638
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Indigenous Archaeology in a Settler-Colonist State: A View from the North American Southwest

REFERENCES

  • Adams, E.C., 2018. The Homol’ovi research program: enriching Hopi history through collaboration. In: L.J. Kuwanwisiwma, T.J. Ferguson, and C. Colwell, eds. Footprints of Hopi history: hopihiniwtiput kukveni’at. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 90–103.
  • Adler, M.A., and Bruning, S.B., 2008. Navigating the fluidity of social identity: collaborative research into cultural affiliation in the American Southwest. In: C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh and T.J. Ferguson, eds. Collaboration in archaeological practice: engaging descendant communities. Lanham, Maryland: Altamira Press, 35–54.
  • Aguilar, J.R. 2019. Asserting sovereignty: an indigenous archaeology of the Pueblo revolt period at Tunyo, San Ildefonso Pueblo, New Mexico. PhD dissertation, Proquest LLC, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Ann Arbor.
  • Anschuetz, K.F. 2007. The Valles Caldera national preserve as a multi-layered ethnographic landscape. In: K.F. Anschuetz and T. Merlan, eds., More than a scenic mountain landscape: Valles Caldera National Preserve land use history. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-196. Fort Collins, Colorado: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 129–162. Available from: http://www.treesearch. fs.fed.us/pubs/28337
  • Anschuetz, K.F., and Dongoske, K.E. 2017. Hadiya:Wa:hearing what traditional Pueblo cultural advisors talk about. Paper presented in the symposium: Collaborative and community archaeology, C. Bello and H. Higgins, eds. orgs., 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, April 2, 2017. Vancouver.
  • Anyon, R., and Ferguson, T.J., 1995. Cultural resources management at the Pueblo of Zuni, New Mexico, USA. Antiquity, 69, 913–930. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00082466
  • Anyon, R., Ferguson, T.J., and Welch, J.R., 2000. Heritage management by American Indian tribes in the Southwestern United States. In: F. McManamon and A. Hatton, eds. Cultural resource management in contemporary society: perspectives on managing and presenting the past. London: Routledge, 120–141.
  • Atalay, S., 2006. Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. American Indian Quarterly, 30 (3&4), 289–310. doi:10.1353/aiq.2006.0015.
  • Atalay, S., 2012. Community-based archaeology: research with, by, and for Indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Balter, M. 2017. Viewpoint: the ethical battle over ancient DNA. Sapiens. Available from: https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/chaco-canyon-nagpra/ [Accessed 30 Mar 2017].
  • Begay, R.M., 1997. The role of archaeology on Indian lands: the Navajo Nation. In: N. Swidler, et al., eds.. Native Americans and archaeologists; stepping stones to common ground. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press, 161–171.
  • Bernardini, W., 2005. Hopi oral tradition and the archaeology of identity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Bernardini, W., et al., 2013. Quantifying visual prominence in social landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 3946–3954. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.019.
  • Bruchac, M., Hart, S., and Wobst, H.M., eds, 2016. Indigenous archaeologies: a reader on decolonization. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Bureau of Indian Affairs, 2020. Indian entities recognized by and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian affairs. Federal Register: the Daily Journal of the United States Government. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/30/2020-01707/indian-entities-recognized-by-and-eligible-to-receive-services-from-the-united-states-bureau-of. [Accessed 20 Mar 2020].
  • Cameron, C.M., 2013. How people moved among ancient societies: broadening the view. American Anthropologist, 115, 218–231. doi:10.1111/aman.12005
  • Campbell, W., 2019. Nat’ááh Nahane’ Bina’ji O’hoo’ah: diné Archaeologists and Navajo Archaeology in the 21st Century. Session organized for the 84th Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, April 2019. Albuquerque, NM.
  • Colwell, C., 2016. Collaborative archaeologies and descendant communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 113–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937
  • Colwell, C., 2017. Plundered skulls and stolen spirits: inside the fight to reclaim native America’s culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., et al., 2010. The premise and promise of Indigenous archaeology. American Antiquity, 75 (2), 228–238. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.228.
  • Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., and Ferguson, T.J., eds, 2008. Collaboration in archaeological practice: engaging descendant communities. Lanham, Maryland: Altamira Press.
  • Cordell, L.S., and Kintigh, K.W., 2010. Reply to Schillaci and Bustard. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 33 (2), 378–383. doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2010.01120.x.
  • DeLoria, V., Jr., 1969. Custer died for your sins: an Indian manifesto. New York: Macmillan.
  • DeLoria, V., Jr., 1992. Indians, archaeologists, and the future. American Antiquity, 57, 595–598. doi:10.2307/280822
  • DeLoria, V., Jr., and Lytle, C.M., 1984. The nations within: the past and future of American Indian sovereignty. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Domanska, E., 2018. Is this stone alive: prefiguring the future role of archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 22–35. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1553060.
  • Dongoske, K.E., et al., 1997. Archaeological cultures and cultural affiliation: hopi and Zuni perspectives in the American Southwest. American Antiquity, 62 (4), 600–608. doi:10.2307/281880.
  • Dongoske, K.E., Aldenderfer, M., and Doehner, K., eds, 2000. Working together: native Americans and archaeologists. Washington, D.C.: Society for American Archaeology.
  • Echo-Hawk, R., 1986. Museum rights vs. Indian rights: guidelines for assessing competing legal interests in Native cultural resources. NYU Review of Law and Social Change, 14, 437–453.
  • Ferguson, T.J., 1996. Native Americans and the practice of archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 63–79. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.63
  • Ferguson, T.J., and Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., 2006. History is in the land: multivocal tribal traditions in Arizona’s San Pedro valley. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Ferguson, T.J., Koyiyumptewa, S.B., and Hopkins, M.P., 2015. Co-creation of knowledge by the Hopi Tribe and archaeologists. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3 (3), 249–262. doi:10.7183/2326-3768.3.3.249.
  • Fine-Dare, K.S., 2002. Grave injustice: the American Indian repatriation movement and NAGPRA. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Finn, C., 1997. Leaving more than footprints’: modern votive offerings at Chaco Canyon prehistoric site. Antiquity, 71, 169–178. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00084659
  • Fowler, D.D., 2010. A laboratory of anthropology: science and romanticism in the American Southwest, 1846-1930. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  • Fowles, S., 2010. The Southwest school of landscape archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 453–468. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105107
  • González-Ruibal, A., González, P.A., and Criado-Boado, F., 2018. Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity, 92 (362), 507–515. 525-527. doi:10.15184/aqy.2017.227.
  • Halperin, C.T., 2017. Anthropological archaeology in 2016: cooperation and collaborations in archaeological research and practice. American Anthropologist, 119 (2), 284–297. doi:10.1111/aman.12860.
  • Hays-Gilpin, K., and Gilpin, D., 2018. Becoming Hopi: exploring Hopi ethnogenesis through architecture, pottery, and cultural Knowledge. In: L.J. Kuwanwisiwma, T.J. Ferguson, and C. Colwell, eds. Footprints of hopi history: Hopihiniwtiput Kukveni’at. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 123–140.
  • Healy, J. 2016. North Dakota oil pipeline battle: who’s fighting and why. The New York Times, 26 August 2016. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/02/us/north-dakota-oil-pipeline-battle-whos-fighting-and-why.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer, [Accessed 20 March 2020].
  • Kennett, D.J., et al., 2017. Archaeogenomic evidence reveals prehistoric matrilineal dynasty. Nature Communications, 8, 14115. doi:10.1038/ncomms14115.
  • Kintigh, K.W., et al., 2014. Grand challenges for archaeology. American Antiquity, 79 (1), 5–24. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.5.
  • Klesert, A.L., and Downer, A.S., eds, 1990. Preservation on the reservation: native Americans, Native American lands, and archaeology. Window Rock, Arizona: Navajo Nation Archaeology Department and Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department.
  • Kuwanwisiwma, L.J., Ferguson, T.J., and Colwell, C., eds, 2018. Footprints of Hopi history: hopihiniwtiput kukveni’at. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • La Salle, M.J., 2010. Community collaboration and other good intentions. Archaeologies, 6, 401–422. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9150-8
  • Laluk, N., 2017. The indivisibility of land and mind: indigenous knowledge and collaborative archaeology within Apache contexts. Journal of Social Archaeology, 17 (1), 92–112. doi:10.1177/1469605317690082.
  • Liebmann, M., 2008. Postcolonial cultural affiliation: essentialism, hybridity, and NAGPRA. In: M. Liebmann and U. Rizvi, eds.. Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press, 73–90.
  • Liebmann, M., 2012. Revolt: an archaeological history of Pueblo resistance and revitalization in 17th century New Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Lyons, P., 2003. Ancestral Hopi migrations. Anthropological papers 68. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Marek-Martinez, O.V. 2017. Archaeology for, by, and with the Navajo people - The Nihookáá Dine’é’ Bila’ Ashdla’ii Way. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California – Berkeley, Proquest LLC, Ann Arbor.
  • McAnany, P.A., and Rowe, S.M., 2015. Re-visiting the field: collaborative archaeology as a paradigm shift. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40, 499–507. doi:10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000007
  • McGhee, R., 2010. Of strawmen, herrings, and frustrated expectations. American Antiquity, 75 (2), 229–243. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.239.
  • McGuire, R.H., 1992. Archaeology and the first Americans. American Anthropologist, 94 (4), 816–836. doi:10.1525/aa.1992.94.4.02a00030.
  • McGuire, R.H., 2008. Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • McManamon, F.P., 1991. The many publics for archaeology. American Antiquity, 56, 121–130. doi:10.1017/S0002731600067299
  • Milek, K., 2018. Transdisciplinary archaeology and the future of archaeological practice: citizen science, portable science, ethical science. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 36–47. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1552312.
  • Ortman, S.G., 2012. Winds from the north: tewa origins and historical anthropology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  • Ray, C., 2009. Emerging consensus and concerns in collaborative archaeological research. Collaborative Anthropology, 2, 1–8. doi:10.1353/cla.0.0020
  • Reardon, J., and TallBear, K., 2012. “Your DNA is our history”: genomics, anthropology, and the construction of whiteness as property. Current Anthropology, 53 (S5), S233–S245. doi:10.1086/662629.
  • Reich, D., 2018. Who we are and how we got here: ancient DNA and the new science of the human past. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Schachner, G., 2018. Forging new intellectual geneaologies in Southwest archaeology. In: L.J. Kuwanwisiwma, T.J. Ferguson, and C. Colwell, eds.. Footprints of hopi history: hopihiniwtiput Kukveni’at. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 214–229.
  • Schillaci, M.A., and Bustard, W.J., 2010. Controversy and conflict: NAGPRA and the role of biological anthropology in determinating cultural affiliation. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 33 (2), 352–373. doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2010.01118.x.
  • Silliman, S.W., ed, 2008. Collaborating at the trowel’s edge: teaching and learning in Indigenous archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Silverberg, R., 1968. Mound builders of ancient America: the archaeology of a myth. New York: New York Graphic Society Ltd.
  • Smith, C., and Wobst, H.M., eds, 2005. Indigenous archaeologies: decolonizing theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Stutz, L.N., 2018. A future for archaeology: in defense of an intellectually engaged, collaborative and confident archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 48–56. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544168.
  • Swidler, N., et al., eds, 1997. Native Americans and archaeologists: stepping stones to common ground. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press.
  • TallBear, K., 2013. Native American DNA: tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science. St. Paul, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Thompson, K.F., 2011. The Navajo Nation, Diné archaeologists, Diné archaeology, and Diné communities. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 7 (3), 502–517. doi:10.1007/s11759-011-9183-7.
  • Tringham, R., 2018. A plea for a richer, fuller, and more complex future archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 57–63. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1547920.
  • Tsosie, R., 2007. Cultural challenges to biotechnology: native American genetic resources and the concept of cultural harm. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 35 (3), 396–411. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00163.x.
  • Two Bears, D., 2006. Navajo archaeologist is not an oxymoron: a Tribal archaeologist’s experience. American Indian Quarterly, 30, 381–387. doi:10.1353/aiq.2006.0033
  • Two Bears, D. 2019. Shimásání dóó shicheii bi’ólta’ - My grandmother’s and grandfather’s school: the old leupp boarding school, a historic archaeological site on the navajo reservation. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Proquest LLC. Ann Arbor.
  • United States Census Bureau, 2010. Available from: https://www.census.gov/en.html. [Accessed 1 Sept 2019].
  • Van Dyke, R.M., 2007. The Chaco experience: landscape and ideology at the center place. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.
  • Van Dyke, R.M., 2017. Chaco Canyon: a contested memory anchor in the. In: N.A. Southwest, et al., eds.. Berlin studies of the ancient world 45, Edition Topoi. Berlin: Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 199–226.
  • Van Dyke, R.M., and Heitman, C.C., eds, 2020. The Greater Chaco landscape: ancestors, scholarship, and advocacy. Boulder: University Press of Colorado. Available from: http://read.upcolorado.com/projects/the-greater-chaco-landscape. [Accessed 26 Jun 2020]
  • Veracini, L., 2010. Settler colonialism: a theoretical overview. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Washburn, W., 1995 (1971). Red man’s land, white man’s law. 2nd ed. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Watkins, J.E., 2000. Indigenous archaeology: american Indian values and scientific practice. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press.
  • Watkins, J.E., 2003. Beyond the margin: american Indians, First Nations, and archaeology in North America. American Antiquity, 68, 273–285. doi:10.2307/3557080
  • Welch, J.R., 2000. The White Mountain Apache tribe heritage program: origins, operations, and challenges. In: K.E. Dongoske, M. Aldenderfer, and K. Doehner, eds. Working together: native Americans and archaeologists. Washinton, D.C.: Society for American Archaeology, 67–83.
  • Welch, J.R., ed, 2016. Dispatches from the fort apache scout: white mountain and Cibecue apache history through 1881. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. by Lori Davisson, Edger Perry, and the Original Staff of the White Mountain Apache Cultural Center.
  • Wilcox, M., 2009. The Pueblo revolt and the mythology of conquest: an indigenous archaeology of contact. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Zimmerman, L., 1986. ‘Tell them about the suicide’: a review of recent materials on the reburial of prehistoric Native American skeletons. American Indian Quarterly, 10, 333–343. doi:10.2307/1183841

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.