Colonialism and the European Mesolithic

REFERENCES

• Alberti, B., 2016. Archaeologies of ontology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45 (1), 163–179. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti, B., and Marshall, Y., 2009. Animating archaeology: local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19 (3), 344–356. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argent, G., 2013. Turns, tropes and terminology. Toward an interspecies ‘(inter) social’. Archaeological Dialogues, 20 (2), 137–143. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkell, A.J., 1947. Early Khartoum. Antiquity, 21 (84), 172–181. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00016653
   Google Scholar
• Asselin, H., and Basile, S., 2018. Concrete ways to decolonize research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17 (3), 643–650.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, A., 2006. Kalahari revisionism, Vienna and the‘indigenous peoples’ debate. Social Anthropology, 14 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2006.tb00020.x
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, J., 2015. Indigeneity. In: J.D. Wright, ed. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Oxford: Elsevier, 755–761.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G.K., and Holmwood, J., 2021. Colonialism and modern social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird-David, N., 2015. Hunting and gathering societies: anthropology.In: International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences,Second.Oxford: Elsevier,428–431.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., 1984. The social foundations of prehistoric Britain: themes and variations in the archaeology of power. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, L.M., and Kearney, A., 2016. Sitting in the gap: ethnoarchaeology, rock art and methodological openness. World Archaeology, 48 (5), 642–655. doi:10.1080/00438243.2016.1193042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinch Petersen, E., and Meiklejohn, C., 2007. Historical context of the term ‘Complexity’ in the Southern Scandinavian Mesolithic. Acta Archaeologica, 78 (2), 181–192. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0390.2007.00105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruchac, M., 2014. Decolonization in ARCHAEOLOGICAL THEOry. In: C. Smith, ed. Encyclopedia of global archaeology. New York: Springer, 2069–2077.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, R., 2006. Ritual. In: C. Conneller and G.M. Warren, eds. Mesolithic Britain and Ireland: new approaches. Stroud: Tempus, 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, P.R., 2020. Interpretative shifts in understanding the prehistoric settlement of the indian subcontinent: comparing Western and Indian historical perspectives. In: M. Porr and J.M. Matthews, eds. Interrogating human origins: decolonisation and the deep human past. London: Routledge, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Cipolla, C., Crellin, R.J., and Harris, O.J.T., 2021. Posthuman archaeologies, archaeological posthumanisms. Journal of Posthumanism, 1 (1), 5–21. doi:10.33182/jp.v1i1.1357
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, H., 2005. Straight down the line? A queer consideration of hunter-gatherer studies in north-west Europe. World Archaeology, 37 (4), 630–636. doi:10.1080/00438240500395862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conneller, C., 2004. Becoming deer. Corporeal transformations at Star Carr. Archaeological Dialogues, 11 (1), 37–56. doi:10.1017/S1380203804001357
   Google Scholar
• Conneller, C., 2011. An archaeology of materials: substantial transformations in early prehistoric Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J.J., and MacEachern, S., 2016. Ethnoarchaeology as slow science. World Archaeology, 48 (5), 628–641. doi:10.1080/00438243.2016.1260046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnik, S.A., 1976. The theory of the Mesolithic in European archaeology. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 120 (1), 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1988. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Domanska, E., 2018. Is this stone alive? Prefiguring the future role of archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 22–35. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1553060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, B., et al., 2022. Decolonising the Mesolithic? Mesolithic Miscellany, 28 (2), 59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, B., and Warren, G.H., 2022. Consumers Consumers, not contributors? The study of the Mesolithic and the study of Hunter-Gatherers. Open Archaeology, 8 (1), 608–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, E.C., 2021a. Land Use and ecological change: a 12,000-Year History. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46 (1), 1–33. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010822
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E.C., et al. 2021b. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (17), e2023483118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023483118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian, J., 1983. Time and the Other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D., and Wengrow, D., 2021. The dawn of everything: a new history of humanity. Dublin: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilakis, Y., and Overton, N.J., 2013. A multi-species archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, 20 (2), 159–173. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges. The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlin, E.K., 2019. Sámi archaeology and the fear of political involvement: Finnish Archaeologists’ perspectives on ethnicity and the repatriation of sámi cultural heritage. Archaeologies, 15 (2), 254–284. doi:10.1007/s11759-019-09366-7
   Google Scholar
• Harris, O.J., and Cipolla, C.N., 2017. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, J., 2022. Fresh banana leaves. Healing indigenous landscapes through indigenous science. Berkley: North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, M., and Pedersen, M.A., 2017. The ontological turn: an anthropological exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., 2013. Engagement with Indigenous communities in key sectors. Canberra: Australian Government/Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P., 2003. Material culture and sacred landscape: the anthropology of the Siberian Khanty. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, A., 2003. The Return of the native. Current Anthropology, 44 (3), 389–402. doi:10.1086/368120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahelma, A., 2019. Sexy beasts: animistic ontology, sexuality and hunter-gatherer rock art in Northern Fennoscandia. Time and Mind, 12 (3), 221–238. doi:10.1080/1751696X.2019.1645528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, P.J., 2014. Hunter-gatherer-fishers, ethnoarchaeology, and analogical reasoning. In: V. Cummings, P. Jordan, and M. Zvelebil, eds. The Oxford handbook of the archaeology and anthropology of hunter-gatherers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104–150.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2009. Perspectivism:‘Type’ or ‘bomb’? Anthropology Today, 25 (2), 1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00652.x
   Google Scholar
• Lavi, N., Rudge, A., and Warren, G.M., 2023. Rewild your inner hunter-gatherer: how an idea about our ancestral condition is recruited into popular debate in Britain and Ireland. Current Anthropology, http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12796.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtola, V.P., 2015. Sami Histories, Colonialism, and Finland. Arctic Anthropology, 52 (2), 22–36. doi:10.3368/aa.52.2.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M., 2021. Pollution is Colonialism. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannermaa, K., 2008. Archaeology of wings: birds and people in the Baltic Sea region during the Stone age. Thesis (PhD). Faculty of the Arts: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Mansrud, A., 2017. Untangling social, ritual and cosmological aspects of fishhook manufacture in the middle mesolithic coastal communities of NE skagerrak. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 46 (1), 31–47. doi:10.1111/1095-9270.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Cobo, J., 1986. Study of the problem of discrimination against indigenous populations: e/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• McNiven, I.J., 2016. Theoretical challenges of indigenous archaeology: setting an Agenda. American Antiquity, 81 (1), 27–41. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.81.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiven, I.J., and Russell, L., 2005. Appropriated pasts: indigenous peoples and the colonial culture of archaeology. Oxford: AltMira.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W.D., and Walsh, C.E., 2018. On Decoloniality: concepts, analytics, praxis. London: Duke.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, L.M., et al. 2020. Indigenous alterity as archaeological Praxis. In: R. Crelin, ed. Archaeological theory in dialogue: situating relationalisty, ontology, posthumanism, and indigenous paradigms. London: Routledge, 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nyland, A., 2020. In search of cloudstones? The contribution of charismatic rocks towards an understanding of Mesolithic and Neolithic communities in the montane regions of South Norway. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 86, 43–64. doi:10.1017/ppr.2020.4
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, C.-G., 2009. Sámi prehistories. The politics of archaeology and identity in northernmost Europe. Thesis (PhD). Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, C.-G., and Nordin, J.M., 2015. Mining Sápmi: colonial Histories, Sámi archaeology. Arctic Anthropology, 52 (2), 6–21. doi:10.3368/aa.52.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, N.J., 2018. The rhythm of life: exploring the role of daily and seasonal rhythms in the development of human–nonhuman relationships in the British Early Mesolithic. In: S. Pilaar Birch, ed. Multispecies archaeology. London: Routledge, 295–309.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, N.J., 2019. A bright multispecies future. Hunter Gatherer Research Journal, 4 (2), 251–255. doi:10.3828/hgr.2018.17
   Google Scholar
• Overton, N.J., and Hamilakis, Y., 2013. A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic. Archaeological Dialogues, 20 (2), 111–136. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasarić, M., and Warren, G.M., 2019. Interactions of care and control: human–animal relationships in hunter-gatherer communities in near-contemporary Eastern Siberia and the Mesolithic of Northwest Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 29 (3), 465–478. doi:10.1017/S095977431900012X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimblott, K., 2020. Decolonising the University: the origins and meaning of a movement. The Political Quarterly, 91 (1), 210–216. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluciennik, M., 2013. Escaping from the pen? Archaeological Dialogues, 20 (2), 155–159. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porr, M., and Bell, H.R., 2012. ‘Rock-art’, ‘Animism’ and two-way thinking: towards a complementary epistemology in the understanding of material culture and ‘Rock-art’ of hunting and gathering people. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19 (1), 161–205. doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9105-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porr, M., and Matthews, J.M., eds, 2020. Interrogating human origins: decolonisation and the deep Human Past. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porsanger, J., 2018. Doložiid dutkama etihkka álgoálbmotkonteavsttas/Studies of the past and research ethics in indigenous context. A Key note paper presented at the conference “Advances in Sámi Archaeology”, 6–8 June 2018 in Inari, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Preucel, R.W., 2021. The predicament of ontology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 31 (3), 461–467. doi:10.1017/S0959774321000147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley-Conwy, P., 1996. Why didn’t Westropp’s ‘Mesolithic’ catch on in 1872? Antiquity, 70 (270), 940–944. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00084209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, L.A., and Satish Kumar, M., 2019. Ireland and irishness: the contextuality of postcolonial identity. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109 (1), 202–222. doi:10.1080/24694452.2018.1507812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlanger, N., 2013. One day hero. Jules reboux at the crucible of prehistory in 1860s Paris. Complutum, 24, 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P.R. and Mrozowski, S.A., eds. 2013. The Death of Prehistory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P.R., and Mrozowski, S.A., 2013. The death of prehistory: reforming the past, looking to the future. In: P.R. Schmidt and S.A. Mrozowski, eds. The death of prehistory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P.E.L., 1961. More on the Mesolithic. Antiquity, 35 (137), 61–63. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00106623
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L.T., 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J., 2014. Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21 (1), 33–47. doi:10.1177/1474474013486067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., 2020. Plants as persons: perceptions of the natural world in the North European Mesolithic. Time and Mind, 13 (3), 307–330. doi:10.1080/1751696X.2020.1815292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and Yang, K.W., 2012. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1 (1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2009. The State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples: ST/ESA/328. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Viverios de Castro, E., 2014. Cannibal metaphysics: for a post-structural anthropology. Translated by P. Skafish. London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vivieros De Castro, E., 2013. The relative native. Translated by J. Sauma and M. Holbraad. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3 (3), 469–502.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, G.M., 2005. Mesolithic lives in Scotland. Stroud: Tempus.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, G.M., 2014. Transformations? The Mesolithic of north-west Europe. In: V. Cummings, P. Jordan, and M. Zvelebil, eds. The Oxford handbook of the archaeology and anthropology of hunter-gatherers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 537–554.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, G.M., 2021. Hunter-gatherer Ireland: making connections in an Island World. Oxford: Oxbow.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, G.M., In press. The Mesolithic: what is it and why should we care? L. Nilsson Stutz, M. Torv, and R.P. Stjerna, eds. Oxford Handbook of Mesolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, V., 2013. Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (First woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2 (1), 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Widlok, T., 2020. Hunting and gathering. In: F. Stein, et al., eds. The Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology. Cambridge: Department of Social Anthropology. doi:10.29164/20hunt
   Google Scholar
• Živaljević, I., 2021. Multispecies pasts and the possibilities of multispecies futures in the age of the Anthropocene. Етноантрополошкипроблеми, 16 (3), 659–676.
   Google Scholar
• Zvelebil, M., et al. 2009. The Mesolithic and the 21st Century. In: S. McCartan, ed. Mesolithic horizons: papers Presented at the seventh international conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Belfast 2005. Oxford: Oxbow, xlvii–lviii.
   Google Scholar