The processes of incorporation and secession of urban and suburban municipalities: The case of Poland

References

• Allers, M.A. & Geertsema, J.B. 2016. The effects of local government amalgamation on public spending, taxation, and service levels: Evidence from 15 years of municipal consolidation. Journal of Regional Science 56(4), 659–682. doi: 10.1111/jors.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrusz, G. 1996. Structural change and boundary instability. Andrusz, G., Harloe, M. & Szelenyi, I. (eds.) Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-socialist Societies, 30–69. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Andrusz, G., Harloe, M. & Szelenyi, I. (eds.), 1996. Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-socialist Societies. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G. & Warner, M.E. 2015. Inter-municipal cooperation and costs: Expectations and evidence. Public Administration 93(1), 52–67. doi: 10.1111/padm.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blesse, S. & Baskaran, T. 2013. Do Municipal Mergers Result in Scale Economies? Evidence from a German Federal State. Centre for European Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers No. 176. Göttingen: Centre for European Governance and Economic Development Research, University of Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 2010. Municipal amalgamations and common pool problems: The Danish local government reform in 2007. Scandinavian Political Studies 33(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borraz, O. & Le Galès, P. 2005. France: The inter-municipal revolution. Denters, B. & Rose, L.E. (eds.) Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments, 12–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brade, I., Herfert, G. & Wiest, K. 2009. Recent trends and future prospects of sociospatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities 26(5), 233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, R. & Penn, A. 2004. Scaling and universality in the micro-structure of urban space. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 332, 539–547. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2003.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattan, N. (ed.) 2007. Cities and Networks in Europe: A Critical Approach of Polycentrism. Esher: John Libbey Eurotext.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, A.G. 2001. A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations. Urban Studies 38(4), 657–677. doi: 10.1080/00420980120035277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. & Jonas, A. 1999. Reimagining Berlin. World city, national capital or ordinary place? European Urban and Regional Studies 6(2), 145–164. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, D. & Reid, S. (eds.) 2002. Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, P. & Hopkinson, M. 1996. The Geography of Settlement: Conceptual Frameworks in Geography. Harlow: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2003. Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies 11(8), 979–999. doi: 10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B. & Crase, L. 2004. Is bigger local government better? An evaluation of the case for Australian municipal amalgamation programs. Urban Policy and Research 22(3), 265–275. doi: 10.1080/0811114042000269290
   Google Scholar
• Firmino, R.J. 2005. Planning the unplannable: How local authorities integrate urban and ICT policy making. Journal of Urban Technology 12(2), 49–69. doi: 10.1080/10630730500307979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, W.F. 2006. Will consolidation improve sub-national governments? Policy Research Working Paper 3913. World Bank. http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/decentralizationcorecourse2006/OtherReadings/FoxGurley.pdf (accessed March 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1999. The future of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 23(3), 173–185. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00014-9
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2009. Polycentricity. Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography Vol. 8, 260–264. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hanes, N. 2015. Amalgamation impacts on local public expenditures in Sweden. Local Government Studies 41(1), 63–77. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.869496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S.W. 2009. Towards Genesis or the Grave: Financial Effects of Local Government Mergers. PhD thesis. Odense: Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Syddansk Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, M., Goldstein, N.C. & Clarke, K.C. 2003. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 86(3), 286–302. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnerich, B.T. 2009. Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform? Journal of Public Economics 93(5–6), 721–728. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, S. 2013. Whatever happened to the (post) socialist city? Cities 32, S29–S38. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., Fry, J., Charbonneau, E., Riccucci, N., Henderson, A., Kwak, S. & Burnash, E. 2009. Literature Review and Analysis Related to Municipal Government Consolidation. Newark, NJ: Rutgers-Newark School of Public Affairs and Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Ingalls, G. & Rassel, G. 2005. Political fragmentation, municipal incorporation and annexation in a high growth urban area: The case of Charlotte, North Carolina. The North Carolina Geographer 13, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jordahl, H. & Liang, C.Y. 2010. Merged municipalities, higher debt: On free-riding and the common pool problem in politics. Public Choice 143(1–2), 157–172. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9495-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kancelaria Sejmu. n.d. USTAWA z dnia 8marca 1990 r.o samorządzie gminnym Rozdział 1 Przepisy ogólne. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19900160095/U/D19900095Lj.pdf (accessed 27 March 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Kasanko, M., Barredo, J.I., Lavalle, C., McCormick, N., Demicheli, L., Sagris, V. & Brezger, A. 2006. Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 77(1–2), 111–130. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayanagi, T. 2003. Changes in the urban structure of Joetsu City after municipal amalgamation. Geographical Review of Japan 76(5), 367−376. doi: 10.4157/grj.76.367
   Google Scholar
• Korcelli, P. 1972. Urban spatial growth: A wave-like approach. Geographia Polonica 24, 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Korcelli, P. 2005. Pojęcie policentryczności a współczesne przemiany systemów miast. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 219, 146–155.
   Google Scholar
• Kramar, H. & Kadi, J. 2013. Polycentric city networks in Central-Eastern Europe: Existing concepts and empirical findings. Geographia Polonica 86(3), 183–198. doi: 10.7163/GPol.2013.18
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P.R. 1997. Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krzysztofik, R. 2014. Geneza aglomeracji miast na obszarze Polski. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.
   Google Scholar
• Krzysztofik, R., Kantor-Pietraga, I., Runge, A. & Spórna, T. 2017. Is the suburbanisation stage always important in the transformation of large urban agglomerations? The case of the Katowice conurbation. Geographia Polonica 90(2), 71–85. doi: 10.7163/GPol.0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubeš, J. 2013. European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature. Bulletin of Geography: Socio-economic Series 19, 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, J. & Siegel, D. 2005. Citizen satisfaction with municipal amalgamations. Canadian Public Administration 48(1), 73–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2005.tb01599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, W., Tötzer, T., Köstl, M. & Steinnocher, K. 2007. Simulation of polycentric urban growth dynamics through agents. Koomen E., Stillwell J., Bakema A. & Scholten H.J. (eds.) Modelling Land-use Change, 219–236. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Loibl, W., Etminan, G., Gebetsroither-Geringer, E., Neumann, H.M. & Sanchez-Guzman, S. 2018. Characteristics of Urban Agglomerations in Different Continents: History, Patterns, Dynamics, Drivers and Trends. https://www.intechopen.com/books/urban-agglomeration/characteristics-of-urban-agglomerations-in-different-continents-history-patterns-dynamics-drivers-an (accessed 22 March 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Mabuchi, M. 2001. Municipal Amalgamation in Japan. Washington: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Miszewska, B. & Szmytkie, R. 2015. Morphological processes in the spatial structure of the southern district of Wrocław city. Bulletin of Geography: Socio-economic Series 27, 133–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, A. & Uusitalo, R. 2013. The impact of municipal mergers on local public expenditures in Finland. Public Finance and Management 13(3), 148.
   Google Scholar
• Poel, D. 2000. Amalgamation perspectives: Citizen responses to municipal consolidation. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 23(1), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y. 2012. Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics 72(2–3), 240–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, K.T., Waldner, L.S. & Smith, R.M. 2014. Why new cities form: An examination into municipal incorporation in the United States 1950–2010. Journal of Planning Literature 29(2), 140–154. doi: 10.1177/0885412213512331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. 1988. Monocentric vs. polycentric models: The future of urban economics in regional science. The Annals of Regional Science 22(2), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/BF01287319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romann, M. 1989. Divided perception in a united city: The case of Jerusalem. Boal, F. & Livingstone, D.N. (eds.) The Behavioural Environment, 182–201. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Śleszyński, P. 2018. The problem of territorial division of the Warsaw Metropolitan Area and its implications for Poland [English summary]. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 2(72), 46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R.M. 2011. City limits? The impact of annexation on the frequency of municipal incorporation in North Carolina. Southeastern Geographer 51(3), 422–442. doi: 10.1353/sgo.2011.0024
   Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K. 2007. Taking stock of post-socialist urban development: A recapitulation. Stanilov, K. (ed.) The Post-socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism, 3–17. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K. & Sýkora, L. (eds.) 2014. Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P. 2010. If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? An east European perspective. Local Government Studies 36(2), 183–203. doi: 10.1080/03003930903560547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sýkora, L. 1999. Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal 49(1), 79–89. doi: 10.1023/A:1007076000411
   Google Scholar
• Sýkora, L. & Ouředníček, M. 2007. Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague, Brno, the Czech Republic. Razin E., Dijst M. & Vázquez, C. (eds.) Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas, 209–233. GeoJournal Library 91. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Szelenyi, I. 1996. Cities under socialism – and after. Andrusz, G., Harloe, M. & Szelenyi I. (eds.) Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies, 286–317. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Szendzielorz, K. 2013. Radzionków: 15 lat po odłączeniu od Bytomia http://tarnowskiegory.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/radzionkow15-lat-po-odlaczeniu-od-bytomia,1808565,art,t,id,tm.html (accessed 20 March 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Szmytkie, R. 2003. Znaczenie osiedli miejskich w kształtowaniu systemu osadniczego Polski w okresie. Czasopismo Geograficzne 74(1–2), 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Szmytkie, R. 2009. Miasta-zlepieńce na Śląsku Dolnym i Opolskim. Rozprawy Naukowe Instytutu Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego 6. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
   Google Scholar
• Szmytkie, R. 2016. Dezintegracja zlepieńców miejsko-wiejskich w Polsce w latach 2008-2016. Prace Geograficzne 147, 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sznura, Ł. 2010. Kórnik – Bnin chce odzyskać prawa miejskie. http://poznan.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/kornik-bnin-chce-odzyskac-prawa-miejskie,659856,art,t,id,tm.html (accessed 20 March 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Szymańska, D., Grzelak-Kostulska, E. & Hołowiecka, B. 2009. Polish towns and the changes in their areas and population densities. Bulletin of Geography: Socio-economic Series 11, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Taubenböck, H., Esch, T., Felbier, A., Wiesner, M., Roth, A. & Dech, S. 2012. Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 117, 162−176. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyen, D. 2010. United City, Divided Memories? Cold War Legacies in Contemporary Berlin. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vojnovic, I. 2000. The transitional impacts of municipal consolidations. Journal of Urban Affairs 22(4), 385–417. doi: 10.1111/0735-2166.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehand, J.W.R. 1988. Urban fringe belts: Development of an idea. Planning Perspectives 3(1), 47−58. doi: 10.1080/02665438808725651
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. 2005. The two waves of territorial reforms of local government in Germany. Meligrana, J. (ed.) Redrawing Local Government Boundaries: An International Study of Politics, Procedures and Decisions, 106–129. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F. 1998. An experiment on the generic polycentricity of urban growth in a cellular automatic city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25(5), 731−752. doi: 10.1068/b250731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, W., Liu, Y. & Fan, P. 2010. Polycentric urban development: The case of Hangzhou. Environment and Planning A 42(3), 563−577. doi: 10.1068/a42116
   Google Scholar