Research on the Cognitive Reliability Model of DCS+SOP in the Ling’ao Phase II Nuclear Power Plant’s Main Control Room

References

• P. V. R. CARVALHO, I. L. DOS SANTOS, and M. C. R. VIDAL, “Safety Implications of Culture and Cognitive Issues in Nuclear Power Plant Operation,” Appl. Ergon., 37, 211 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. H. HE and X. R. HUANG, Human Reliability Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications in Industrial System, QingHua University Press, Beijing, China (2007) (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• N. STANTON, Human Factors in Nuclear Safety, Taylor & Francis Ltd (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Z. YICHUAN, “Research on the Effects of Information Display Characteristics on Operator’s Cognitive Behavior in a Digital Control System in Nuclear Power Plant,” Master^’s Thesis, University of South China (2016) (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• R. E. HALL, J. FRAGOLA, and J. WREATHALL, “Post Event Human Decision Errors: Operator Action Tree/Time Reliability Correlation,” NUREG/CR-3010, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1982).
   Google Scholar
• D. A. SEAVER and W. G. STILLWELL, “Procedures for Using Expert Judgement to Estimate Human Error Probabilities in Nuclear Power Plant Operations,” NUREG/CR-2743, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1983).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. EMBREY et al., “SLIM-MAUD an Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilitics Using Structured Expert Judgment,” NUREG/CR-3518. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1984).
   Google Scholar
• G. W. HANAMAN, A. J. SPURGIN, and Y. LUKIC, “Human Cognitive Reliability Model for PRA Analysis,” NUS24531, Draft EPRI Report, Electric Power Research Institute (1984).
   Google Scholar
• L. D. PHILIPS et al., “A Socio-Technical Approach to Assessing Human Reliability(STAHR),” Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation of the Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 Nuclear Power Plant, Appendix D, NUREG/CR-4022, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1995).
   Google Scholar
• A. N. BEARE et al., An Approach to Estimating the Probability of Failures in Detection, Diagnosis, and Decision Making Phase of Procedure-Guided Human Interactions, John Wiley and Sons (1990).
   Google Scholar
• P. C. CACCIABUE et al., “Cosimo: A Cognitive Simulation Model of Human Decision Making and Behaviour in Accident of Management of Complex Plants,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern IEEE-SMC, 22, 5, 1057 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. CORKER and B. SMITH, “An Architecture and Modeling for Cognitive Engineering Simulation Analysis: Application to Advanced Aviation Analysis,” Proc. 9th AAIA Conf. Computing in Aero Space, San Diego, California (1993).
   Google Scholar
• K. SASOU et al., “Modelling and Simulation of Operator Team Behaviour in Nuclear Power plants,” Proc. HCI Int., p. 95, Tokyo (1995).
   Google Scholar
• J. RASMUSSEN, Information Processes and Human Machine interaction—An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, ELseVier NorthHolland (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Q. STRAETER, “Buerteiling der menschlichen zuverlaessigkeit auf der basis von betreibserfahung,” Dissertation an der Technischen Universitat, Munchen, GRS-138 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• E. HOLLNAGEL, Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method, ElsevierScience Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom (1998).
   Google Scholar
• A. BIRK, H. KENN, and T. WALLE, “Robocube a “Universal” “Special-Purpose” Hardware for the Robocup Small Robots League,” Distrib. Auton. Rob. Syst., 3, 331 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72198-4_32.
   Google Scholar
• D. MARTIN, A. CHEYER, and D. MORAN, “The Open Agent Architecture: A Framework for Building Distributed Software Systems,” Artif. Intell. Appl., 13, 1–2, 91 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1080/088395199117504.
   Google Scholar
• M. TAMBE, “Towards Flexible Teamwork,” J. AI Res., 7, 83 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.433.
   Google Scholar
• Y. SHU, K. FUTURA, and S. KONDO, “Team Performance Modelling for HRA in Dynamic Situation,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 78, 111 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00111-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. NELSON and G. W. COTTRELL, “A Probabilistic Model of Eye Movements in Concept Formation,” presented at the 3rd Int. Conf. Dev Learn., 70, 13–15, 2256 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• A. KHRENNIKOV, “Quantum-Like Model of Cognitive Decision Making and Information Processing,” Biosystems, 95, 3, 179 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-C. LEE and P.-H. SEONG, “A Computational Model for Evaluating the Effects of Attention, Memory, and Mental Models on Situation Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Operators,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94, 11, 1796 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. L. BORING, “A Weighted CREAM Model for Maritime Human Reliability Analysis,” Procedia Manuf., 3, 1335 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.289.
   Google Scholar
• Q. ZHOU et al., “A Fuzzy and Bayesian Network CREAM Model for Human Reliability Analysis—The Case of Tanker Shipping,” Saf. Sci., 105, 149 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. YI-QUN et al., “The Reliability Simulative Study of Collaboration Behaviour Way for Team Layouts in Digital Main Control Room of Nuclear Power Plant,” J. Univ. South China (Social Science Edition), 16, 6, 8 (2015) (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Z. LI et al., “The Effects of Digital State-Oriented Procedures on Human Error of Nuclear Power Plant,” Chin. J. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 37, 3, 427 (2017) (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• E. EDWARDS, Human Factors in Aviation, Academic Press, London (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Z. LI, Human Reliability of Digitalized Nuclear Power Plants, National Defense Industry Press of China (2019) (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• G. W. HANNAMAN, A. J. SPURGIN, and Y. LUKIC, “Human Cognitive Reliability Model for PRA Analysis,” NUS-4531, Electric Power Research Institute (1984).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. EMBREY, “SLIM-MAUD: A Computer-Based Technique for Human Reliability Assessment,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 3, 1, 5 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1108/eb002855.
   Google Scholar
• E. HOUNAGEL, Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis method (CREAM), Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom (1998).
   Google Scholar
• F. FRUGGIERO et al., “The Role of Human Fatigue in the Uncertainty of Measurement,” Procedia Manuf., 13, 1320:1327 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.092.
   Google Scholar
• I.-M. DRAGAN and A. ISAIC-MANIU, “The Reliability of the Human Factor,” Procedia Econ. Finance, 15, 1486 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00615-7.
   Google Scholar
• N. VALENTINA DI PASQUALE et al., “A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA),” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 139, 17 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. R. BLISCHKE and D. N. P. MURTHY, Reliability: Modeling, Prediction and Optimization, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, New York (2000).
   Google Scholar
• D. GERTMAN et al., “The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method,” NUREG/CR-6883, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2005).
   Google Scholar
• G. W. HANNAMAN, A. J. SPURGIN, and Y. D. LUKIC, “A Model for Assessing Human Cognitive Reliability in PRA studies,” Proc IEEE 3rd Conf. on Human Factors and Nuclear Safety, Monterey, California (1985).
   Google Scholar
• T. KONTOGIANNIS and V. MOUSTAKIS, “An Experimental Evaluation of Comprehensibility Aspects of Knowledge Structures Derived Through Induction Technique: A Case Study of Industrial False Diagnosis,” Behav. Inf. Technol., 21, 2, 117 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290210146728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. NORDBY, R. K. RAANAS, and S. MAGNUSSEN, “Keying Briefly Presented Multiple-Digit Numbers,” Behav. Inf. Technol., 21, 1, 27 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290210121879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. FISCHER and U. DOHERTY, “Adaptively Shortened Pull-Down Menus: Location Knowledge and Selection Efficiency,” Behav. Inf. Technol., 27, 5, 439 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701497095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. WIEDENBECK, “The Use of Icons and Labels in an End-User Application Program: An Empirical Study of Learning and Retention,” Behav. Inf. Technol., 18, 2, 68 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999119129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. J. WESTERMANN et al., “Age and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Computerized Information Retrieval,” Behav. Inf. Technol., 14, 5, 313 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299508914650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. D. SWAIN and H. E. GUTTMANN, Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, 20555, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1983).
   Google Scholar
• L. J. KECKLUND and O. SVENSON, “Human Errors and Work Performance in a Nuclear Power Plan Control Room: Association with Work-Related Factors and Behavioral Coping,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 56, 5 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00137-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. J. CHANG and A. MOSLEH, “Cognitive Modeling and Dynamic Probabilistic Simulation of Operating Crew Response to Complex System Accidents. Part 2: IDAC Performance Influencing Factors Model,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92, 8, 1014 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. J. CHANG and A. MOSLEH, “Cognitive Modeling and Dynamic Probabilistic Simulation of Operating Crew Response to Complex System Accidents. Part 4: IDAC Causal Model of Operator Problem-Solving Response,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92, 8, 1061 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. I. GERTMAN et al., “INTENT: A Method for Estimating Human Error Probabilities for Decision Based Errors,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 35, 127 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(92)90032-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. BARNES, D. BLEY, and S. COOPER, “Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for a Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA),” NUREG1624, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2000).
   Google Scholar
• S. W. LEE et al., “Development of a Qualitative Evaluation Framework for Performance Shaping Factors (PSFs) in Advanced MCR HRA,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38, 8, 1751 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. CHEN et al., “Evidential Analytic Hierarchy Process Dependence Assessment Methodology in Human Reliability Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 123 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. LIU et al., “Expert Judgments for Performance Shaping Factors Multiplier Design in Human Reliability Analysis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 194, 106343 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar