148
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

An Overlooked Frontier? Scenes from Development-led Archaeology Today

REFERENCES

  • Aitchison, K., 2009. After the ‘gold rush’: global archaeology in 2009. World Archaeology, 41 (4), 659–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903363772
  • Andersson, C., Lagerlöf, A., and Skyllberg, E., 2010. Assessing and measuring: on quality in development-led archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 18 (1), 11–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2010.01
  • Barreiro, D., Pousa, R.V., and Dans, E.P., 2018. Malta beyond Malta: the confluence between preventive and public archaeology as a new horizon. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 28, 149–173.
  • Beck, A.S., 2019. Arkæologisk viden på spil. Gefjon, 4, 201–215.
  • Beck, A.S., 2021. De lovpligtige udgravninger og begrebet ny viden. Arkæologisk Forum, 44, 18–25.
  • Beck, A.S., in press. Hvor arkæologisk viden bliver til. En undersøgelse af rammerne for vidensproduktion i kapitel 8-arkæologien. Vordingborg: Museum Southeastdenmark, Research report No. KNV 880.
  • Edgeworth, M., 2012. Follow the cut, follow the rhythm, follow the material. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 45 (1), 76–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2012.669995
  • European Council, 1992. European convention on the protection of the archaeological heritage, European Treaty Series No. 143.
  • Everill, P., 2012. The invisible diggers. A study of British commercial archaeology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  • ICOMOS, 1990. Charter for the protection and management of the archaeological heritage.
  • Knoop, R., et al., 2021. Brave new worlds. Foreign inspirations for Dutch archaeological heritage management. Amsterdam: Gordion.
  • Linden, M.V., et al. 2012. Introduction: development-led archaeology in northwest Europe Frameworks, practices and outcomes. In: M.V. Linden, ed. Development-led archaeology in Northwest Europe, proceedings of a round table at the University of Leicester, 19th-21st November 2009. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1–8.
  • Marila, M., 2017. Vagueness and archaeological interpretation: a sensuous approach to archaeological knowledge formation through finds analysis. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 50 (1), 66–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393
  • Milek, K., 2018. Transdisciplinary archaeology and the future of archaeological practice: citizen science, portable science, ethical science. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 36–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2018.1552312
  • Sørensen, T.F., 2018. The triviality of the new. Innovation and impact in archaeology and beyond. Current Swedish Archaeology, 26 (1), 93–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2018.09
  • Statsrevisorerne, 2018. Rigsrevisionens beretning om arkæologiske undersøgelser afgivet til Folketinget med Statsrevisorernes bemærkninger. Copenhagen: Statsrevisorerne, Report No. 14/2017.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.