Groruddalen. NINA-rapport 479. Norsk institutt for naturforskning, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Fridgen, J.D. 1984. Environmental psychology and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 11, 19–39. 10.1016/0160-7383(84)90094-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentin, S. 2011. Outdoor recreation and ethnicity in Europe—A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10, 153–161. 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K.T. & van Wee, B. 2004. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 12, 127–140. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Gilg, A. 1985. An Introduction to Rural Geography. Edward Arnold, London.
   Google Scholar
• Gobster, P.H. 1995. Perception and use of a metropolitan greenway system for recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning 33, 401–413. 10.1016/0169-2046(94)02031-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen, V.S. & Frivold, L.H. 2008. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7, 241–258. 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., Mang, M. & Evans, G.W. 1991. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23, 3–27. 10.1177/0013916591231001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillsdon, M., Panter, J., Foster, C. & Jones, A. 2006. The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health 120, 1127–1132. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højring, K. 2002. The right to roam the countryside—law and reality concerning public access to the landscape in Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 29–41. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00245-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörnsten, L. & Fredman, P. 2000. On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning 51, 1–10. 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00097-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, M., Peters, K., Buijs, A.E., Gentin, S., Kloek, M.E. & O'Brien, L. 2012. Towards access for all? Policy and research on access of ethnic minority groups to natural areas in four European countries. Forest Policy and Economics 19, 4–11. 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J.M., Pigram, J.J. & Leigh Snead, S., 2003. Access and accessibility. Jenkins, J.M. & Pigram, J.J. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Leisure and Outdoor Recreation, 1–4. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jim, C.Y. & Chen, W.Y. 2006. Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 75, 81–96. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, A. & Anthopoulou, A. 2007. Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands – Does age make a difference? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6, 267–278. 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Kienast, F., Degenhardt, B., Weilenmann, B., Wäger, Y. & Buchecker, M. 2012. GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning 105, 385–399. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliskey, A.D. 2000. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: A spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 52, 33–43. 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00111-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krenichyn, K. 2006. ‘The only place to go and be in the city’: Women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meanings of a large urban park. Health & Place 12, 631–643. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisberg Jensen, E. & Ouis, P. 2008. Contested construction of nature for city fringe outdoor recreation in southern Sweden: The Arrie case. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7, 171–182. 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, D. & Ilbery, B. (eds.) 1987. The Future of the British Rural Landscape. Geo Books, Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Lothian, A. 1999. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44, 177–198. 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, K.K. & Murayama, Y. 2011. Modelling of urban green space walkability: Eco-friendly walk score calculator. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 35, 408–420. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, J. & Verheij, R.A. 2007. Are health benefits of physical activity in natural environments used in primary care by general practitioners in the Netherlands?Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6, 227–233. 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Mäkinen, K. & Tyrväinen, L. 2008. Teenage experiences of public green spaces in suburban Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7, 277–289. 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C., Pouta, E., Gentin, S. & Jensen, F.S. 2010. Outdoor recreation in forest policy and legislation: A European comparison. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9, 303–312. 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinig, D.W. 1976. The beholding eye: Ten versions of the same scene. Landscape Architecture 66, 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, H. 1991. Public recreational access in the countryside: Concepts and measures of physical rigour. Journal of Rural Studies 7, 241–251. 10.1016/0743-0167(91)90087-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, H. 1993. Public access in the West European countryside: A comparative survey. Journal of Rural Studies 9, 39–51. 10.1016/0743-0167(93)90004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, H. 1996. Countryside recreational access in the United States: A statistical comparison of rural districts. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86, 102–122. 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, D., McVittie, A., Allcroft, D.J. & Elston, D.A. 2007. Quantifying public preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: A comparison of methods. Ecological Economics 63, 42–53. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, N. 2003. Black and Minority Ethnic Groups and Public Open Space. OPENspace, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Neuvonen, M., Sievänen, T., Tönnes, S. & Koskela, T. 2007. Access to green areas and the frequency of visits – a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6, 235–247. 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A.B. & Jensen, R.B. 2007. Some visual aspects of planting design and silviculture across contemporary forest management paradigms – perspectives for urban afforestation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6, 143–158. 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Nordisk Ministerråd. 1996. Friluftsliv trenger mer enn arealer – en studie av kriterier og normer for friarealer i kommunal planlegging. TemaNord 591. Nordisk Ministerråd, København.
   Google Scholar
• Ode, Å. & Fry, G. 2006. A model for quantifying and predicting urban pressure on woodland. Landscape and Urban Planning 77, 17–27. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode, Å.K. & Fry, G.L.A. 2002. Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 1, 15–24. 10.1078/1618-8667-00003
   Google Scholar
• Pate, R.R., Pratt, M., Blair, S.N., Haskell, W.L., Macera, C.A. & Bouchard, C. 1995. Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. The Journal of the American Medical Association 273, 402–407. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520290054029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M. & Griffin, M. 2005. The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 15, 319–337. 10.1080/09603120500155963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reusch, M. 2012. Allemannsretten: Friluftslivets rettsgrunnlag. Flux forlag, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, E.A. & Mitchell, R. 2010. Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine 71, 568–575. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rishbeth, C. 2001. Ethnic minority groups and the design of public open space: An inclusive landscape? Landscape Research 26, 351–366. 10.1080/01426390120090148
   Google Scholar
• Sandell, K. & Fredman, P. 2010. The right of public access – opportunity or obstacle for nature tourism in Sweden? Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 10, 291–309. 10.1080/15022250.2010.502366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway, R. 1987. Access to the countryside for outdoor recreation: An Anglo-Dutch comparison. Town Planning Review 58, 401–409.
   Google Scholar
• Skov-Petersen, H. & Goossen, M. 2009. Assessing and planning the supply of opportunities for forest recreation. Bell, S., Simpson, M., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T. & Pröbstl, U. (eds.) European Forest Recreation and Tourism, 134–148. Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Skår, M. 2010. Forest dear and forest fear: Dwellers relationships to their neighbourhood forest. Landscape and Urban Planning 98, 110–116. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, H., Gatersleben, B. & Hartig, T. 1997. Change in mood as a function of environmental design: Arousal and pleasure on a simulated forest hike. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17, 283–300. 10.1006/jevp.1997.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, T. & Ward Thompson, C. 2008. Associations between characteristics of neighbourhood open space and older people's walking. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7, 41–51. 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, K.H. 2000. ‘The green poster’ A method to evaluate the sustainability of the urban green structure. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20, 359–371. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00047-0
   Google Scholar
• Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A., Niemela, J. & James, P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 81, 167–178. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herzele, A. & Wiedemann, T. 2003. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 63, 109–126. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A.M. & Shaw, G. 2009. Future play: Tourism, recreation and land use. Land Use Policy 26, Supplement 1, 326–335. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, K., Pearce, J. & Day, P. 2011. Neighbourhood Destination Accessibility Index: A GIS tool for measuring infrastructure support for neighbourhood physical activity. Environment and Planning A 43, 205–223. 10.1068/a43219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2004. Resolution WHA57.17: Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2010. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. World Health Organization, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Wright Wendel, H.E., Zarger, R.K. & Mihelcic, J.R. 2012. Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning 107, 272–282. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Zandersen, M., Termansen, M. & Jensen, F.S. 2007. Evaluating approaches to predict recreation values of new forest sites. Journal of Forest Economics 13, 103–128. 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar