Business networks and the competitiveness of small manufacturing firms in Sweden's northern periphery

References

• Affärsdata. 2010. Affärsdata. http://www.ad.se/ ( accessed November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 1999. An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23, 365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A.R., Osseichuk, E. & Illingworth, L. 2010. Rural small businesses in turbulent times: Impacts of the economic downturn. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 11, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B. & Lenihan, H. 2008. Networking: A question of firm characteristics? The case of the Shannon region in Ireland. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20, 561–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atterton, J. 2007. The ‘strength of weak ties’: Social networking by business owners in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Sociologia Ruralis 47, 228–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babakus, E., Yavas, U. & Haahti, A. 2006. Perceived uncertainty, networking and export performance – A study of Nordic SMEs. European Business Review 18, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H. & Glückler, J. 2003. Toward a relational economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 3, 117–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birley, S. & Westhead, P. 1990. ‘North–South’ contrasts in the characteristics and performance of small firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 2, 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, J.S. & Rantisi, N.M. 2003. The ‘relational turn’ in economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 3, 109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.A. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39, 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouba-Olga, O. & Carrincazeaux, C. 2001. Les espaces des relations interentreprises: L’exemple des activités de R&D. Flux 2001/4 No. 46, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Broekel, T. & Boschma, R. 2012. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography 12, 409–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, S. & Blankenburg Holm, D. 2000. Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: A network approach. International Business Review 9, 77–93.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, N., Keast, R., Pickernell, D. & Senior, M. 2010. Network structure, knowledge governance, and firm performance: Evidence from innovation networks and SMEs in the UK. Growth and Change 41, 337–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. 1993. The network paradigm: New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11, 543–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Clifton, N. & Olega, M. 2005. Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development. Regional Studies 39, 1065–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coviello, N.E. 2005. Integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques in network analysis. Qualitative Market Research 8, 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Delmar, F., Davidsson, P. & Gartner, W. 2003. Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing 18, 189–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. & Malmberg, A. 2001. Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography 77, 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, J., Jordan, D. & O’Leary, E. 2012. The effects of the frequency of spatially proximate and distant interaction on innovation by Irish SMEs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24, 705–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., Copus, A. & Hedström, M. 2011. Local embeddedness and global links in rural areas: Euclidean and relational space in business networks. Hedberg, C. & do Carmo, R.M. (eds.) Translocal Ruralism, 103–121. Dordrecht: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. n.d. GEOSPECS – Geographic Specificities and Development Potentials in Europe. http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/geospecs.html ( accessed April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2008. NACE Rev. 2: Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF ( accessed April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D. 2004. International entrepreneurship and the small business. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 16, 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A. & Sjøholt, P. 2007. Rural development and embeddedness: The importance of human relations for industrial restructuring in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis 47, 205–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, L., Sanders, J. & Deakins, D. 2011. Rural small firms’ use of the Internet: From global to local. Journal of Rural Studies 27, 254–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garretsen, H. & Martin, R. 2010. Rethinking (new) economic geography models: Taking geography and history more seriously. Spatial Economic Analysis 5, 127–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelsing, L. 1992. Innovation and the development of industrial networks. Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.) National Systems of Innovation, 116–128. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M.S. & Wolfe, D.A. 2006. Spaces of knowledge flows – Clusters in a global context. Asheim, B., Cooke, P. & Martin, R. (eds.) Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations, 218–235. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glesbygdsverket. 2007. Sveriges gles- och landsbygder 2007. Östersund: Glesbygdverket.
   Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus, A. & Schürmann, C. 2006. Northern Peripheral, Sparsely Populated Regions in the European Union and in Norway. Nordregio Report 2006:2. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayter, R., Barnes, T. & Bradshaw, M. 2003. Relocating resource peripheries to the core of economic geography's theorizing. Area 35, 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, M. 2004. ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a re-conceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography 28, 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. 2001. Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: Evaluating the impact of initiatives in the United Kingdom. Research Policy 30, 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. & Johnston, A. 2009. Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth. Growth and Change 40, 227–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. & Johnston, A. 2010. Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22, 457–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. & Williams, N. 2011. Entrepreneurship and regional competitiveness: The role and progression of policy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23, 907–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., Ramírez-Pasillas, M. & Karlsson, G. 2002. The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 14, 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, B. & Quigley, J. 2004 Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies. Papers in Regional Science 83, 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. & Malecki, E.J. 2004. Networking for competitiveness. Small Business Economics 23, 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J. & Oerlemans, L.A.G. 2006. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration. International Journal of Management Reviews 8, 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J. & Oerlemans, L.A.G. 2012. Configurations of inter-organizational knowledge links: Does spatial embeddedness still matter? Regional Studies 46, 1005–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. & Lorentzen, A. 2007. Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions: On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. European Planning Studies 15, 457–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschewski, L., Phillipson, J. & Gorton, M. 2002. The facilitation and formalisation of small business networks: Evidence from the north east of England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20, 375–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C. & Dowling, M. 2003. Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 15, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C., Dowling, M. & Welpe, I. 2006. Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing 21, 514–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C. & Leyronas, C. 2012. The competitive advantage of cluster firms: The priority of regional network position over extra-regional networks – a study of a French high-tech cluster. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24, 457–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. & Geng, S. 2012. Industrial clusters, shared resources and firm performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24, 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, M. (ed.) 2010. Regional Development in the Nordic Countries. Nordregio Report 2010:2. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, A. 2008. Knowledge networks in local and global space. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20, 533–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, J.H., Roper, S. & Hewitt-Dundas, N. 2010. Service innovation, embeddedness and business performance: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Regional Studies 44, 983–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lublinski, A.E. 2003. Does geographic proximity matter? Evidence from clustered and non-clustered aeronautic firms in Germany. Regional Studies 37, 453–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E.J. 2007. Cities and regions competing in the global economy: Knowledge and local development policies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25, 638–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E.J. 2012. Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies 46, 1023–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E.J. & Hospers, G.-J. 2007. Knowledge and the competitiveness of places. Rutten, R. & Boekema, F. (eds.) The Learning Region: Foundations, State of the Art, Future, 143–159. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E.J. & Tootle, D. 1996. The role of networks in small firm competitiveness. International Journal of Technology Management 11, 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. 2002. The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A 34, 429–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, J. 2012. Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies 46, 1085–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 1997. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies 31, 491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyes, D., Whittam, G. & Ferri, P. 2012. A conceptualisation of the relationship capital of rural small service firms. Local Economy 27, 136–151.
   Google Scholar
• Musteen, M., Francis, J. & Datta, D.K. 2010. The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business 45, 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance 4, 69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2004. Inter-firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks – An Integrated Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. & Smallbone, D. 2006 Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe's peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies 14, 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummela, N., Loane, S. & Bell, J. 2006. Change in SME internationalisation: An Irish perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 13, 562–583.
   Google Scholar
• Nuur, C. & Laestadius, S. 2010. Development in peripheral regions: Case studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies 17, 293–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans, L.A.G. & Meeus, M.T.H. 2005. Do organisational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance? Regional Studies 39, 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, C. & Evers, N. 2011. Network intermediaries in the internationalisation of new firms in peripheral regions. International Marketing Review 28, 340–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oinas, P. 1997. On the socio-spatial embeddedness of business firms. Erdkunde 51, 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011. Economists as geographers and geographers as something else: On the changing conception of distance in geography and economics. Journal of Economic Geography 11, 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. 2006. Do clusters or innovation systems drive competitiveness? Asheim, B., Cooke, P. & Martin, R. (eds.) Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations, 164–187. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2007. SNI 2007: Standard för svensknäringsgrensindelning 2007/SNI 2007: Swedish Standard Industrial Classification 2007. http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/OV9999_2007A01_BR_00_X71OP0701.pdf ( accessed November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. n.d. Omsättningsstatistik för näringslivet. http://www.scb.se/HA0102/ ( accessed November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34, 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A. 2008. On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies 42, 869–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A. & Rallet, A. 2005. Proximity and localization. Regional Studies 39, 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, O. 2002. Small Firm, Glocalization Strategy and Proximity. Paper presented at European Council of Small Business –Research in Entrpreneurship and Small Business –16th Conference, 21–22 November 2002, Barcelona, Spain. http://oliviertorres.net/travaux/pdf/ot18barcelona02.pdf ( accessed 15 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkkala, S. 2007. Innovation and networking in peripheral areas – A case study of emergence and change in rural manufacturing. European Planning Studies 15, 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G. & Bianchi, C. 2006. Drivers and dynamic processes for SMEs going global. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 13, 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Young, N. 2006. Distance as a hybrid actor in rural economies. Journal of Rural Studies 22, 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, N. 2010a. Globalization from the edge: A framework for understanding how small and medium-sized firms in the periphery ‘go global’. Environment and Planning A 42, 838–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, N. 2010b. Business networks, collaboration and embeddedness in local and extra-local spaces: The case of Port Hardy, Canada. Sociologia Ruralis 50, 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar