I’ll Tell You What I Want, What I Really, Really Want! Open Archaeology that Is Collaborative, Participatory, Public, and Feminist

REFERENCES

• Agbe-Davies, A.S., 2010. Concepts of community in the pursuit of an inclusive archaeology. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16 (6), 373–389. doi:10.1080/13527258.2010.510923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti, B., 2016. Archaeologies of ontology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45 (1), 163–179. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcoff, L.M., 2006. Visible Identities: race, gender, and the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., 1983. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Angelbeck, B., and Grier, C., 2012. Anarchism and the archaeology of anarchic societies: resistance to centralisation in the coast Salish Region of the Northwest coast. Current Anthropology, 53 (5), 547–587. doi:10.1086/667621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay, S., 2010. ‘We don’t talk about Çatalhöyük, we live it’: sustainable archaeological practice through community-based participatory research. World Archaeology, 42 (3), 418–429. doi:10.1080/00438243.2010.497394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay, S., 2012. Community-based archaeology: research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J.C., 1988. Fields of discourse: reconstituting a social archaeology. Critique of Anthropology, 7 (3), 5–16. doi:10.1177/0308275X8800700301
   Google Scholar
• Battle-Baptiste, W., 2016 [2011]. Black feminist archaeology. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, Z., 2001. Community: seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernbeck, R., and Pollock, S., 2018. Archaeology’s people. Antiquity, 92 (362), 516–517. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, C., 2011. How to queer the past without sex: queer theory, feminisms, and the archaeology of identity. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 7 (1), 75–96. doi:10.1007/s11759-011-9157-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borck, L., and Sanger, M.C., 2017. An introduction to anarchism in archaeology. The Society of American Archaeology Archaeological Record, 17 (1), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Buchli, V., 2007. Opinion. Conservation Bulletin, 56, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Carraher, W., 2019. Slow archaeology, punk archaeology, and the ‘archaeology of care’. European Journal of Archaeology, 22 (3), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipolla, C.N., and Quinn, J., 2016. Field school archaeology the Mohegan Way: reflections on twenty years of community-based research and teaching. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 3 (2), 118–134. doi:10.1080/20518196.2016.1154734
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., 1997. Routes: travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, C., 2016. Collaborative archaeologies and descendant communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45 (1), 113–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., and Ferguson, T.J., 2004. Virtue ethics and the practice of history: native Americans and archaeologists along the San Pedro Valley of Arizona. Journal of Social Archaeology, 4 (1), 5–27. doi:10.1177/1469605304039848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conkey, M., and Spector, J., 1984. Archaeology and the study of gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Crea, G., et al. 2014. Turbo Island, Bristol: excavating a contemporary homeless place. Post-medieval Archaeology, 48 (1), 133–150. doi:10.1179/0079423614Z.00000000050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creed, G.W., 2006. Reconsidering community. In: G.W. Creed ed. Seductions of community: emancipations, oppressions, quandaries. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Crooke, E., 2010. The politics of community heritage: motivations, authority, and control. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16 (1–2), 16–29. doi:10.1080/13527250903441705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dézsi, A., and Wurst, L., 2020. Theorizing capitalism’s cracks. Paper presented at the Society of Historical Archaeology conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Andreu, M., and Ruiz, A., 2017. Interacting with heritage: social inclusion and archaeology in Barcelona. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 4 (1), 53–68. doi:10.1080/20518196.2017.1230312
   Google Scholar
• Dicker, R., and Piepmeier, A., 2003. Catching a wave: reclaiming feminism for the 21st century. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domanska, E., 2018. Is this stone alive? Prefiguring the future role of archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 22–35. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1553060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddisford, D., and Morgan, C., 2017. Single context archaeology as anarchist praxis. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 5 (2), 117–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigi, J., 2015. On the social nature of objectivity: helen Longino and Justin Biddle. Theoria, 30 (3), 449–463. doi:10.1387/theoria.13208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelstad, E., 1991. Images of power and contradiction: feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity, 65 (248), 502–514. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00080108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelstad, E., 2007. Much more than gender. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14 (3), 217–234. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9035-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanders, L., 2013. At Thatcher’s funeral, Bury TINA Too [Online]. Available from: https://www.thenation.com/article/thatchers-funeral-bury-tina-too/ [Accessed August 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., 2016. Relational personhood revisited. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26 (3), 397–412. doi:10.1017/S0959774316000172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowles, S., 2010. A people’s history of the American Southwest. In: S. Alt, ed. Ancient complexities: new perspectives in Pre-Columbian North America. Provo: University of Utah, 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles, S., 2016. The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies). Journal of Material Culture, 21 (1), 9–27. doi:10.1177/1359183515623818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M., 2001. A Black-feminist inspired archaeology? Journal of Social Archaeology, 1 (1), 108–125. doi:10.1177/146960530100100108
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, J.M., and Plog, F.T., 1970. The nature of archaeological explanation. American Antiquity, 35 (4), 405–412. doi:10.2307/278113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, S., 2006. Postfeminism. In: S. Gamble, ed. The Routledge guide to feminism and postfeminism. London: Routledge, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J., 2007. Honouring ambiguity/problematizing certitude. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14 (3), 311–327. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9037-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R., 2003. Power and the production of subjects: a genealogy of the New Man and the New Lad. The Sociological Review, 51 (1_suppl), 34–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2003.tb03602.x
   Google Scholar
• González-Ruibal, A., 2018a. Beyond the Anthropocene: defining the age of destruction. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 10–21. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ruibal, A., 2018b. Welcome conflict. Archaeology and the return of the political. Barcelona: Keynote lecture given at EAA.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ruibal, A., Alonzo González, P., and Criado-Boado, F., 2018. Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity, 92 (362), 507–515. doi:10.15184/aqy.2017.227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, D., 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, S., 2014. The Janus view: reflections, relationships and a community-based approach to indigenous archaeology and heritage in Northern Australia. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 1 (1), 56–68. doi:10.1179/2051819613Z.0000000002
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, D.R., and Hogg, E.A., 2015. Towards an evaluation-based framework of collaborative archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3 (2), 107–123. doi:10.7183/2326-3768.3.2.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, C.T., 2017. The year in review: anthropological archaeology in 2016: cooperation and collaborations in archaeological research and practice. American Anthropologist, 119 (2), 284–297. doi:10.1111/aman.12860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilakis, Y., 2018. Decolonial archaeology as social justice. Antiquity, 92 (362), 518–520. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S., 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hays-Gilpin, K., 2000. Feminist scholarship in archaeology. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571 (1), 89–106. doi:10.1177/000271620057100107
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C., 2007. Archaeology is a brand! The meaning of archaeology in contemporary popular culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ion, A., 2017. How interdisciplinary is interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the impact of aDNA research for the archaeology of human remains. Current Swedish Archaeology, 25, 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Isherwood, R., 2009. Community archaeology: a study of the conceptual, political and practical issues surrounding community archaeology in the United Kingdom today. Unpublished (PhD thesis). University of Manchester, UK. [Online] Available from: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.498943 [Accessed 3 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, S., 2015. Challenging heritage visualisation: beauty, aura and democratisation. Open Archaeology, 1 (1), 144–152. doi:10.1515/opar-2015-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiddey, R., 2014. Homeless heritage: collaborative social archaeology as therapeutic practice [Online]. Available from: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/6262/ [Accessed 4 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Kiddey, R., 2017a. Homeless heritage: social archaeology as therapeutic practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiddey, R., 2017b. From the ground up: cultural heritage practices as tools for empowerment in the homeless heritage project. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24 (7), 694–708. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1274669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiddey, R., 2019. Reluctant refugee: an activist archaeological approach to alternative refugee shelter in Athens (Greece). Journal of Refugee Studies, fey061. doi:10.1093/jrs/fey061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiddey, R., Murrani, S., and Bellinger, A., forthcoming. Different ways of doing: reflections on a knowledge exchange fellowship. Journal of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, R., 2014. Nunalleq: rescuing an Eskimo village from the sea. British Archaeology, 136, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, J., 2016. Pioneer villages in Ontario, Canada: communities of heritage. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 3 (3), 165–182. doi:10.1080/20518196.2016.1201259
   Google Scholar
• Lidén, K., and Eriksson, G., 2013. Archaeology vs. archaeological science: do we have a case? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Little, B.J., and Zimmerman, L.J., 2010. In the public interest: creating a more activist, civically engaged archaeology. In: W. Ashmore, D. Lippert, and B. Mills, eds. Voices in American archaeology. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, 131–159.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H.E., 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lønna, E., 2004. Waves in the history of feminism. In: H.R. Christiansen, B. Halsaa, and A. Saarinen, eds. Crossing borders: re-mapping women’s movements at the turn of the 21st century. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Y., Roseneil, S., and Armstrong, K., 2009. Situating the Greenham archaeology: an autoethnography of a feminist project. Public Archaeology, 8 (2–3), 225–245. doi:10.1179/175355309X457240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGimsey, C.R., 1972. Public archaeology. New York: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, R.H., 2008. Archaeology as political action. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B.K., 2015. Promoting a more interactive public archaeology: archaeological visualization and reflexivity through virtual artifact curation. Advances in Archaeological, 3 (3), 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Milek, K., 2018. Transdisciplinary archaeology and the future of archaeological practice: citizen science, portable science, ethical science. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 36–47. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1552312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokoena, N., 2017. Community involvement and heritage management in rural South Africa. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 4 (3), 189–202. doi:10.1080/20518196.2017.1357233
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W., 2016. The rise of cheap nature. In: J.W. Moore, ed. Anthropocene or capitalocene? Oakland: PM Press, 78–115.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, E., and Sahasranaman, V., 2018. Reclaim, resist, reframe: reimagining the feminist movement in the 2010s. Gender & Development, 26 (3), 403–421. doi:10.1080/13552074.2018.1523275
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., 2015. Punk, DIY, and anarchy in archaeological thought and practice. Arqueologia Publica: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 5, 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., 2019. Avatars, monsters, and machines: a cyborg archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology, 22 (3), 324–337. doi:10.1017/eaa.2019.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson Stutz, L., 2018. A future for archaeology: in defense of an intellectually engaged, collaborative, and confident archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 48–56. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noddings, N., 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pétursdóttir, Þ., 2017. Climate change? Archaeology and anthropocene. Archaeological Dialogues, 24 (2), 175–205. doi:10.1017/S1380203817000216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccini, A., 2007. A survey of heritage television viewing figures [Online]. Available from: http://britarch.ac.uk/sites/www.britarch.ac.uk/files/node-files/research_bulletin_number_1_final.pdf [Accessed November 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Pyburn, A.K., 2011. Engaged archaeology: whose community? Which public? In: K. Okamura and A. Matsuda, eds. New perspectives in global public archaeology. New York: Springer, 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pyburn, K.A., 2009. Practising archaeology - as if it really matters. Public Archaeology, 8 (2–3), 161–175. doi:10.1179/175355309X457204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L.-J., and Almansa-Sánchez, J., 2015. Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics. World Archaeology, 47 (2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryzewski, K., and Cherry, J.F., 2012. Communities and archaeology under the Soufrière Hill Volcano on Montserrat. Journal of Field Archaeology, 37 (4), 316–327. doi:10.1179/0093469012Z.00000000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadla-Hall, T., 1999. Editorial: public archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology, 2 (2), 147–158. doi:10.1179/eja.1999.2.2.147
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P.R., 2017. Contests between heritage and history in Tanganyika/Tanzania: insights arising from community-based heritage research. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4 (2), 85–100. doi:10.1080/20518196.2017.1308300
   Google Scholar
• Shackel, P.A., 2007. Civic engagement and social justice: race on the Illinois frontier. In: B.J. Little and P.A. Shackel, eds. Archaeology as a tool of civic engagement. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press, 243–262.
   Google Scholar
• Skeates, R., McDavid, C., and Carman, J., 2012. The Oxford handbook of public archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M.L., 2000. Gender archaeology. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, T.F., 2017. The two cultures and a world apart: archaeology and science at a new cross-roads. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 50 (2), 101–115. doi:10.1080/00293652.2017.1367031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., 2016a. Migrant memento mori and the geography of risk. Journal of Social Archaeology, 16 (3), 335–358. doi:10.1177/1469605316673171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., 2016b. Place making in non-places: migrant graffiti in rural Hhghway box culverts. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 3 (2), 121–294. doi:10.1558/jca.31830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G.C., 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In: Cary Nelson, ed. Marxism and the interpretation of culture. London: Macmillan, 66–111.
   Google Scholar
• Stottman, M.J., 2010. Archaeologists as activists: can archaeologists change the world? Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supernant, K., and Warrick, G., 2014. Challenges to critical community-based archaeological practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 38 (2), 563–591.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., and Gison, L.K., 2016. Digitisation, digital interaction, and social media: embedded barriers to democratic heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 5 (1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., 2014. Making archaeological heritage accessible in Great Britain: enter community archaeology. In: S. Thomas and J. Lea, eds. Public participation in archaeology. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Trigger, B., 2006. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, B., 2016. Towards a transpacific archaeology of the modern world. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 20 (1), 146–174. doi:10.1007/s10761-015-0321-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO, 2013. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence [Online]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241564625/en/[Accessed August 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, A., 2007. Doing archaeology as a feminist: introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14 (3), 209–216. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, A., 2019. Crossing a threshold: collaborative archaeology in global dialogue. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 15 (3), 570–587. doi:10.1007/s11759-019-09385-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, L., 2018. Changing archaeology’s ‘brand’ would be helpful. Antiquity, 92 (362), 523–524. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, L.J., 1989. Made radical by my own: an archaeologist learns to accept reburial. In: R. Layton, ed. Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions. London: Unwin Hyman, 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, L.J., Singleton, C., and Welch, J., 2010. Activism and creating a translational archaeology of homelessness. World Archaeology, 42 (3), 443–454. doi:10.1080/00438243.2010.497400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar