255
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
research article

Three Little Birds: Reassembling Typological Thought

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, C.C., 1881. Primitive industry: or, illustrations of the handiwork, in stone, bone and Clay, of the native races of the Northern Atlantic Seaboard of America. Salem, Massachusetts: The Salem Press.
  • Abel, T.J., Stothers, D.M., and Koralewski, J.M., 2001. The williams mortuary complex: a transitional archaic regional interaction center in Northwestern Ohio. In: O.H. Prufer, S.E. Pedde, and R.S. Meindl, eds. Archaic transitions in Ohio and Kentucky prehistory. Kent, Ohio: The Kent State University Press, pp. 290–327.
  • Adams, W.Y., 2008. Classification and typology. In: D.M. Pearsall, ed. Encyclopedia of archaeology. Elsevier, pp. 1019–1026.
  • Adams, W.Y., and Adams, E.W., 1991. Archaeological typology and practical reality: a dialectical approach to artifact classification and sorting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Agbe-Davies, A.S., 2016. Tobacco, pipes, and race in Colonial Virginia: little tubes of mighty power. New York: Routledge.
  • Barad, K., 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Beck, A.S., 2018. Revisiting the Trelleborg house: a discussion of house types and assemblages. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 142–161. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1503324
  • Bennett, J., 2009. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w.
  • Binford, L.R., 1965. Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process 1. American Antiquity, 31 (2), 203–210. doi:10.2307/2693985
  • Binford, L.R., and Binford, S.R., 1966. A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois Facies. American Anthropologist, 68 (2), 238–295. doi:10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030
  • Boozer, A.L., 2015. The tyranny of typologies: evidential reasoning in Romano-Egyptian domestic archaeology. In: R. Chapman and A. Wylie, eds. Material evidence: learning from archaeological practice. London: Routledge, pp. 92–109.
  • Borck, L., 2018. Constructing the future history: prefiguration as historical epistemology and the chronopolitics of archaeology. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 5 (2), 229–238. doi:10.1558/jca.33560
  • Bordes, F., 1953a. Essai de Classification des industries “moustériennes”. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 50 (7/8), 457–466. doi:10.3406/bspf.1953.5156
  • Bordes, F., 1953b. Levalloisien et Moustérien. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 50 (4), 226–235. doi:10.3406/bspf.1953.3035
  • Bordes, F., 1972. A tale of two caves. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
  • Bordes, F., and de Sonneville‐Bordes, D., 1970. The significance of variability in palaeolithic assemblages. World Archaeology, 2 (1), 61–73. doi:10.1080/00438243.1970.9979464
  • Brown, C.E., 1908. The Bird-stone Ceremonials of Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Archaeologist, 8 (1), 5–21.
  • Bunte, K., and Abt, S.R., 2001. Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable gravel-and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed monitoring. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
  • Cipolla, C.N., and Gallo, T., 2021. Can birdstones sing? Rethinking material-semiotic approaches in contemporary archaeological theory. World Archaeology, 52 (3), 463–483. doi:10.1080/00438243.2021.1913218
  • Clarke, D.L., 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity, 47 (185), 6–18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
  • Clisby, D., 2015. Deleuze’s secret dualism? Competing accounts of the relationship between the virtual and the actual. Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, 24, 127–149.
  • Conneller, C., 2011. An archaeology of materials: substantial transformations in early prehistoric europe. New York: Routledge.
  • Conneller, C., 2016. Deception and (Mis)representation: skeuomorphs, materials, and form. In: B. Alberti, A.M. Jones, and J. Pollard, eds. Archaeology after interpretation: returning materials to archaeological theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 119–134. 10.4324/9781315434254-6.
  • Crellin, R.J., Fowler, C., and Gamble, M., 2020. Thinking outside the cist: interpreting a unique artefact assemblage from an early bronze age burial on the Isle of Man. Antiquity, 94 (378), 1444–1463. doi:10.15184/aqy.2020.175
  • Cunningham, W.M., and Griffin, J.B., 1948. A study of the glacial kame culture in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana: with an Appendix by James B. Griffin. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.11395854.
  • DeLanda, M., 2016. Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1987. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • de Mortillet, G., 1873. Classification des diverses périodes de l’âge de la pierre, par Gabriel de Mortillet: Extrait du compte rendu du congrès international d’anthropologie et d’archéologie préhistoriques 6me session, Bruxelles: 1872. Typ. de M. Weissenbruch.
  • Dibble, H.L., 1987. The interpretation of middle paleolithic Scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 52 (1), 109–117. doi:10.2307/281062
  • Dixon, R.B., 1923. The Racial History of Man. New York: Scribner.
  • Donaldson, W.S., and Wortner, S., 1995. The Hind site and the Glacial Kame Burial Complex in Ontario. Ontario Archaeology, 59, 5–95.
  • Fernandes, P., et al., 2007. Origins of prehistoric flints: the neocortex memory revealed by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 6 (8), 557–568. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2007.09.015.
  • Ford, J.A., 1954. Comment on AC Spaulding, “statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types”. American Antiquity, 19 (4), 390–391. doi:10.2307/277609
  • Ford, J.A., and Steward, J.H., 1954. On the concept of types. American Anthropologist, 56 (1), 42–57. doi:10.1525/aa.1954.56.1.02a00050
  • Fowler, C., 2013. Dynamic assemblages, or the past is what endures: change and the duration of relations. In: B. Alberti, A.M. Jones, and J. Pollard, eds. Archaeology after interpretation. Returning materials to archaeological theory. CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 235–256. 10.4324/9781315434254-12.
  • Fowler, C., 2017. Relational typologies, assemblage theory and early bronze age burials. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27 (1), 95–109. doi:10.1017/S0959774316000615
  • Gallo, T., 2017. Pétrographie et technologie de pierres fissiles et polies: Le mudstone shaleux et l’ardoise de la Baie Sainte-Marguerite. In: A.L. Burke and C. Chapdelaine, eds. L’Archaïque au Québec: Six millénaires d’histoire amérindienne. Collection Paleo-Québec n° 36. Montréal: Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec, pp. 187–208.
  • Gamble, J.C., 1971. Durability-Plasticity Classification of Shales and Other Argillaceous Rocks. Thesis (PhD). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Gaumé, É., 2007. Les dépôts de palets et de disques en schiste du Néolithique ancien : des stocks de produits semi-ouvrés? Oui, mais encore? (Précisions pratiques avec le savoir-faire ancestral des fendeurs manuels d’ardoise dans les Massifs armoricain et ardennais). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 104 (1), 55–61. doi:10.3406/bspf.2007.13647
  • Gero, J.M., 2007. Honoring Ambiguity/Problematizing certitude. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14 (3), 311–327. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9037-1
  • Gnecco, C., 2013. On hybrids Recently unleashed. In: C. Gnecco and C. Langebaek, eds. Against typological tyranny in archaeology: a South American perspective. New York: Springer New York, pp. 165–178. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8724-1_10.
  • Gnecco, C., and Langebaek, C., 2013a. Against typological tyranny in archaeology: a South American perspective. New York: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8724-1.
  • Gnecco, C., and Langebaek, C., 2013b. Introduction: against Typological Tyranny. In: C. Gnecco and C. Langebaek, eds. Against typological tyranny in archaeology: a South American perspective. New York: Springer New York, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8724-1.
  • Gosden, C., and Marshall, Y., 1999. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology, 31 (2), 169–178. doi:10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439
  • Gräslund, B., 1987. The birth of prehistoric chronology: dating methods and dating systems in nineteenth-century Scandinavian archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066
  • Harris, O.J.T., 2018. Towards virtual typologies. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 162–165. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1531917
  • Harris, O.J.T., 2020. What do we mean by relational anyway? In: R.J. Crellin, et al. eds. Archaeological theory in dialogue: situating relationality, ontology, posthumanism, and indigenous paradigms. London: Routledge Press, pp. 14–33. 10.4324/9780429027147-2.
  • Harris, O.J.T., 2021. Assembling past worlds: materials, bodies and architecture in Neolithic Britain. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780367814786.
  • Henry, E.R., Angelbeck, B., and Rizvi, U.Z., 2017. Against typology: a critical approach to archaeological order. The SAA Archaeological Record, 17 (1), 28–31.
  • Hinsdale, W.B., 1925. Primitive man in Michigan. Ann Harbor: University Museum, University of Michigan.
  • Holland-Lulewicz, J., 2021. From categories to connections in the archaeology of Eastern North America. Journal of Archaeological Research, 29 (4), 537–579. doi:10.1007/s10814-020-09154-w
  • Johnson, M., 2010. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Second ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Johnston, L., 1954a. Birdstones and their distributional patterns in Ohio. Ohio Archaeologist, 4 (3), 8–38.
  • Johnston, L., 1954b. Birdstones and their distributional patterns in Ohio (second installment). Ohio Archaeologist, 4 (4), 20–36.
  • Jørgensen, E.K., 2021. Scalar effects in ground slate technology and the adaptive consequences for circumpolar maritime hunter-gatherers. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 28 (2), 333–385. doi:10.1007/s10816-020-09458-7
  • Joy, J., 2009. Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology, 41 (4), 540–556. doi:10.1080/00438240903345530
  • Kidder, A.V., 1924. An introduction to the study of southwestern archaeology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Lucas, G., 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McKern, W.C., 1939. The Midwestern taxonomic method as an aid to archaeological culture study. American Antiquity, 4 (4), 301–313. doi:10.2307/276087
  • Montelius, O., 1899. Typologien eller utvecklingsläran tillämpad på det menskliga arbetet. Svenska fornminnesföreningens tidskrift, 10 (3), 237–268.
  • Moorehead, W.K., 1899. The Bird-stone Ceremonial. Saranac Lake: Allen I. Vosburgh.
  • Moorehead, W.K., 1900. Prehistoric implements: a reference book. A description of the ornaments, utensils, and implements of Pre-Columbian Man in America. Cincinnati, Ohio: R. Clarke.
  • Moorehead, W.K., 1917. Stone ornaments used by Indians in the United States and Canada: being a description of certain charm stones, gorgets, tubes, bird stones and problematical forms. Andover, Massachusetts: Andover Press.
  • Moorehead, W.K., 1922. The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.7177.
  • Neubauer, F., 2018. Use-alteration analysis of fire-cracked rocks. American Antiquity, 83 (4), 681–700. doi:10.1017/aaq.2018.33
  • Neusius, P.D., and Neusius, S.W., 2020. North American classification schemes: overview. In: C. Smith, ed. Encyclopedia of global archaeology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 7883–7894.
  • Normark, J., 2010. Involutions of materiality. Operationalizing a neo-materialist perspective through the causeways at Ichmul and Yo’okop. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17 (2), 132–173. doi:10.1007/s10816-010-9079-7
  • Nunez, M., 1998. Slates, the “plastics” of stone age Finland. In: L. Holm and K. Knutsson, eds. Proceedings from the Third Flint Alternatives Conference. Uppsala, Sweden. October 18-20, 1996. Occasional Papers in Archaeology 16, 105–124.
  • Pearce, R.J., 1997. Licence report for 1995-1996 investigations at historic and prehistoric sites within “kilworth west” subdivision, draft plan of subdivision 39T-93007, kilworth, Lobo Township, Middlesex county. Ontario: submitted to: cultural programs branch. Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation as Part of London Museum of Archaeology’s Archaeological Consulting Licences 95-014 and 96-016, Museum Projects.
  • Ritchie, W.A., 1937a. Culture influences from Ohio in New York archaeology. American Antiquity, 2 (3), 182–194. doi:10.2307/276004
  • Ritchie, W.A., 1937b. The Iroquois and the Birdstone. American Antiquity, 2 (3), 214–215. doi:10.2307/276013
  • Ritchie, W.A., 1944. The Pre‐Iroquoian occupations of New York State. Rochester, New York: Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences.
  • Ritchie, W.A., 1965. The archaeology of New York State. Garden City, New York: The Natural History Press.
  • Ritchie, W.A., and Dragoo, D.W., 1960. The eastern dispersal of Adena. Albany, New York: New York State Museum and Science Service Bulletin, p. 379.
  • Ritchie, W.A., and Funk, R.E., 1973. Aboriginal settlement patterns in the northeast. Albany, New York: The State Education Department, State University of New York.
  • Scott, D.D., et al., 2006. An Archeological Inventory and Overview of Pipestone National Monument, Minnesota. Lincoln, Nebraska: United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Midwest Archeological Center.
  • Solecki, R.S., 1953. Exploration of an Adena Mound at Natrium, West Virginia. Anthropological Papers 40. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution.
  • Sørensen, M.L.S., 1997. Material culture and typology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 5 (1), 179–192. doi:10.37718/CSA.1997.12
  • Sørensen, M.L.S., 2015. Paradigm lost’ – on the state of typology within archaeological theory. In: K. Kristiansen, J. Turek, and L. Šmejda, eds. Paradigm found: archaeological theory: present, past and future: essays in honour of Evžen Neustupný. Oxford: Oxbow books, pp. 84–94. 10.2307/j.ctvh1dpc1.10.
  • Sørensen, T.F., 2012. Original copies: seriality, similarity and the simulacrum in the early bronze age. Danish Journal of Archaeology, 1 (1), 45–61. doi:10.1080/21662282.2012.750446
  • Spaulding, A.C., 1954. Reply to Ford. American Antiquity, 19 (4), 391–393. doi:10.2307/277610
  • Spence, M.W., and Fox, W.A., 1986. The early woodland occupations of Southern Ontario. Early Woodland Archaeology, 2, 4–46.
  • Spence, M.W., Pihl, R.H., and Murphy, C., 1990. Cultural complexes of the early and middle woodland periods. In: C.J. Ellis and N. Ferris, eds. The archaeology of Southern Ontario to AD 1650. Ontario: Occasional Publications of the London Chapter, Ontario Archaeological Society Inc, pp. 125–170.
  • Stothers, D.M., and Abel, T.J., 1993. Archaeological reflections of the late archaic and early woodland time periods in the Western Lake Erie Region. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 21, 25–109.
  • Taché, K., 2011a. Structure and regional diversity of the Meadowood interaction sphere. Michigan: University of Michigan Museum. doi:10.3998/mpub.11395980.
  • Taché, K., 2011b. New perspectives on Meadowood Trade Items. American Antiquity, 76 (1), 41–79. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.76.1.41
  • Townsend, E.C., 1959. Birdstones of the North American Indian: a study of these most interesting stone forms, the area of their distribution, their cultural provenience, possible uses, and antiquity. Indianapolis: EC Townsend.
  • Trigger, B.G., 2006. A history of archaeological thought. Second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Webb, W.S., and Baby, R.S., 1957. The Adena people, no. 2. Ohio: Ohio Historical Society.
  • Yang, J. et al., 2020. Experimental investigation of the effects of water content on the anisotropy of mode I fracture toughness of bedded mudstones. PLoS One, 15 (8), e0237909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237909.
  • Young, T.H., 1950. Bird-stones – Prehistoric Art of No Limited Degree. Journal of the Illinois State Archaeological Society, 1 (2), 35–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.