11,666
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The Temporality of the Landscape Revisited

References

  • Alberti, B., Jones, A., and Pollard, J., eds., 2013. Archaeology after interpretation: returning materials to archaeological theory. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  • Auslander, P., 1997, Against ontology: making distinctions between the live and the mediatized. Performance Research, 2 (3), 50–55. doi:10.1080/13528165.1997.10871569
  • Bender, B., 2001, Landscapes-on-the-move. Journal of Social Archaeology, 1 (1), 75–89. doi:10.1177/146960530100100106
  • Blocker, J., 1999. Where is Ana Mendieta: identity, performativity, and exile. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Buchli, V., 2016. An archaeology of the immaterial. London: Routledge.
  • Childe, V.G., 1958a, Retrospect. Antiquity, 32 (126), 69–74.
  • Childe, V.G., 1958b, Valediction. Bulletin of the London Institute of Archaeology, 1, 1–8.
  • Deetz, J.F., 1988. History and archaeological theory: Walter Taylor revisited. American Antiquity, 53, 13–22. doi:10.2307/281151
  • Descola, P., 2013. Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Edgeworth, M., 2003. Acts of discovery: an ethnography of archaeological practice. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • Edmonds, M., 2006, Who said romance was dead? Journal of Material Culture, 11 (1–2), 167–188. doi:10.1177/1359183506063019
  • Fabian, J., 1983. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Gamble, C., 1999. The palaeolithic societies of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gell, A., 1992. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg.
  • Gero, J., 1985, Socio-politics and the woman-at-home ideology. American Antiquity, 50 (2), 342–350. doi:10.2307/280492
  • Gosden, C., 1994. Social being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Gosden, C., 2004. Shaping life in the late prehistoric and Romano-British periods. In: R.M. Rosen, ed. Time and temporality in the ancient world. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 29–44.
  • Harris, O. and Robb, J., 2013. Body worlds and their history: some working concepts. In: J. Robb, ed. The body in history: Europe from the palaeolithic to the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–31.
  • Hicks, D., 2003, Archaeology unfolding: diversity and the loss of isolation. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 22 (3), 315–329. doi:10.1111/ojoa.2003.22.issue-3
  • Hicks, D., 2007, From material culture to material life. Journal of Iberian Archaeology, 9/10, 245–255.
  • Hicks, D., 2010. The material-cultural turn: things as events, things as effects. In: D. Hicks & M.C. Beaudry, eds. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–99.
  • Hicks, D., 2013, Four-field anthropology: charter myths and time warps from St Louis to Oxford. Current Anthropology, 54 (6), 753–763. doi:10.1086/673385
  • Hicks, D. and McAtackney, L., 2007. Landscapes as standpoints. In: D. Hicks, L. McAtackney and G. Fairclough, eds. Envisioning landscape: situations and standpoints in archaeology and heritage. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press (One World Archaeology), 13–29.
  • Hodder, I., 1985, Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 1–26.
  • Hodder, I., 1997. Always momentary, fluid and flexible: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71, 691–700. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00085410
  • Hodder, I., 2004. British prehistory: some thoughts looking in. In: I. Hodder, ed. Archaeology beyond dialogue. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 225–239.
  • Hoskins, W.G., 1955. The making of the english landscape. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  • Ingold, T., 1992, Editorial. Man, 27 (4), 693–696.
  • Ingold, T., 1993, The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25 (2), 152–174. doi:10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
  • Ingold, T., 1994. Introduction to culture. In: T. Ingold, ed. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: Routledge, 329–349.
  • Ingold, T., 1995. Work, time and industry. Time & Society, 4, 5–28. doi:10.1177/0961463X95004001001
  • Ingold, T., 2000. The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.
  • Ingold, T., 2005, Comments on Christopher Tilley: the materiality of stone: explorations in landscape phenomenology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 38 (2), 122–129. doi:10.1080/00293650500359078
  • Ingold, T., 2007a, Comment. Journal of Iberian Archaeology, 9/10, 313–317.
  • Ingold, T., 2007b, Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127
  • Ingold, T., 2010. Drawing together: materials, gestures, lines. In: T. Otto & N. Bubandt, eds. Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, 299–313.
  • Ingold, T., 2011. Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
  • Ingold, T., 2013. Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.
  • Ingold, T., 2014, That’s enough about ethnography! HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4 (1), 383–395. doi:10.14318/hau4.1
  • Jamie, K., 2008, A lone enraptured male. London Review of Books, 30 (5), 25–27.
  • Kolen, J., 2011, A new empiricism. Excavating at the start of the 21st century. Archaeological Dialogues, 18 (1), 30–41. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000080
  • Latour, B., 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
  • Leone, M.P., 2000, Reply to ‘a critical archaeology revisited’. Current Anthropology, 41 (5), 765–766.
  • Leone, M.P., et al., 1987. Toward a critical archaeology [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 28, 283–302. doi:10.1086/203531
  • Lévi-Strauss, C., 1966. Overture to le Cru et le cuit. Yale French Studies, 36/37, 41–65.
  • Lucas, G., 2001a, Destruction and the rhetoric of excavation. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 34 (1), 35–46. doi:10.1080/00293650119347
  • Lucas, G., 2001b. Critical approaches to fieldwork. London: Routledge.
  • Lucas, G., 2010, Time and the archaeological archive. Rethinking History, 14 (3), 343–359. doi:10.1080/13642529.2010.482789
  • Lucas, G., 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lucas, G., 2015, Archaeology and contemporaneity. Archaeological Dialogues, 22 (1), 1–15. doi:10.1017/S1380203815000021
  • Macinnes, L. and Wickham-Jones, C.R., eds., 1992. All natural things: archaeology and the green debate. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  • Malinowski, B., 1922. Argonauts of the western Pacific: Robert Mond expedition to New Guinea, 1914-1918. London: George Routledge and Sons.
  • Massey, D., 2006. Landscape as a provocation: reflections on moving mountains. Journal of Material Culture, 11, 33–48. doi:10.1177/1359183506062991
  • Matless, D., 1998. Landscape and Englishness. London: Reaktion.
  • McTaggart, J., 1908, The unreality of time. Mind, 17 (68), 457–474. doi:10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457
  • Murray, T., 1999. Introduction. In: T. Murray, ed. Time and archaeology. London: Routledge, 1–7.
  • Olivier, L., 2011. The dark abyss of time ( (trans. A. Greenspan)). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
  • Olsen, B., 2010. In defence of things. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
  • Olsen, B., et al., 2012. Archaeology: the discipline of things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Pearson, M., 2010. Site-specific performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Phelan, P., 1993. Unmarked: the politics of performance. London: Routledge.
  • Preucel, R. and Mrozowski, S., eds., 2010. Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. New York: Wiley.
  • Reason, M., 2003, Archive or memory? The detritus of live performance. New Theatre Quarterly, 73, 82–89.
  • Reason, M., 2006. Documentation, disappearance and the representation of live performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Roms, H., 2013. Archiving legacies: who cares for performance remains? In: G. Borggreen & R. Gade, eds. Performing archives/archives of performance. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 35–49.
  • Shanks, M., 2012. The archaeological imagination. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  • Shanks, M. and McGuire, R., 1996, The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity, 61 (1), 75–88.
  • Sherratt, A.G., 1998, Hindsight and foresight: preserving the past for the future. Antiquity, 72, 699–702.
  • Symonds, J., 1999, Toiling in the Vale of Tears: everyday life and resistance in South Uist, Outer Hebrides, 1760-1860. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 3 (2), 101–122. doi:10.1023/A:1021949701139
  • Taylor, W., 1948. A study of archaeology. Menasha, WI: American Anthropological Association (American Anthropological Association Memoir 69).
  • Thomas, J., 1993. Time, culture and identity: an interpretive archaeology. London: Routledge.
  • Thomas, J., 1996. A précis of ‘time, culture and identity’. Archaeological Dialogues, 3, 6–21. doi:10.1017/S1380203800000519
  • Thomas, J., ed., 2000. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
  • Thomas, J., 2001. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: I. Hodder, ed. Archaeological theory today. London: Polity, 165–186.
  • Thomas, J., 2004. Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge.
  • Thornton, R.J., 1985, “Imagine yourself set down…”: Mach, Frazer, Conrad, Malinowski and the role of imagination in ethnography. Anthropology Today, 1 (5), 7–14. doi:10.2307/3032822
  • Tilley, C., 1993. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.
  • Wilkie, L.A. and Bartoy, K.M., 2000, A critical archaeology revisited. Current Anthropology, 41 (5), 747–777. doi:10.1086/317405
  • Wordsworth, W., 1798. Lines written a few miles above Tintern Abbey. In: W. Wordsworth & S.T. Coleridge, ed. Lyrical Ballads, with a few other poems. Bristol: Biggs and Cottle, 201–210.