Innovation networks and green restructuring: Which path development can EU Framework Programmes stimulate in Norway?

References

• Aoyama Y. 2011. Editorial: Emerging themes in economic geography: Outcomes of the Economic Geography 2010 Workshop. Economic Geography 87, 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C., Billand P., Frachisse D. & Massard, N. 2007. Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Papers in Regional Science 86(3), 495–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M. & Massard, N. 2013. Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy 42, 196–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.A., Suire, R. & Vicente, J. 2013. Structural and geographical patterns of knowledge networks in emerging technological standards: Evidence from the European GNSS industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22(1), 47–72.
   Google Scholar
• Barabàsi, A.L. & Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M.J. & Scherngell, T. 2013. Is the European R&D network homogeneous? Distinguishing relevant network communities using graph theoretic and spatial interaction modelling approaches. Regional Studies 47, 1283–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. & Hospers, G.J. 2007. The new economic geography of old industrial regions: Universities as global–local pipelines. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25, 779–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C. & Truffer, B. 2011. Technological innovation systems in multi-scalar space: Analyzing an emerging water recycling industry with social network analysis. Geographica Helvetica 66(4), 254–260.
   Google Scholar
• Blomgren, A., Quale, C., Austnes-Underhaug, R., Harstad, A.M., Fjose, S., Wifstad, K., Mellbye, C., Amble, I.B., Nyvold, C.E., Steffensen, T., Viggen, J.R., Iglebæk, F., Arnesen, T. & Hagen, S.E. 2015. Industribyggerne 2015: En kartlegging av ansatte i norske petroleumsrelaterte virksomheter, med et særskilt fokus på leverandørbedriftenes ansatte relater til eksport. Rapport IRIS 2015/031. http://gammelweb.iris.no/internet/student.nsf/199f312efd2a0cacc125680e00635b85/5adee19e7e2f45d3c12580ca00417e81/$FILE/Industribyggerne%202015%20Rapport%20IRIS%202015%20031%20-%20160315.pdf (accessed December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39(1), 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2017. Relatedmess as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies 51, 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Minondo, A. & Navarro, M. 2013. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography 89, 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K. & Truffer, B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies 51, 31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, T. 2015. Entrepreneurship and path dependency in regional development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 27, 202–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S. & Cusmano, L. 2004. Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU Framework Programmes. International Journal of Technology Management 27, 747–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, G. 2014. Italian organisations within the European nanotechnology network: Presence, dynamics and effects. Die Erde 145(4): 241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, G. 2017. Nanotechnology as a proxy to capture regional economic development? New findings from the European Union Framework Programmes. Nanotechnology Reviews 6(2): 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, G. & Quarta, C.A. 2015. The persistence of regional disparities in Italy through the lens of the European Union nanotechnology network. Regional Studies, Regional Science 2(1), 470–479.
   Google Scholar
• Calignano, G. & Hassink, R. 2016. Increasing innovativeness of SMEs in peripheral areas through international networks? The case of Southern Italy. Region 3(1), 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Hansen, T. & Rekers, J.V. 2015a. Innovation policy for grand challenges: An economic geography perspective. Geography Compass 9(9), 483–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Moodysson, J. & Martin, H. 2015b. Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies 49(5), 850–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M. & Herstad, S.J. 2017. Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C 35(4), 600–620.
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 90, 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, J.P.J. & Freel, M. 2010. Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Research Policy 39, 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotti, N.F. & Spithoven, A. 2018. Economic drivers and specialization patterns in the spatial distribution of Framework Programme’s participation. Papers in Regional Science 97(4), 863–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engedal, M.I.A., Fjørtoft, T., Foyn, F., Scordato, L. & Solberg, E. 2017. Omstilling og fornyelse. Solberg, E. & Wendt, K. (eds.) Det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet: Statistikk og indikatorer 2017, 187–202. Oslo: Research Council of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Enger, S.G. & Castellacci, F. 2016. Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis. Scientometrics 109(3), 1611–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Global Green Economy. Science for Environment Policy: Special Issue. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/25si_en.pdf (accessed 6 November 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018–2020: 12. Climate Action, Environment, Resource Efficiency and Raw Materials. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-climate_en.pdf (accessed 13 December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. n.d. NUTS – Nomenclature of the Territorial Units for Statistics: Background. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/background (accessed December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. 2012. Renewable energy technology and path creation: A multi-scalar approach to energy transition in the UK. European Planning Studies 20(5), 791–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R.D. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011a. Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values, and innovation in southwest Norway. European Planning Studies 19(4), 555–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R.D. & Rodrìguez-Pose, A. 2011b. When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A 43(6), 1248–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R.D. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013. Buzz, archipelago economies and the future of intermediate and peripheral areas in a spiky world. European Planning Studies 21(3), 355–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K. 2000. A complexity approach to innovation networks: The case of the aircraft industry (1909–1997). Research Policy 29(2), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32, 277–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. & Schot, J. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36, 399–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. 2007. Networks and heterogeneous performance of cluster firms. Frenken, K. (ed.) Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography, 161–179. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. 2011. Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies 45, 1329–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, H. 2010. Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators. Cambridge Journal of Economics 35, 173–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. & Nilsson, M. 2015. Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? Annals of Regional Science 54(1), 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B. & Trippl, M. 2018. Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(2), 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Norway. 2017. The Government Forwards a Strategy for Green Competitiveness. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/the-government-forwards-a-strategy-for-green-competitiveness/id2575358/ (accessed December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Gunnes, H., Sandven, T. & Spilling, O.R. 2017. Regionale sammenligninger av FoU og innovasjon, Solberg, E. & Wendt, K. (eds.) Det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet: Statistikk og indikatorer 2017, 157–186. Oslo: Research Council of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R.A. & Riddle, M. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. & Coenen, L. 2015. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17, 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, C. & Kreutzer, I. 2016. Grønn konkurransekraft. Rapport fra regjeringens ekspertutvalg for grønn konkurransekraft. http://www.gronnkonkurransekraft.no/files/2016/10/Strategi-for-gr%C3%B8nn-konkurransekraft.pdf (accessed 20 October 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Herstad, S.J., Bloch, C., Ebersberger, B. & van de Velde, E. 2010. National innovation policy and global open innovation: Exploring balances, tradeoffs and complementarities. Science and Public Policy 37, 113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, J., Scherngell, T., Frenken, K. & Tijssen, R. 2013. Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. Journal of Economic Geography 13, 23–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M. & Marvin, S. 2010. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy 39(4), 477–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. 2015. Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography 15(3), 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2018. Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. Isaksen, A., Martin, R. & Trippl, M. (eds.) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems – Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, 221–238. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, N., Hazcic, I. & Popp, D. 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics 45(1), 133–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P. & Virkamäki, V. 2014. Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance 24, 28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. & Rip, A. 2014. The Challenge of Addressing Grand Challenges. Brussels: European Research and Innovation Area Board (ERIAB).
   Google Scholar
• Lawhon, M. & Murphy, J.T. 2012. Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography 36, 354–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitie, T., Andersen, A.D., Hanson, J., Normann, H.E. & Thune, T.M. 2018a. Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector’s influence on offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production 177, 813–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitie, T., Normann, H.E., Thune, T.M. & Sraml Gonzalez, J. 2018b. The Green Flings: Market Fluctuations and Incumbent Energy Industries’ Engagement in Renewable Energy. TIK Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20180524. Oslo: University of Oslo, TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J. 2018. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy 3, 628–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J. & Truffer, B. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37, 596–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2010. Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6(4), 395–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2015. The green entrepreneurial state. Scoones, I., Leach, M. & Newell, P. (eds.) The Politics of Green Transformations, 134–153. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Must, Ü. 2010. Collaboration in EU Framework Programmes: The case of the social sciences and humanities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 23, 79–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R. 2002. Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in. Research Policy 31, 795–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M. & Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths. Economic Geography 87, 237–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norges Bank. 2015. Oil and the Norwegian Economy – the Challenges Ahead. Speech by Governor Øystein Olsen at a lunch hosted by Danske Bank Markets, New York City, 27 March 2015. http://www.norges-bank.no/en/Published/Speeches/2015/27032015-Olsen-New-York/ (accessed 6 November 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Paci, R. & Batteta, E. 2003. Innovation Networks and Knowledge Flows across the European Regions. CRENoS Working Paper No. 13/03. Cagliari: CRENoS – Centro Ricerche Economiche Nord Sud.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Neely, A., Walsh, K. 2011. How should firms evaluate success in university-industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management 41(2), 202–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piro, F.N., Scordato, L. & Aksnes, D.W. 2016. Choosing the Right Partners: Norwegian Participation in European Framework Programmes. NIFU report 2016:41. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W.W. & Grodal, S. 2005. Networks of innovators. Fagerberg, I., Mowery, D.C. & Nelson, R.R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 56–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger-Schluga, T. & Barber M.J. 2008. R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes: Data processing, network construction and selected results. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 4(3–4), 321–347.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, K.S. & Reichardt, K. 2016. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept andframework for analysis. Research Policy 45, 1620–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T. & Barber, M.J. 2009. Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science 88(3), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T.S., Schneider, M., Rogge, K.S., Schuetz, M.J.A. & Hoffmann, V.H. 2012.The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: A survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2, 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2017. Registrerte arbeidsledige: Tabell 10540 Registrerte arbeidsledige 15–74 år, etter alder (prosent). www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken (accessed 6 November 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. & Hansen, G.H. 2014. Same sea, different ponds: Cross-sectorial knowledge spillovers in the North Sea. European Planning Studies 22(10), 2030–2049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. & Hansen, G.H. 2018. Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography 94(2), 188–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. & Weaver, T. 2017. Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Research Policy 46, 1071–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. & Liu, K. 2016. Proximity effect, preferential attachment and path dependence in inter-regional network: A case of China’s technology transaction. Scientometrics 108, 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M. & Isaksen, A. 2017. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography 42(5), 687–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B. 2008. Society, technology, and region: Contributions from the social study of technology to economic geography. Environment and Planning A 40, 966–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B. & Coenen, L. 2012. Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies 46(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34, 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2013. Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. Cooke, P. (ed.) Re-framing Regional Development: Evolution, Innovation and Transition, 297–317. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. & Gee, S. 2013. Transforming urban waste into sustainable material and energy usage: The case of Greater Manchester (UK). Journal of Cleaner Production 50, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T. & Lata, R. 2015. Embeddedness of European regions in European Union-funded research and development (R&D) networks: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies 49, 1685–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R. & Menichetti, E. 2012. Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy 40(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar