The Baby in the Brick: A More-Than-Representational Approach to Architectural Action and Intramural Burial at Çatalhöyük

REFERENCES

• Adams, R.L., and King, S.M., 2010. Residential burial in global perspective. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 20 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2011.01024.x
   Google Scholar
• Alberti, B., 2016. Archaeologies of ontology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45 (1), 163–179. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti, B., and Marshall, Y., 2009. Animating archaeology: local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19 (3), 344–356. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti, B., and Marshall, Y., 2014. A matter of difference: Karen Barad, ontology and archaeological bodies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 24 (1), 19–36. doi:10.1017/S0959774314000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and Harrison, P., eds., 2010. Taking-place: non-representational theories and geography. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arponen, V.P.J., and Ribeiro, A., 2014. Understanding rituals: a critique of representationalism. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47 (2), 161–179. doi:10.1080/00293652.2014.938107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., and McFadyen, L., 2010. Built objects. In: D. Hicks and M.C. Beaudry, eds. The oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 562–587.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, D., Fairbairn, A., and Martin, L., 2017. The animate house, the institutionalization of the household in Neolithic central Anatolia. World Archaeology, 49 (5), 753–776. doi:10.1080/00438243.2016.1215259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K., 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barański, M.Z., et al., 2015. The architecture of Neolithic Çatalhöyük as a process. In: I. Hodder and A. Marciniak, eds. Assembling Çatalhöyük. Leeds: European Association of Archaeologists, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Barański, M.Z., et al., 2022. Continuity and change in architectural traditions at late Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In: I. Hodder and C. Tsoraki, eds. Communities at work: the making of Çatalhöyük. London: British Institute at Ankara, 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Boivin, N., 2000. Life rhythms and floor sequences: excavating time in rural Rajasthan and Neolithic Catalhoyuk. World Archaeology, 31 (3), 367–388. doi:10.1080/00438240009696927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borić, D., 2013. Theater of predation: beneath the skin of Göbekli Tepe images. In: C. Watts, ed. Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things. London: Routledge, 42–64.
   Google Scholar
• Brereton, G., 2013. Cultures of infancy and capital accumulation in pre-urban mesopotamia. World Archaeology, 45 (2), 232–251. doi:10.1080/00438243.2013.799042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, T., et al., 2015. Laying the Foundations: creating households at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In: I. Hodder and A. Marciniak, eds. Assembling Çatalhöyük. Leeds: European Association of Archaeologists, 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Cessford, C., 2005. Absolute dating at Çatalhöyük. In: I. Hodder, ed. Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 65–99.
   Google Scholar
• Çevik, Ö., 2019. Changing ideologies in community-making through the Neolithic period at Ulucak. In: A. Marciniak, ed. Concluding the Neolithic: the near east in the second half of the seventh millennium BCE. Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 219–240.
   Google Scholar
• Chyleński, M., et al., 2019. Ancient mitochondrial genomes reveal the absence of maternal kinship in the burials of Çatalhöyük people and their genetic affinities. Genes, 10 (3), 207. doi:10.3390/genes10030207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crellin, R.J., 2020. Change and Archaeology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crellin, R.J., et al., 2021. Archaeological theory in dialogue: situating relationality, ontology, posthumanism, and indigenous paradigms. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M., 2006. A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Doel, M.A., 2010. Representation and difference. In: B. Anderson and P. Harrison, eds. Taking-Place: non-Representational theories and geography. London: Routledge, 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, C., 2020. The clay world of Çatalhöyük: a fine-grained perspective. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Düring, B.S., 2006. Constructing communities : clustered neighbourhood settlements of the Central Anatolian Neolithic ca. 8500-5500 Cal. BC. Thesis (PhD). Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M.H., 2017. Don’t all mothers love their children? Deposited infants as animate objects in the Scandinavian iron age. World Archaeology, 49 (3), 338–356. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1340189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M.H., 2020. ‘Body-objects’ and personhood in the Iron and Viking Ages: processing, curating, and depositing skulls in domestic space. World Archaeology, 52 (1), 103–119. doi:10.1080/00438243.2019.1741439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M.H., and Kay, K., 2022. Reflections on posthuman ethics. Grievability and the more-than-human worlds of Iron and Viking Age Scandinavia. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 32 (2), 331–343. doi:10.1017/S0959774321000561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esin, U., et al., 1991. Salvage excavations at the pre-pottery site of Aşıklı Höyük in Central Anatolia. Anatolica, XVII, 123–174.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A., 2017. Hungry architecture: spaces of consumption and predation at Göbekli Tepe. World Archaeology, 49 (3), 318–337. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1332528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid, S., 2005a. Level VII: space 113, space 112, space 105, space 109, building 40, space 106, spaces 168 & 169, buildings 8 & 20, building 24 and relative heights of level VII. In: I. Hodder, ed. Excavating Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-1999 seasons. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 283–338.
   Google Scholar
• Farid, S., 2005b. Level VIII: space 161, space 162, building 4, space 115, buildings 21 & 7, building 6 and relative heights of level VIII. In: I. Hodder, ed. Excavating Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-1999 seasons. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 227–282.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., 2013. The emergent past: a relational realist archaeology of early bronze age mortuary practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, D., et al., 1972. Excavations at Can Hasan III, 1969-1970. In: E.S. Higgs, eds. Papers in economic prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., and Wallace, L., 2020. Making space for past futures: rural landscape temporalities in Roman Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 30 (2), 327–342. doi:10.1017/S0959774319000647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, E., et al., 2009. Seated memory: new insights into near Eastern Neolithic mortuary variability from tell halula, Syria. Current Anthropology, 50 (3), 379–391. doi:10.1086/598211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddow, S.D., et al., 2021. Funerary practices I: body treatment and deposition. In: I. Hodder, eds. Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2009-2017 seasons. London: British Institute at Ankara, 281–314.
   Google Scholar
• Haddow, S.D., and Knüsel, C.J., 2017. Skull retrieval and secondary burial practices in the Neolithic Near East: recent insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Bioarchaeology International, 1 (1–2), 52–71. doi:10.5744/bi.2017.1002
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G., 2018. Object-oriented ontology: a new theory of everything. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, O.J.T., 2018. More than representation: multiscalar assemblages and the Deleuzian challenge to archaeology. History of the Human Sciences, 31 (3), 83–104. doi:10.1177/0952695117752016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, O.J.T., and Robb, J., 2012. Multiple ontologies and the problem of the body in history. American Anthropologist, 114 (4), 668–679. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendon, J.A., 2010. Houses in a landscape: memory and everyday life in Mesoamerica. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., 2012. Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., 2018. Introduction: two forms of history making in the Neolithic of the Middle East. In: I. Hodder, ed. Religion, history and place in the origin of settled life. Louisville: University Press of Colorado, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and Farid, S., 2013. Questions, history of work and summary of results. In: I. Hodder, ed. Çatalhöyük excavations: the 2000–2008 seasons. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and Pels, P., 2010. History houses: a new interpretation of architectural elaboration at Çatalhöyük. In: I. Hodder, eds. Religion in the emergence of civilization: Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D., 2009. Cemetery and settlement burial in the lower bavarian LBK. In: D. Hofmann and P. Bickle, eds. Creating communities: new advances in central European neolithic research. Oxford: Oxbow, 220–234.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, L., 1994. Village spaces: settlement and society in Northeastern Iran. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A.M., Díaz-Guardamino, M., and Crellin, R.J., 2016. From artefact biographies to ‘multiple objects’: a new analysis of the decorated plaques of the Irish sea region. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 49 (2), 113–133. doi:10.1080/00293652.2016.1227359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, R.A., 2010. In the beginning: the experience of residential burial in Prehispanic Honduras. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 20 (1), 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2011.01026.x
   Google Scholar
• Karamurat, C., Atakuman, Ç., and Erdoğu, B., 2021. Digging pits and making places at Uğurlu during the sixth millennium BC. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 40 (1), 23–42. doi:10.1111/ojoa.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, K., 2020. Dynamic houses and communities at Çatalhöyük: a building biography approach to prehistoric social structure. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 30 (3), 451–468. doi:10.1017/S0959774320000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knüsel, C.J., et al., 2021. Bioarchaeology at Neolithic Çatalhöyük: biological indicators of health, well-being and lifeway in their social context. In: I. Hodder, eds. Peopling the landscape of Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2009-2017 Seasons. London: British Institute at Ankara, 281–314.
   Google Scholar
• Kuijt, I., 2008. The regeneration of life: neolithic structures of symbolic remembering and forgetting. Current Anthropology, 49 (2), 171–197. doi:10.1086/526097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laneri, N., 2010. A family affair: the use of intramural funerary chambers in Mesopotamia during the late third and early second millennia B.C.E. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 20 (1), 121–135. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2011.01031.x
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and Mol, A., 2008. Globalisation in practice: on the politics of boiling pigswill. Geoforum, 39 (1), 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, S., 2013. The performance of building and technological choice made visible in Mudbrick architecture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23 (2), 263–282. doi:10.1017/S0959774313000292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, G., 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G., 2013. Afterword: archaeology and the science of new objects. In: B. Alberti, A.M. Jones, and J. Pollard, eds. Archaeology after interpretation. returning materials to archaeological theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G., and Witmore, C., 2021. Paradigm lost: what is a commitment to theory in contemporary archaeology? Norwegian Archaeological Review, 55 (1), 64–77. doi:10.1080/00293652.2021.1986127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marciniak, A., et al., 2015. The nature of the household in the upper levels at Çatalhöyük. In: I. Hodder and A. Marciniak, eds. Assembling Çatalhöyük. Leeds: European Association of Archaeologists, 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, W., 2005. Micromorphological and microstratigraphic traces of uses and concepts of space. In: I. Hodder, ed. Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 355–398.
   Google Scholar
• McAnany, P.A., 2010. Practices of place-making, Ancestralizing, and re-animation within memory communities. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 20 (1), 136–142. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2011.01032.x
   Google Scholar
• Mellaart, J., 1963. Excavations at çatal Hüyük, 1962: Second Preliminary Report. Anatolian Studies, 13, 43–103. doi:10.2307/3642490
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, L., 2008. The nature of the beast: curating animals and ancestors at Çatalhöyük. World Archaeology, 40 (3), 373–389. doi:10.1080/00438240802261416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A., 1999. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47 (1_suppl), 74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., 2002. The Body multiple: ontology in MEDICAL PRACTICE. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., 2015. Who knows what a woman is … On the differences and the relations between the sciences. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 2 (1), 57–75. doi:10.17157/mat.2.1.215
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A., 2009. Hearth and home: the burial of infants within romano-British domestic contexts. Childhood in the Past, 2 (1), 33–54. doi:10.1179/cip.2009.2.1.33
   Google Scholar
• Moses, S.K., 2008. Çatalhöyük’s foundation burials: ritual child sacrifice or convenient deaths? In: K. Bacvarov, ed. Babies reborn: infant/child burials in pre- and protohistory. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Özbaşaran, M., Duru, G., and Stiner, M.C., eds., 2018. The early settlement at Aşıklı Höyük: essays in honor of Ufuk Esin. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., et al., 2013. Food and social complexity at Çayönü Tepesi, southeastern Anatolia: stable isotope evidence of differentiation in diet according to burial practice and sex in the early Neolithic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 32 (2), 180–189. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2013.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilloud, M.A., et al., 2016. A bioarchaeological and forensic re-assessment of vulture defleshing and mortuary practices at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, 735–743.
   Google Scholar
• Pilloud, M.A., and Larsen, C.S., 2011. “Official” and “practical” kin: inferring social and community structure from dental phenotype at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 145 (4), 519–530. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plug, J.-H., Hodder, I., and Akkermans, P.M.M.G., 2021. Breaking continuity? Site formation and temporal depth at Çatalhöyük and Tell Sabi Abyad. Anatolian Studies, 17, 1–27. doi:10.1017/S0066154621000028
   Google Scholar
• St. George, I., 2012. Çatalhöyük murals: a snapshot of conservation and experimental research. In: R. Tringham and M. Stevanović, eds. Last house on the hill: BACH area reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 473–480.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, L.P., and Rodning, C.B., 2010. Residential burial, gender roles, and political development in late prehistoric and early Cherokee cultures of the southern appalachians. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 20 (1), 79–97. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2011.01029.x
   Google Scholar
• Tibbetts, B., 2017. Perinatal death and cultural buffering in a Neolithic community at Çatalhöyük. In: E. Murphy and M.L. Roy, eds. Children, death and burial: archaeological discourses. London: Oxbow, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tripković, J., 2017. Building 131. In: S.D. Haddow, ed. Çatalhöyük archive report 2017. Stanford: Çatalhöyük Research Project, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tung, B., 2013. Building with Mud: an analysis of architectural materials at Çatalhöyük. In: I. Hodder, ed. Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük REPORTS from the 2000–2008 seasons. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yaka, R., 2020. Archaeogenomic Analysis of Population Genetic Relationships and Kinship Patterns in the Sedentary Societies From Neolithic Anatolia. Thesis (PhD). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Yeomans, L., 2013. Building 66. In: I. Hodder, ed. Çatalhöyük excavations: the 2000–2008 seasons. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 481–484.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, B., Hackley, L.D., and Steadman, S.R., 2018. Sanctifying the house: child burial in prehistoric anatolia. Near Eastern Archaeology, 81 (3), 164–173. doi:10.5615/neareastarch.81.3.0164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar