Market Basis for Salt-Cooled Reactors: Dispatchable Heat, Hydrogen, and Electricity with Assured Peak Power Capacity

References

• C. ANDREADES et al., “Design Summary of the Mark-I Pebble-Bed, Fluoride Salt-Cooled, High-Temperature Reactor Commercial Power Plant,” Nucl. Technol., 195, 3, 223 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG et al., “Fusion Blankets and Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactors with Flibe Salt Coolant: Common Challenges, Tritium Control, and Opportunities for Synergistic Development Strategies Between Fission, Fusion and Solar Technologies,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 1778 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1691400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy, T. J. DOLAN, Ed., Elsevier (June 2017); https://www.elsevier.com/books/molten-salt-reactors-and-thorium-energy/dolan/978-0-08-101126-3 (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. PETROSKI and L. WOOD, “Sustainable, Full-Scope Nuclear Fission Energy at Planetary Scale,” Sustainability, 4, 3088 (2012); https://doi.org/10.3390/su4113088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Energy Flow Charts,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2020); https://flowcharts.llnl.gov/commodities/energy ( 2018) ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “In 2016, U.S. Energy Expenditures per Unit GDP Were the Lowest Since at Least 1970,” in “Today In Energy,”Monthly Energy Review and State Energy Data System, U.S. Information Agency; https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36754 ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis—Version 12.0” (Nov. 2018); https://www.lazard.com/media/450784/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-120-vfinal.pdf ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Energy and Renewables: System Effects in Low-Carbon Electrical Systems,” NEA 7056, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency; https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2012/7056-system-effects.pdf ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• V. SIVARAM and S. KANN, “Solar Power Needs a More Ambitious Cost Target,” Nat. Energy, 1, 16036 (Apr. 2016); https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. BUSHNELL and K. NOVAN, “Setting with the Sun: The Impacts of Renewable Energy on Wholesale Power Markets,” DEEP WP 020, UC Davis Energy Economics Program (May 2018); http://deep.ucdavis.edu/uploads/5/6/8/7/56877229/deep_wp020.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. SCHMALENSEE et al., “The Future of Solar Energy: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015); https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/MITEI-The-Future-of-Solar-Energy.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. D. MILLS et al., “Impact of Wind, Solar, and Other Factors on Wholesale Power Prices: An Historical Analysis—2008 Through 2017,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Nov. 2019); https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl_-_wind_and_solar_impacts_on_wholesale_prices_approved.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. BUONGIORNO et al., “The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon Constrained World,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018); http://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/The-Future-of-Nuclear-Energy-in-a-Carbon-Constrained-World.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• N. SEPULVED et al., “The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation,” Joule, 2, 11, 2403 (Nov. 21, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. BISTLINE, R. JAMES, and A. SOWDER, “Technology, Policy, and Market Drivers of (and Barriers to) Advanced Nuclear Reactor Deployment in the United States after 2030,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 8, 1075 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1574119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. D. TAPIA-AHUMADA et al., “Deep Decarbonization of the U.S. Electricity Sector: Is There a Role for Nuclear Power,” Report 338, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change (Sep. 2019); https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/MITJPSPGC_Rpt338.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• E. J. MONIZ et al., “The Future of Natural Gas,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011); http://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MITEI-The-Future-of-Natural-Gas.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. J. DAVIS et al., “Net-Zero Emissions Energy Systems,” Science, 360, eaas9793 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. H. GREEN et al., “Insights into Future Mobility,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2019); http://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Insights-into-Future-Mobility.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. BEDIR et al., “Staff Report – California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Projections 2017-2025,” CEC-600-2018-001, California Energy Commission (Mar. 2018); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70893.pdf). (current as of Dec. 12, 2019
   Google Scholar
• B. DALE et al., “Take a Closer Look: Biofuels Can Support Environmental, Economic and Social Goals,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 7200 (2014); https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es5025433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. E. DALE, “Feeding a Sustainable Chemical Industry: Do We Have the Bioproducts Cart Before the Feedstocks Horse?” Faraday Discuss., 202, 11 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00173H.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. DALE et al., “Biofuels Done Right: Land Efficient Animal Feeds Enable Large Environmental and Energy Benefits,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8385 (2010); https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es101864b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. HOLTZAPPLE, S. LONKAR, and C. GRANDA, “Producing Biofuels via the Carboxylate Platform,” Chem. Eng. Prog., 111, 3, 52 (Mar. 2015); https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sagar_Lonkar/publication/284745695_Producing_biofuels_via_the_carboxylate_platform/links/5b94930192851c78c4015785/Producing-biofuels-via-the-carboxylate-platform.pdf?origin=publication_detail (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Liquid Hydrogen Fuelled Aircraft—System Analysis,” Airbus Deutschland GmbH (2003); https://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/Scholz/dglr/hh/text_2004_02_26_Cryoplane.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• W. NUTTALL and A. T. BAKENNE, Fossil Fuel Hydrogen: Technical, Economic and Environmental Potential, Springer (2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Opportunities for Cogeneration with Nuclear Energy,” NP-T-4.1, International Atomic Energy Agency, (May 2017); https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P1749_web.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “U.S. DOE Combined Heat and Power Installation Database,” U.S. Department of Energy (2019); https://doe.icfwebservices.com/chpdb/ (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. J. FRIEDMANN, Z. FAN, and K. TANK, “Low-Carbon Heat Solutions for Heavy Industry: Sources, Options and Costs Today,” Columbia/SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy (Oct. 2019); https://energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/file-uploads/LowCarbonHeat-CGEP_Report_100219-2_0.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• L. M. MILLER and D. W. KEITH, “Observation-Based Solar and Wind Power Capacity Factors and Power Densities,” Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 104008 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, “Variable and Assured Peak Electricity Production from Base-Load Light-Water Reactors with Heat Storage and Auxiliary Combustible Fuels,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 377 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1518555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, P. SABHARWALL, and H. GOUGAR, “Heat Storage Coupled to Generation IV Reactors for Variable Electricity from Base-Load Reactors,” Workshop Proceedings, ANP-TR-185, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, INL/EXT-19-54909, Idaho National Laboratory (2019); https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1575201 (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Energy Storage Cost Analysis: 2017 Methods and Results,” Electric Power Research Institute (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Moltex Energy website (2020); https://www.moltexenergy.com/ (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. MEHOS et al., “Concentrated Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap,” NREL/TP-5500-67464, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Jan. 2017); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67464.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. ODENTHAL et al., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a 4 MWh High Temperature Molten Salt Thermocline Storage System with Filler,” Proc. 25th Annual SolarPACES Conf., Daegu, Korea, October 1–4, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, “Multi-Gigawatt-Day Low-Cost Crushed-Rock Heat Storage Coupled to Nuclear Reactors for Variable Electricity and Heat,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 122, 553 (2020); https://doi.org/10.13182/T122-32009.
   Google Scholar
• K. F. AMUDA and R. M. FIELD, “Proposed Heat Storage and Recovery Facility Designs for Korean Nuclear Power Plants Using Ultra Large Floating Barge,” Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Goyang, Korea, October 23–25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG, S. BRICK, and G. HARATYK, “Coupling Heat Storage to Nuclear Reactors for Variable Electricity Output with Base-Load Reactor Operation,” Electr. J., 31, 23 (Apr. 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2018.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Hydrogen Production Handbook, X. L. YAN and R. HINO, Eds., CRC Press (2011).
   Google Scholar
• N. MURADOV, “Low to Near-Zero CO2 Production of Hydrogen from Fossil Fuels: Status and Perspectives,” Int. J. Hydrogen, 42, 14058 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. FRICK et al., “Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Feasibility for a Light Water Reactor in the Midwest,” INL/EXT-19-55395, Idaho National Laboratory (Sep. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• B. D. JAMES, D. A. DeSANTIS, and G. SAUR, “Final Report: Hydrogen Production Pathways Cost Analysis (2013–2016),” DOE-StrategicAnalysis-6231-1, U.S. Department of Energy (Sep. 30, 2016); https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1346418 ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. E. O’BRIEN et al., “High-Temperature Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy—Technology Summary,” INL/EXT-09-16140, Idaho National Laboratory (Feb. 2010); https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/4480292.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. E. O’BRIEN, “Thermodynamics and Transport Phenomena in High Temperature Steam Electrolysis Cells,” J. Heat Transfer, 134, 031017–1 (Mar. 2012); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. L. YAN and H. SATO, “HTGR and Renewable Hybrid Energy System for Grid Stability – Assessment of Performance, Economics and CO2 Reduction,” Proc. IAEA Technical Mtg. Nuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems for Decarbonized Energy Production and Cogeneration, Vienna, Austria, October 22–25, 2018, International Atomic Energy Agency (2018).
   Google Scholar
• R. BOARDMAN et al., “Evaluation of Non-Electric Market Options for a Light-Water Reactor in the Midwest (Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program),” INL/EXT-19-55090, Idaho National Laboratory (Aug. 2019); https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1559965 (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• K. F. AMUDA and R. M. FIELD, “Nuclear Heat Storage and Recovery for the APR1400,” J. Storage Mater., 28 (Apr. 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101171.
   Google Scholar
• A. KLUBA and R. FIELD, “Optimization and Exergy Analysis of Nuclear Heat Storage and Recovery,” Energies, 12, 4205 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214205.
   Google Scholar
• A. M. KLUBA and R. M. FIELD, “Optimization for the Nuclear Heat Storage and Recovery Rankine Cycle,” Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 23–24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• K. F. AMUDA and R. M. FIELD, “Nuclear Heat Storage and Recovery in a Renewable Energy World,” Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 23–24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• A. M. KLUBA and R. M. FIELD, “Control System Considerations for APR1400 Integrated with Thermal Energy Storage,” Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Goyang, Korea, October 23–25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, P. J. McDANIEL, and B. ZOHURI, “Nuclear Air-Brayton Power Cycles with Thermodynamic Topping Cycles, Assured Peaking Capacity and Heat Storage for Variable Electricity and Heat,” Nucl. Technol. (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1785793.
   Google Scholar
• B. ZOHURI and P. McDANIEL, Advanced Smaller Modular Reactors: An Innovative Approach to Nuclear Power, 1st ed., Springer (2019); https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783030236816 (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• B. ZOHURI and P. McDANIEL, Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: An Innovative Design Approach, 2nd ed., Springer (2018); https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319705507 (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• B. ZOHURI, P. McDANIEL, and C. R. DE OLIVERIA, “Advanced Nuclear Open Air-Brayton Cycles for Highly Efficient Power Conversion,” Nucl. Technol., 192, 1, 48 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT14-42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. BOTHIEN and A. CIANI, “Sequential Combustion of Hydrogen for Carbon-Free Dispatchable Power Generation from Gas Turbines,” Mech. Eng., 141, 12, 46 (Dec. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Hydrogen-Capable Gas Turbines for Deep Decarbonization,” Electric Power Research Institute (Nov. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG et al., “Converting Excess Low-Priced Electricity into High-Temperature Stored Heat for Industry and High-Value Electricity Production,” Electr. J., 30, 42 (July 2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2017.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• D. C. STACK, D. CURTIS, and C. FORSBERG, “Performance of Firebrick Resistance-Heated Energy Storage for Industrial Heat Applications and Round-Trip Electricity Storage,” Appl. Energy, 242, 782 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. LI et al., “Combined-Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant Integration with Cascaded Latent Heat Thermal Storage for Fast Dynamic Responses,” Energy Convers. Manage., 183, 1 (Mar. 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. K. DROST et al., “Thermal Energy Storage for Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants,” PNL-7403, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (July 1990); https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6624383 (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. SHINNAR and H. BINDRA, “Thermal Energy Storage for Combined Cycle Power Plants,” WO2012150969A1, World Intellectual Property Organization (2012); https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2012150969A1 ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “High-Temperature Heat Storage Systems for Flexible CCGT Power Plants,” Kraftwerk Forschung; https://kraftwerkforschung.info/en/high-temperature-heat-storage-systems-for-flexible-ccgt-power-plans/ ( current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Shell Scenarios SKY: Meeting the Goals of Paris Agreement,” Shell Oil Company (2019); https://www.shell.com/promos/business-customers-promos/download-latest-scenario-sky/_jcr_content.stream/1530643931055/eca19f7fc0d20adbe830d3b0b27bcc9ef72198f5/shell-scenario-sky.pdf (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “The Future of Hydrogen: Seizing Today’s Opportunities,” International Energy Agency (June 2019); https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen (current as of Dec. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar