Entrepreneurial causation and effectuation logics in a regional context: Assessing the importance of population density

References

• Aarstad, J. 2014. Structural holes and entrepreneurial decision making. Entrepreneurship Research Journal 4, 261–276. doi: 10.1515/erj-2013-0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Haugland, S.A. & Greve, A. 2010. Performance spillover effects in entrepreneurial networks: Assessing a dyadic theory of social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34, 1003–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Pettersen, I.B. & Henriksen, K.-E. 2016a. Entrepreneurial experience and access to critical resources: A learning perspective. Baltic Journal of Management 11, 89–107. doi: 10.1108/BJM-09-2014-0141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O.A. & Jakobsen, S.-E. 2016b. Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy 45, 844–856. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O.A. & Jakobsen, S.E. 2019. Location decisions of enterprise R&D investments as a function of related and unrelated regional industry structures: A multilevel study. Papers in Regional Science 98, 779–797. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z.J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D.B. & Carlsson, B. 2009. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 32, 15–30. doi: 10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arend, R.J., Sarooghi, H. & Burkemper, A. 2015. Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review 40, 630–651. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T. & Gertler, M.S. 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. & Nelson, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28, 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Roy, V.V., Leten, B. & Thijs, B. 2014. Academic research strengths and multinational firms’ foreign R&D location decisions: Evidence from R&D investments in European regions. Environment and Planning A 46, 920–942. doi: 10.1068/a45536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, H., Jelinek, M., Reymen, I. & Stultiens, R. 2014. Product innovation processes in small firms: Combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31, 616–635. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, P. 2012. Knowledge, diversity and entrepreneurship: A spatial analysis of new firm formation in Great Britain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24, 641–660. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2011.617786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A. & Küpper, D. 2012. Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing 27, 167–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110, 349–399. doi: 10.1086/421787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K. & Los, B. 2015. Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies 49, 767–781. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, G.N., DeTienne, D.R., McKelvie, A. & Mumford, T.V. 2011. Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing 26, 375–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L. 2007. The role of universities in the regional innovation systems of the north east of England and Scania, Sweden: Providing missing links? Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 25, 803–821. doi: 10.1068/c0579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. 2003. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 18, 301–331. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. 2012. Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36, 1019–1051. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., van Oort, F. & Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J. & Politis, D. 2011. Career motives and entrepreneurial decision-making: Examining preferences for causal and effectual logics in the early stage of new ventures. Small Business Economics 36, 281–298. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9217-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galkina, T. & Chetty, S. 2015. Effectuation and networking of internationalizing SMEs. Management International Review 55, 647–676. doi: 10.1007/s11575-015-0251-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, S. & Karri, R. 2006. Entrepreneurs, effectual logic, and over-trust. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30, 477–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høvig, Ø.S., Pettersen, I.B. & Aarstad, J. 2018. Entrepreneurial causation vs. effectuation in a business incubation context: Implications for recruiting policy and management. Entrepreneurship Research Journal 8, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40497-018-0087-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. & Thompson, P. 2014. Culture, entrepreneurship and uneven development: A spatial analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 26, 726–752. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2014.985740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundt, C. & Sternberg, R. 2016. Explaining new firm creation in Europe from a spatial and time perspective: A multilevel analysis based upon data of individuals, regions and countries. Papers in Regional Science 95, 223–258. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. 2016. Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Parrilli, M., Fitjar, R. & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (eds.) Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, 66–84. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E. & Lorentzen, T. 2015. Between bonding and bridging: Regional differences in innovative collaboration in Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 69, 80–89. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2015.1016550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E., Engesæter, P., Kvitastein, O., Mæhle, N., Nesheim, T. & Aarstad, J. 2017. Midtveisevaluering av Sivas Inkubatorprogram og Næringshageprogram Rapport 01/17. Bergen: Samfunns- og næringslivsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Kibler, E. 2013. Formation of entrepreneurial intentions in a regional context. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25, 293–323. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2012.721008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K.J., Danserau, F. & Hall, R. 1994. Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review 19, 195–229. doi: 10.5465/amr.1994.9410210745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, A.M. & Marcinkowski, A. 2014. Clusters versus cluster initiatives, with focus on the ICT sector in Poland. European Planning Studies 22, 20–45. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.731040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99, 483–499. doi: 10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J.B. Jr. & Iversen, G.R. 1979. Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L.M. 2017. A status-based multilevel model of ethnic diversity and work unit performance. Journal of Management 43, 426–454. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liñán, F., Urbano, D. & Guerrero, M. 2011. Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23, 187–215. doi: 10.1080/08985620903233929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S. & Patil, A. 2006. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science 52, 1865–1883. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Rypestøl, J.O. 2018. Linking content and technology: On the geography of innovation networks in the Bergen media cluster. Industry and Innovation 25, 966–989. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2017.1343132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M.L. & King, J.S. 2015. Extending constructivist perspectives on opportunity production through an incorporation of effectual logics. Entrepreneurship Research Journal 5, 323–345. doi: 10.1515/erj-2014-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R.M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41, 673–690. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogdul, H.G. 2010. Urban and rural definitions in regional context: A case study on Turkey. European Planning Studies 18, 1519–1541. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.492589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G.I.P. & Pinelli, D. 2006. Market potential and productivity: Evidence from Finnish regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics 36, 636–657. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J.T., Chandler, G.N. & Markova, G. 2012. Entrepreneurial effectuation: A review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36, 837–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W. & Bryk, A.S. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Research Council of Norway. 2011. Report on Science & Technology – Indicators for Norway. Oslo: Research Council of Norway. https://www.forskningsradet.no/siteassets/publikasjoner/1253970503744.pdf (accessed August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro-Soriano, D. 2017. Small business and entrepreneurship: Their role in economic and social development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 29, 1–3. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1255438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. 1985. Issues of levels in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives. Cummings, L.L. & Staw, B.M. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 7, 1–37. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rypestøl, J.O. & Aarstad, J. 2018. Entrepreneurial innovativeness and growth ambitions in thick vs. thin regional innovation systems. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 30, 639–661. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2018.1444104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S.D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26, 243–263. doi: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. & Kotha, S. 2001. Managing knightian uncertainty in the new economy. Butler, J. (ed.) E-Commerce and Entrepreneurship, 31–62. IAP (Information Age Publishing). e-book. https://www.infoagepub.com/authors/john-e-butler (accessed August 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25, 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedschlag, I., Smith, D., Turcu, C. & Zhang, X. 2013. What determines the location choice of R&D activities by multinational firms? Research Policy 42, 1420–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V., Broberg, A.L. & Overgaard, J. 2002. Does location matter for firms’ R&D behaviour? Empirical evidence for Danish firms. Regional Studies 36, 825–832. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000012270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H.L., Chapman, D., Wood, P., Barnes, T. & Romeo, S. 2014. Entrepreneurial academics and regional innovation systems: The case of spin-offs from London’s universities. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 32, 341–359. doi: 10.1068/c11159b
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T.A.B. 2011. Multilevel analysis. Lovric, M. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 879–882. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2017. Stata 15. College Station, TX StataCorp LP. https://www.stata.com/ (accessed 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. 2018a. Auken i nyetableringar held fram. https://www.ssb.no/virksomheter-foretak-og-regnskap/artikler-og-publikasjoner/auken-i-nyetableringar-held-fram–348161 (accessed 2 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. 2018b. Standard for økonomiske regioner. https://www.ssb.no/klass/klassifikasjoner/108/versjon/966/koder (accessed August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå 2018c. 2018. Standard for økonomisk regioner. https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/nos_d383/nos_d383.pdf (accessed August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. n.d.,a. Befolkning: 07459: Alders- og kjønnsfordeling i kommuner, fylker og hele landets befolkning (K) 1986–2019. https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/07459/ (accessed August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. n.d.,b. Areal av land og ferskvatn. https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/09280/ (accessed August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Svare, H. & Gausdal, A.H. 2015. Strengthening regional innovation through network-based innovation brokering. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 27, 619–643. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2015.1095945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli, S. & Carbonara, N. 2014. The role of knowledge variety and intensity for regional innovation. Small Business Economics 43, 493–509. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9547-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turro, A., Alvarez, C. & Urbano, D. 2016. Intrapreneurship in the Spanish context: A regional analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 28, 380–402. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1162850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S.G. & Dohse, D. 2012. Why mode and regional context matter for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24, 807–835. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2012.721009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixe, S. 2015. The impact of spatial externalities: Skills, education and plant productivity. Regional Sudies 12, 2053–2069. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.891729
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C.-H. & Hayakawa, K. 2015. Localization and overseas R&D activity: The case of Taiwanese multinational enterprises in China. R&D Management 45, 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H., Yun, S., Lee, J. & Phillips, F. 2015. Entrepreneurship in East Asian regional innovation systems: Role of social capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 100, 83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W. 2011. Regional deregulation and entrepreneurial growth in China’s transition economy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23, 853–876. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2011.577816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar