Developing Separate Effects Transient Test Experiments Using an Out-of-Pile Flowing Water Loop

References

• D. WACHS, “Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials in the United States,” JOM, 64, 12, 1396 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-012-0482-2.
   Google Scholar
• B. K. HEATH and C. C. RACE, “TREAT Restart Project,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1369 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1589853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. W. LaPORTA, “Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Initial Approach to Restart Criticality Following Extended Standby Operation,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1290 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1565471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. M. GERSTNER et al., “Safety Strategy and Update of the TREAT Facility Safety Basis,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1266 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1556993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. M. CHASE, A. W. LaPORTA, and J. R. PARRY, “Analysis of Core Characterization Transients for TREAT Restart,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1312 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1585162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. HOLSCHUH, S. WATSON, and D. CHICHESTER, “Metrology for Transient Reactor Characterization Using Uranium Wires,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1336 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1599613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. E. WOOLSTENHULME and J. D. WEIST, “ATF Transient Testing Pre-Conceptual Design and Engineering Considerations Summary,” INL/EXT-13-29898, Idaho National Laboratory (2013).
   Google Scholar
• N. WOOLSTENHULME et al., “Development of Irradiation Test Devices for Transient Testing,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1251 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1590072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. JENSEN et al., “Restart of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Neutron Radiography Program,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1325 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1605780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. JENSEN and A. FLEMING, “Development of Advanced Instrumentation for Transient Testing,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1354 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1627123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. BUMGARDNER and D. M. WACHS, “Restarting the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Reactor for Nuclear Transient Testing Science: A Special Issue of Nuclear Technology,” Nucl. Technol., 205, iv (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1650605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. HOLSCHUH et al., “Transient Reactor Test Facility Advanced Transient Shapes,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1346 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1559712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. L. POPE et al., “Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Design and Experiment Capability,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1378 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1599615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications, Vol. NQA-1, American Society of Mechanical Engineering, Standard (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications Addenda, Vol. NQA-1A, American Society of Mechanical Engineering, Standard (2009).
   Google Scholar
• W. J. OBERKAMPF and D. P. AESCHLIMAN, “Issues in Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Verification and Validation,” Aiaa J., 36, 5, 733 (1998); https://doi.org/10.2514/2.456.
   Google Scholar
• INL/EXT-13-29898, N. E. WOOLSTENHULME and J. D. WIEST, Eds., p. 76, Idaho National Laboratory (2013).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Technology Research and Development,” INL/EXT-19-55844, N. WOOLSTENHULME, Ed., Idaho National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. CARMACK, “Future Transient Testing of Advanced Fuels,” INL/EXT-09-16392, pp. 1–48, Idaho National Laboratory (2009).
   Google Scholar
• D. L. LaBRIER and W. R. MARCUM, presented at the American Nuclear Society Annual Mtg., San Francisco, California, Vol. 116, p. 1397 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• D. L. LaBRIER, W. R. MARCUM, and J. NYLANDER, presented at the American Nuclear Society Annual Mtg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vol. 116, p. 1113 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. L. LaBRIER et al., “On the Performance of the Transient Reactor Test Loop (TRTL),” Proc. American Nuclear Society Annual Mtg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vol. 118, p. 1130, American Nuclear Society (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. L. LaBRIER et al., Proc. 18th Int. Topl. Mtg. on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Vol. 18, pp. 4983–4993, American Nuclear Society, (2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Status Report on Development of TREAT Water Loop,” INL/EXT-19-55730, N. WOOLSTENHULME, Ed. pp. 1–43, Idaho National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. LEUNG, “Transient Critical Heat Flux and Blowdown Heat-Transfer Studies,” NUREG/CR-1559, Argonne National Lab (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Y. SIBAMOTO et al., “In-Pile Experiment in JMTR on the Radiation Induced Surface Activation (RISA) Effect on Flow-Boiling Heat Transfer,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 44, 2, 183 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. O. JERNKVIST and A. R. MASSIH, Eds., “Nuclear Fuel Behaviour Under Reactivity-Initiated Accident (RIA) Conditions,” Nuclear Energy Agency-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010).
   Google Scholar
• N. ZUBER, “Hydrodynamic Aspects of Boiling Heat Transfer,” PhD Thesis, University of California (1959).
   Google Scholar
• K. PASAMEHMETOGLU, “Transient Critical Heat Flux,” PhD Thesis, University of Central Florida (1986).
   Google Scholar
• V. BESSIRON, T. SUGIYAMA, and T. FUKETA, “Clad-to-Coolant Heat Transfer in NSRR Experiments,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 44, 723 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SAKURAI, “Mechanisms of Transitions to Film Boiling at CHFs in Subcooled and Pressurized Liquids due to Steady and Increasing Heat Inputs,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 197, 3, 301 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00314-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. S. KUTATELADZE, “Mechanisms of Transitions to Film Boiling at CHFs in Subcooled and Pressurized Liquids Due to Steady and Increasing Heat Inputs,” J. Tech. Phys., 20, 11, 1389 (1950).
   Google Scholar
• S. SAITO et al., “Development of In-Reactor Fuel Behavior Observation System,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 18, 6, 427 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1981.9733275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. LEE et al., “Comparison of Steady and Transient Flow Boiling Critical Heat Flux for FeCrAl Accident Tolerant Fuel Cladding Alloy, Zircaloy, and Inconel,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 132, 643 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Fuel Cycle Research & Development Advanced Fuels Campaign,” INL/LTD-15-36768, A. BEASLEY et al., Eds., Idaho National Laboratory (2015).
   Google Scholar
• N. TODREAS and M. KAZIMI, Nuclear Systems Volume I: Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals, CRC Press (2011).
   Google Scholar
• H. W. COLEMAN and W. G. STEELE, Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, 3rd ed.,John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey (2009).
   Google Scholar
• A. Z. MESQUITA and R. R. RODRIGUES, “Detection of the Departure from Nucleate Boiling in Nuclear Fuel Rod Simulators,” Int. J. Nucl. Energy, 2013, 1 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/950129.
   Google Scholar