Evolving geographies of innovation: existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives

References

• Asheim, B.T. 1996. Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies 4(4), 379–400. doi: 10.1080/09654319608720354
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T. & Coenen, L. 2005. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy 34(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T. & Gertler, M.S. 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. & Nelson, R.R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., Coenen, L. & Moodysson, J. 2015. Methods and applications of regional innovation systems analysis. Karlsson, C. & Andersson, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography, 272–290. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M. & Trippl, M. 2017. Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics. Economic Geography 93(5), 429–435. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. 2019. Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera, F., Negri, N. & Salento, A. 2018. From individual choice to collective voice: Foundational economy, local commons and citizenship. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia 59(2), 371–397.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf (accessed 4 November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2012. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentham, J., Bowman, A., de la Cuesta, M., Engelen, E., Erturk, I., Folkman, P., Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., Moran, M. & Williams, K. 2013. Manifesto for the Foundational Economy. CRESC Working Paper 131. http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cresc/workingpapers/wp131.pdf (accessed 8 February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, G. & Pugalis, L., 2014. Shifting paradigms: People-centred models, active regional development, space-blind policies and place-based approaches. Local Economy 29(4–5), 283–294. doi: 10.1177/0269094214541355
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, G. 1998. Requiem for the Third Italy? Rise and fall of a too successful concept. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 10(2), 93–116. doi: 10.1080/08985629800000006
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C. & Truffer, B. 2017. Global innovation systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy 46(7), 1284–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breau, S., Kogler, D.F. & Bolton, K.C. 2014. On the relationship between innovation and wage inequality: New evidence from Canadian cities. Economic Geography 90(4), 351–373. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M., Coenen, L., Marques, P. & Morgan, K. 2017. Governing system innovation: Assisted living experiments in the UK and Norway. European Planning Studies 25(12), 2138–2156. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1349078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T.G. & Coe, N.M. 2001. Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human Geography 25(4), 569–589. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. & Capello, R. 2013. Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change 44(2), 355–389. doi: 10.1111/grow.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L. 2018. Resilience in the Face of Sustainability Crises: In Innovation the Problem or the Answer? MSSI Oration Series Paper No. 2. Melbourne: Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, University of Melbourne. https://sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/3110453/MSSI_Oration_2018.pdf (accessed 23 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M.M. & Herstad, S.J. 2017. Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35(4), 600–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Campbell, S. & Wiseman, J. 2018. Regional innovation systems and transformative dynamics: Transitions in coal regions in Australia and Germany. Isaksen, A., Martin, R. & Trippl, M. (eds.) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems-Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, 199–220. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2005. Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organisation. Research Policy 34(8), 1128–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G. & Etxebarria, G. 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy 26(4–5), 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, M.S. 2011. Organizational change and employee stress. Management Science 57(2), 240–256. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercks, G., Larsen, H. & Steward, F. 2019. Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy 48(4), 880–894. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2002. What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society 24(3), 243–263. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, E., Froud, J., Johal, S., Salento, A. & Williams, K. 2017. The grounded city: From competitivity to the foundational economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10(3), 407–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 2018. Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy 47(9), 1568–1576. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, P. 2017. When politics meets economic complexity: Doing things differently in the Gippsland region, Australia. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies 23(3), 400–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K. & Uyarra, E. 2016. Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation 23(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. & Mellander, C. 2016. The geography of inequality: Difference and determinants of wage and income inequality across US metros. Regional Studies 50(1), 79–92. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.884275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foundational Economy Collective. 2018. Foundational Economy: The Infrastructure of Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., Hekkert, M.P. & Jacobsson, S. 2008. The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20(5), 521–536. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J. & Moodysson, J. 2019. Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy 48(4), 1048–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. & Winther, L. 2011. Innovation, regional development and relations between high-and low-tech industries. European Urban and Regional Studies 18(3), 321–339. doi: 10.1177/0969776411403990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. & Morgan, K. 2012. Spaces of innovation: Learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Regional Studies 46(8), 1041–1053. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.672725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R.G. 2008. Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3), 303–320. doi: 10.1080/13604810802479126
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Martin, R. & Trippl, M. (eds.) 2018. New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems: Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. & Lundvall, B.Å. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36(5), 680–693. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, R. 2007. Inverting sustainable development? Rethinking ecology, innovation and spatial limits. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 6(3), 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F. & Caprotti, F. (eds.) 2019. Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2014. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.A. 1996. The Social Dimension of the Learning Economy. Druid Working Paper No. 96-1. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/202b/775ebcdbcaf8fd7c052f9a37a23776a3ea13.pdf (accessed 23 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P., Morgan, K. & Richardson, R. 2018. Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(3), 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Moodysson, J. 2013. Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies 20(2), 170–187. doi: 10.1177/0969776411427326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2015. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018a. Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change 27(5), 803–815. doi: 10.1093/icc/dty034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018b. Mission-oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, J.T., Benneworth, P. & Phelps, N.A. (eds.) 2015. Making 21st Century Knowledge Complexes: Technopoles of the World Revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Coenen, L. & Asheim, B. 2008. Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40(5), 1040–1056. doi: 10.1068/a39110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2004. The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1093/jeg/4.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2017. Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35(4), 569–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2018. Experimental Governance and Territorial Tevelopment. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Morgan(2018)ExperimentalGovernanceAndTerritorialDevelopment_OECD_FINAL.pdf (accessed 4 November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. 2003. Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies 37(3), 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. 2013. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2014. The Radical’s Dilemma: An Overview of the Practice and Prospects of Social and Public Labs – Version 1. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/social_and_public_labs_-_and_the_radicals_dilemma.pdf (accessed 4 November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S. & Jasanoff, S. 2017. Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science 47(6), 783–810. doi: 10.1177/0306312717706110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picciotto, R., 2015. Democratic evaluation for the 21st century. Evaluation 21(2), 150–166. doi: 10.1177/1356389015577511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Tomaney, J. 2007. What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies 41(9), 1253–1269. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14(1), 15–34. doi: 10.1177/089124240001400105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Hoskins, B., Ramanathan, V., Schlosser, P., Brasseur, G.P. & Gaffney, O. 2016. The world’s biggest gamble. Earth’s Future 10, 465–470. doi: 10.1002/2016EF000392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2004. Industrial Policy for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1), 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. & Zeitlin, J. 2012. Experimentalist governance. Levi-Faur, D. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Governance, 169–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. 1996. Regional Advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. & Rip, A. 1997. The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54(2–3), 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J. & Steinmueller, W.E. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47(9), 1554–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. & Smith, A. 2007. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics 16(4), 584–603. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2012. Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities 29, 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., Carrincazeaux, C. & Doloreux, D. (eds.) 2016. Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøtun, S.G. & Njøs, R. 2019. Green reorientation of clusters and the role of policy: ‘The normative’ and ‘the neutral’ route. European Planning Studies 27(12), 2411–2430. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1630370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, E. & Acuto, M. 2018. Networking cities after Paris: Weighing the ambition of urban climate change experimentation. Global Policy 9(4), 549–559. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42(9), 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2018. Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies 26(9), 1779–1795. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B. & Coenen, L. 2012. Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies 46(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., Wilson, J.R. & Sotarauta, M. 2017. Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35(4), 559–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Ribeiro, B. & Dale-Clough, L. 2019. Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: Responsibility and the quest for public value. European Planning Studies 27(12), 2359–2375. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1609425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2012. Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. Dusseldorp, M. & Beecroft, R. (eds.) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren, 39–61. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K.M. & Rohracher, H. 2012. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy 41(6), 1037–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar