References
- D. G. CACUCI and R. FANG, “Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Counter-Flow Mechanical Draft Cooling Towers Operating Under Saturated Conditions—I: Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis,” Nucl. Technol., 198 (2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1294429.
- D. G. CACUCI, “Predictive Modeling of Coupled Multi-Physics Systems: I. Theory,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 70, 266 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.027.
- R. FANG, D. G. CACUCI, and M. C. BADEA, “Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower Model: II. Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties,” Energies, 9, 747 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en9090747.
- A. J. GARRETT, M. J. PARKER, and E. VILLA-ALEMAN, “Savannah River Site Cooling Tower Collection,” SRNL-DOD-2005-07, Savannah River National Laboratory (2005).
- D. G. CACUCI and M. C. BADEA, “Predictive Modeling of Coupled Multi-Physics Systems: II. Illustrative Application to Reactor Physics,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 70, 279 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.025.
- C. LATTEN and D. G. CACUCI, “Predictive Modeling of Coupled Systems: Uncertainty Reduction Using Multiple Reactor Physics Benchmarks,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 178, 156 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-110.
- D. G. CACUCI and E. ARSLAN, “Reducing Uncertainties via Predictive Modeling: FLICA4 Calibration Using BFBT Benchmarks,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 176, 339 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-31.
- E. ARSLAN and D. G. CACUCI, “Predictive Modeling of Liquid-Sodium Thermal–Hydraulics Experiments and Computations,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 63, 355 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.029.
- S. E. ALEMAN and A. J. GARRETT, “Operational Cooling Tower Model (Cttool V1.0),” SRNL-STI-2015-00039, Rev. 0, Savannah River National Laboratory (2015).
- D. G. CACUCI and R. FANG, “Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower: I. Adjoint Sensitivity Model,” Energies, 9, 718 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en9090718.
- I. FARAGÓ, A. HAVASI, and Z. ZLATEV, Advanced Numerical Methods for Complex Environmental Models: Needs and Availability, Bentham Science Publishers, Oak Park, Illinois (2013).
- D. G. CACUCI, M. I. NAVON, and M. IONESCU-BUJOR, Computational Methods for Data Evaluation and Assimilation, Chapman Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida (2014).
- D. G. CACUCI and M. IONESCU-BUJOR, “On the Evaluation of Discrepant Scientific Data with Unrecognized Errors,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 165, 1 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-37A.
- D. G. CACUCI, “Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) for Computing Exactly and Efficiently First- and Second-Order Sensitivities in Large-Scale Linear Systems: I. Computational Methodology,” J. Comput. Phys., 284, 687 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.042.
- D. G. CACUCI, “The Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology for Large Nonlinear Systems—I: Theory,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 184, 1, 16 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE16-16.
- D. G. CACUCI, “Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) for Computing Exactly and Efficiently First- and Second-Order Sensitivities in Large-Scale Linear Systems: II. Illustrative Application to a Paradigm Particle Diffusion Problem,” J. Comput. Phys., 284, 700 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.030.
- D. G. CACUCI, “Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of a Benchmark Heat Transport Problem—I: Analytical Results,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 183, 1 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-81.
- D. G. CACUCI et al., “Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of a Benchmark Heat Transport Problem—II: Computational Results Using G4M Reactor Thermal-Hydraulic Parameters,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 183, 22 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-80.
- D. G. CACUCI, “The Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology for Nonlinear Systems—II: Illustrative Application to a Nonlinear Heat Conduction Problem,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 184, 1, 31 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NSE16-31.