Collaborative routes to innovation success in the periphery – a configurational approach

References

• Asheim, B.T. & Isaksen, A. 2002. Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1), 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. & Gertler, M. 2005. The geography of innovation. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. & Nelson, R.R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. 2019. Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39(1), 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. & Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6, 273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, G., Nilsen, T., Jørgensen Nordli, A., & Hauge, A. 2022. Beyond ‘periphery’: A detailed and nuanced taxonomy of the Norwegian regions. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 106(1), 49–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G. & Etxebarria, G. 1998. Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A 30(9), 1563–1584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. & Dionne, S. 2008. Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20(3), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. 2015. Business networks and the competitiveness of small manufacturing firms in Sweden's northern periphery. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 69(3), 135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, J. 2019. Innovation in the periphery: A critical survey and research agenda. International Regional Science Review 42(2), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, J. & Trippl, M. 2019. Innovation in the periphery: Compensation and exploitation strategies. Growth and Change 50(4), 1511–1531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J. & Fagerberg, J. 2017. Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33(1), 2–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (ed.) 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. n.d. ‘Overview’. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts (accessed 27 May 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 2005. Innovation: A guide to the literature. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. & Nelson, R.R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 29–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R.D. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011. Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies 19(4), 555–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R., Adler, P. & Mellander, C. 2017. The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies 51(1), 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. & Wyrwich, M. 2021. Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison. Research Policy 50(6): Article 104237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., Shearmur, R., & Martinus, K. 2023. From liability to opportunity? Reconceptualizing periphery and its role in Innovation. Journal of Economic Geography 23(1), 231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. & Nilsson, M. 2015. Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science 54(1), 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. & Sotarauta, M. 2020. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography 44(4), 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies 53(11), 1636–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. 2016. Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Parrilli, M.D., Fitjar, R.D. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (eds.) Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, 66–84. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E. & Lorentzen, T. 2015. Between bonding and bridging: Regional differences in innovative collaboration in Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 69(2), 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6(4), 395–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. 2010. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. Boschma, R. & Martin, R. (eds.) Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 62–92. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M. & Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87(3), 237–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., Grillitsch, M. & Hauge, A.J. 2022. Varieties of periphery and local agency in regional development. Regional Studies 57(4), 749–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD & Eurostat. 2018. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th ed. Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities series. Paris: OECD/Luxembourg: Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. & Dubois, A. 2021. Peripheries within economic geography: Four ‘problems’ and the road ahead of us. Journal of Rural Studies 87, 267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. 1999. Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity. Health Services Research 34(5, Pt 2), 1225–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., Strand, S.I. & Rubinson, C. 2008. User’s Guide to Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis. https://sites.socsci.uci.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/download/fsQCAManual.pdf (accessed 2 March 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Regjeringen.no n.d. ‘Fylkesinndelingen fra 2024’. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/kommuner-og-regioner/kommunestruktur/fylkesinndelingen-fra-2024/id2922222/ (accessed 27 May 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P.G., Díaz-Puente, J.M. & Bettoni, M. 2022. How rurality influences interactive innovation processes: Lessons learnt from 15 case studies in 12 countries. European Planning Studies 30(12), 2595–2617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C.Q. & Wagemann, C. 2010. Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology 9(3), 397–418.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C.Q. & Wagemann, C. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2011. Innovation, regions and proximity: From neo-regionalism to spatial analysis. Regional Studies 45(9), 1225–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2017. Urban bias in innovation studies. Bathelt, H., Cohendet, P., Henn, S. & Simon, L. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach, 440–456. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2001. Classification of Economic Regions. https://www.ssb.no/a/english/publikasjoner/pdf/nos_c634_en/nos_c634_en.pdf (accessed 30 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. 2017. ‘Ny sentralitetsindeks for kommunene’. https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/ny-sentralitetsindeks-for-kommunene (accessed 30 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, M. & Rasmussen, E. 2016. How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research 69(3), 1250–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8), 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Cristofoli, D., Gloor, P.A., Meijer, A.J. & Trivellato, B. 2020. Taming the snake in paradise: Combining institutional design and leadership to enhance collaborative innovation. Policy and Society 39(4), 592–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H., Polley, D.E., Garud, R. & Venkataraman, S. 2008. The Innovation Journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkala, S. 2007. Innovation and networking in peripheral areas—a case study of emergence and change in rural manufacturing. European Planning Studies 15(4), 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar