Decoupling ‘Open’ and ‘Ethical’ Archaeologies: Rethinking Deficits and Expertise for Ethical Public Participation in Archaeology and Heritage

References

• Abu-Khafajah, S., and Miqdadi, R., 2019. Prejudice, military intelligence and neoliberalism: examining the local within archaeology and heritage practices in Jordan. Contemporary Levant, 4 (2), 92–106. doi:10.1080/20581831.2019.1667667
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison, K., 2013. Conservation labour market intelligence. London: Icon, the Institute of Conservation Available from: http://icon.org.uk/system/files/documents/conservation_labour_market_intelligence_2012-13_0.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison, K., and Rocks-Macqueen, D., 2013. Archaeology labour market intelligence: profiling the profession 2012–2013. Landward Research. Available from: http://www.landward.eu/Archaeology%20Labour%20Market%20Intelligence%20Profiling%20the%20Profession%202012-13.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35 (4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts Council England, 2019. Equality, diversity and the creative case: a data report, 2017-2018. Arts Council England. Available from: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/publication/equality-diversity-and-creative-case-data-report-2017-2018 [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Atalay, S., 2012. Community-based archaeology: research with, by and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y., ed., 2016. The participatory city. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., and Howcroft, D., 2014. Amazon mechanical turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29 (3), 213–223. doi:10.1111/ntwe.2014.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G.K., 2014. Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies, 17 (2), 115–121. doi:10.1080/13688790.2014.966414
   Google Scholar
• Boast, R., 2011. Neocolonial collaboration: museum as contact zone revisited. Museum Anthropology, 34 (1), 56–70. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1379.2010.01107.x
   Google Scholar
• BOP Consulting, 2011. Assessment of the social impact of volunteering in HLF-funded projects: year 3. Available from: https://www.heritagefund.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/research/social_impact_volunteering_2011.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1985. The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14 (6), 723–744. doi:10.1007/BF00174048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1990. The logic of practice. R. Nice, Trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J.-C., 1990. Reproduction in education, society and culture. R. Nice, Trans., 2nd ed.. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L., 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Causer, T., and Terras, M., 2014. Many hands make light work. Many hands together make merry work’: transcribe Bentham and crowdsourcing manuscript collections. In: M. Ridge, ed. Crowdsourcing our cultural heritage. Farnham: Ashgate, 58–88.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J.M., and Uphoff, N.T., 1980. Participation’s place in rural development: seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, 8 (3), 213–235. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, C., 2016. Collaborative archaeologies and descendant communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45 (1), 113–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., and Ferguson, T.J., eds., 2008. Collaboration in archaeological practice: engaging descendant communities. Lanham, MD: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K., 2019. EmboDIYing disruption: queer, feminist and inclusive digital archaeologies. European Journal of Archaeology, 22 (3), 398–414. doi:10.1017/eaa.2019.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., 2008a. Democratising engagement. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., 2008b. Unpacking ‘Participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43 (3), 269–283. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Damer, S., and Hague, C., 1971. Public participation in planning: a review. The Town Planning Review, 42 (3), 217–232. doi:10.3828/tpr.42.3.b274nj807658j756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., 2018. Reimagining publics and (non) participation: exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups. Public Understanding of Science, 27 (7), 772–786. doi:10.1177/0963662517750072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., 2019. Equity, exclusion and everyday science learning: the experiences of minoritised groups. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dei, G.J.S., and Asgharzadeh, A., 2001. The power of social theory: the anti-colonial discursive framework. Journal of Educational Thought, 35 (3), 297–323.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, L.M., 2019. Archaeological ethics, video-games, and digital archaeology: a qualitative study on impacts and intersections. Thesis (PhD). University of York.
   Google Scholar
• DeSilvey, C., and Harrison, R., 2019. Anticipating loss: rethinking endangerment in heritage futures. International Journal of Heritage Studies. doi:10.1080/13527258.2019.1644530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, S., and Hedges, M., 2012. Crowd-sourcing scoping study: engaging the crowd with humanities research. London: Centre for e-Research, Department of Digital Humanities King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, K., and Greg, A., 2014. Your paintings tagger: crowdsourcing descriptive metadata for a national virtual collection. In: M. Ridge, ed. Crowdsourcing our cultural heritage. Farnham: Ashgate, 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Ellenberger, K., and Richardson, L.-J., 2018. Reflecting on evaluation in public archaeology. AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 8, 65–94.
   Google Scholar
• English Heritage, 2005. English heritage strategy 2015-2010: making the past part of our future. Swindon: English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and Durant, J., 1995. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4 (1), 57–74. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
   Google Scholar
• Fredheim, H., Macdonald, S., and Morgan, J., 2018. Profusion in museums: a report on contemporary collecting and disposal. Available from: https://heritage-futures.org/profusion-in-museums-report [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Fredheim, L.H., 2018. Endangerment-driven heritage volunteering: democratisation or ‘changeless change’. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24 (6), 619–633. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1399285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlobalXplorer°, n.d.a. Our human story is being lost. Available from: https://www.globalxplorer.org [Accessed 24 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• GlobalXplorer°, n.d.b. GlobalXplorer° is creating A Citizen Archaeology Movement. Available from: https://www.patreon.com/globalxplorer [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Gnecco, C., 2015. An entanglement of sorts: archaeology, ethics, praxis, multiculturalism. In: C. Gnecco and D. Lippert, eds. Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gnecco, C., and Lippert, D., eds., 2015. Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ruibal, A., 2018. Beyond the anthropocene: defining the age of destruction. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 10–21. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber, A., 2016. Decolonizing archaeological thought in South America. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45 (1), 469–485. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095906
   Google Scholar
• Haber, A., and Shepherd, N., eds., 2015. After ethics: ancestral voices and post-disciplinary worlds in archaeology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., 2016. Why is participation inequality important? In: C. Capineri, et al., eds. European handbook of crowdsourced geographic information. London: Ubiquity Press, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, C., 2017. Anthropological archaeology in 2016: cooperation and collaborations in archaeological research and practice. America Anthropologist, 119 (2), 284–297. doi:10.1111/aman.12860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., 2013. Forgetting to remember, remembering to forget: late modern heritage practices, sustainability and the ‘crisis’ of accumulation of the past. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19 (6), 579–595. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.678371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., 2016. World heritage listing and the globalization of the endangerment sensibility. In: F. Vidal and N. Dias, eds. Endangerment, biodiversity and culture. Abingdon: Routledge, 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., 2017. Freezing seeds and making futures: endangerment, hope, security, and time in agrobiodiversity conservation practices. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment: the Journal of Culture and Agriculture, 39 (2), 80–89. doi:10.1111/cuag.2017.39.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, H., and Stirrat, R., 2001. Participation as spiritual duty; empowerment as secular subjection. In: B. Cooke and U. Kothari, eds. Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 168–184.
   Google Scholar
• Historic England, 2018. Heritage and society 2018. Available from: https://historicengland.org.uk/content/heritage-counts/pub/2018/heritage-and-society-2018-pdf [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Hølleland, H., and Skrede, J., 2019. What’s wrong with heritage experts? An interdisciplinary discussion of experts and expertise in heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25 (8), 825–836. doi:10.1080/13527258.2018.1552613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C., 2007. Archaeology is a brand! The meaning of archaeology in contemporary popular culture. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C., and Ortman, O., 2008. Endangerment and conservation ethos in natural and cultural heritage: the case of zoos and archaeological sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14 (1), 74–90. doi:10.1080/13527250701712380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, J., 2006a. The rise of crowdsourcing. WIRED, 14 (6), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J., 2006b. Crowdsourcing: a Definition. Crowdsourcing. Available from: http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, R., and La Salle, M., 2014. Teaching anti-colonial archaeology. Archaeologies, 10 (1), 27–69. doi:10.1007/s11759-014-9250-y
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, T., and Schofield, J., eds., 2015. The ethics of cultural heritage. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., and Wynne, B., 1996. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., 2014. Reflecting on public engagement and science policy. Public Understanding of Science, 23 (1), 27–31. doi:10.1177/0963662513482614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, S., 2017. The museum will not be decolonised. Media Diversified. Available from: https://mediadiversified.org/2017/11/15/the-museum-will-not-be-decolonised/[Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R., 2004. Let’s hear it for humpty: social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends, 13 (2), 41–56. doi:10.1080/0954896042000267143
   Google Scholar
• Liebmann, M., and Rizvi, U.Z., eds., 2008. Archaeology and the postcolonial critique. Lanham, MD: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S.J., 2011. Deficits and dialogues: science communication and the public understanding of science in the UK. In: D.J. Bennett and R.C. Jennings, eds. Successful science communication: telling it like it is. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lorde, A., 1984. Sister outsider: essays and speeches by Audre Lorde. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon, J., and Rizvi, U.Z., eds., 2010. Handbook of postcolonial archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B., 2013. Reflective debate, radical transparency and trust in the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.754631
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B., 2015. Our museum: a five-year perspective from a critical friend. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available from: http://ourmuseum.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/A-five-yearperspective-from-a-critical-friend.pdf [Accessed 6 March 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B., 2017. The gate in the wall: beyond happiness-making in museums. In: B. Onciul, M.L. Stefano, and S. Hawke, eds. Engaging heritage, engaging communities. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B.T., and Alberti, S.J.M.M., 2010. Legacies of prejudice: racism, co-production and radical trust in the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25 (1), 13–35. doi:10.1080/09647770903529061
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., 2002. Behind the scenes at the science museum. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., and Morgan, J., 2018. What not to collect? Post-connoisseurial dystopia and the profusion of things. In: P. Schorch and C. McCarthy, eds. Curatopia: museums and the future of curatorship. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, A., and Okamura, K., 2011. Introduction: new perspectives in global public archaeology. In: K. Okamura and A. Matsuda, eds. New perspectives in global public archaeology. London: Springer, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• May, S., 2009. Then tyger fierce took life away: the contemporary material culture of tigers. In: C. Holtorf and A. Piccini, eds. Contemporary archaeologies: excavating now. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• May, S., 2019. Heritage, endangerment and participation: alternative futures in the Lake District. International Journal of Heritage Studies. doi:10.1080/13527258.2019.1620827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, F.L., 2012. Participatory action research and archaeology. In: R. Skeates, C. McDavid, and J. Carman, eds. The Oxford handbook of public archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0012
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney, K., and Kavanagh, J., eds., 2016. Museum participation: new directions for audience collaboration. Edinburgh: Museums Etc.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, N., ed., 2004. Public archaeology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milek, K., 2018. Transdisciplinary archaeology and the future of archaeological practice: citizen science, portable science, ethical science. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 36–47. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1552312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson Stutz, L., 2018. A future for archaeology: in defence of an intellectually engaged, collaborative and confident archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 48–56. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2018. Ethnicity facts and figures: employment. Available from: https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/work-pay-and-benefits/employment/employment/latest [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Olma, S., 2016. In defence of serendipity: for a radical politics of innovation. London: Repeater.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B.J., 2016. Sámi archaeology, postcolonial theory, and criticism. Fennoscandia Archaeologica, 33, 215–229.
   Google Scholar
• Onciul, B., 2015. Museums, heritage and indigenous voice: decolonising engagement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Onciul, B., 2019. Community engagement, indigenous heritage and the complex figure of the curator: foe facilitator, friend or forsaken? In: P. Schorch and C. McCarthy, eds. Curatopia: museums and the future of curatorship. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S., 2014. Digital media and everyday abuse. Anthropology Now, 6 (1), 81–85. doi:10.1080/19492901.2013.11728421
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S., 2019. The enchantment of the archaeological record. Antiquity, 22 (3), 354–371.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S., and Beale, N., 2015. The social web and archaeology’s restructuring: impact, exploitation, disciplinary change. Open Archaeology, 1 (1), 153–165. doi:10.1515/opar-2015-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, S., Shipley, L., and Osborne, J., 2015. Digital media, power and (in)equality in archaeology and heritage. Internet Archaeology, 38. doi:10.11141/ia.38.4
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., 1995. Participatory learning for sustainably agriculture. World Development, 23 (8), 1247–1263. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, N., 2010. Digital: museum as platform, curator as champion, in the age of social media. Curator: The Museum Journal, 53 (1), 35–43. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2009.00006.x
   Google Scholar
• Pyburn, K.A., 2005. Past pedagogy. Archaeologies, 1 (2), 1–6. doi:10.1007/s11759-005-0015-5
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A., 2007. Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21 (2), 168–178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., 2013. A digital public archaeology? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 23 (1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., 2014. Public archaeology in a digital age. Thesis (PhD). University College London. Available from: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1436367/1/Richardson_Lorna_Jane_Thesis.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., 2017. I’ll give you ‘punk archaeology’, sunshine. World Archaeology, 49 (3), 306–317. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1333036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., 2018. Ethical challenges in digital public archaeology. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1 (1), 64–73. doi:10.5334/jcaa.13
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., and Almansa-Sánchez, J., 2015. Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics. World Archaeology, 47 (2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., and Dixon, J., 2017. Public archaeology 2015: letting public engagement with archaeology ‘speak for itself’. Internet Archaeology, 46. doi:10.11141/ia.46.7
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., and Lindgren, S., 2017. Online tribes and digital authority: what can social theory bring to digital archaeology? Open Archaeology, 3 (1), 139–148. doi:10.1515/opar-2017-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, T., 2014. The limits of a ‘heritage at risk’ framework: the construction of post-disaster cultural heritage in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Social Archaeology, 14 (2), 157–176. doi:10.1177/1469605314527192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, T., 2015. Heritage at risk: the authority and autonomy of a dominant preservation framework. In: K. Lafrenz-Samuels and T. Rico, eds. Heritage keywords: rhetoric and redescription in cultural heritage. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, T., 2016. Constructing destruction: heritage narratives in the Tsunami city. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, T., 2017. Stakeholder in practice: “us”, “them” and the problem of expertise. In: C. Hillerdal, A. Karlström, and C.-J. Ojala, eds. Archaeologies of “us” and “them”: debating the politics of ethnicity and indigeneity in archaeology and heritage discourse. London: Routledge, 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rosol, M., 2016. Community volunteering and the neo-liberal production of urban green space. In: Y. Beebeejaun, ed. The participatory city. Berlin: Jovis, 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E.W., 1995. Orientalism: western conceptions of the orient. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J., ed., 2014. Who needs experts: counter-mapping cultural heritage. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, S., 2009. Putting knowledge in its place: science, colonialism, and the postcolonial. Postcolonial Studies, 12 (4), 373–388. doi:10.1080/13688790903350633
   Google Scholar
• Shackley, M.S., ed., 2011. X-Ray Fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shugar, A.N., and Mass, J.L., eds., 2012. Handheld XRF for art and archaeology. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, N., 2007. Discourse in the Blogosphere: what museums can learn from web 2.0. Museums & Social Issues, 2 (2), 257–274. doi:10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.257
   Google Scholar
• Skarlatidou, A., et al., 2019. User experience of digital technologies in citizen science. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 18 (1). doi:10.22323/2.18010501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speakman, R.J., and Shackley, M.S., 2013. Silo science and portable XRF in archaeology: a response to Frahm. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40 (2), 1435–1443. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeves, P., 2015. Decolonizing the past and present of the western hemisphere (The Americas). Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 11 (1), 42–69. doi:10.1007/s11759-015-9270-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J., 2004. The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., and Gibson, L.K., 2017. Digitisation, digital interaction and social media: embedded barriers to democratic heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23 (5), 408–420. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1171245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R.M., 2004. Archaeology and authority in the twenty-first century. In: N. Merriman, ed. Public archaeology. London: Routledge, 191–201.
   Google Scholar
• Thurley, S., 2005. Into the future: our strategy for 2005–2010. Conservation Bulletin, 49, 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and Yang, K.W., 2012. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 1 (1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, F., and Dias, N., eds., 2016. Endangerment, biodiversity and culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., 2015. Heritage and community engagement. In: T. Ireland and J. Schofield, eds. The ethics of cultural heritage. New York: Springer, 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and Smith, L., eds., 2009. Taking archaeology out of heritage. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, S., and Waterton, E., 2010. Heritage and community engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16 (1–2), 1–3. doi:10.1080/13527250903441655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S.C., 1996. Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6 (1), 6–15. doi:10.1080/0961452961000157564
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B., 1991. Knowledges in context. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16 (1), 111–121. doi:10.1177/016224399101600108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B., 1995. Public understanding of science. In: S. Jasanoff, et al., eds. Handbook of science and technology studies. London: Sage, 457–479.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, N., 1996. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and the public uptake of science. In: A. Irwin and B. Wynne, eds. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, D., 2018. Crowdsourcing antiquities crime fighting: a review of GlobalXplorer°. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6 (2), 173–178. doi:10.1017/aap.2018.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, J., 1991. Public understanding of science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15 (1), 99–105. doi:10.1177/016224399101600106
   Google Scholar