https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7987-8980
References
- “Safety Goals for the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants: Policy Statement,” 51 FR 30028, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Aug. 1986).
- “Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plant Operation,” NUREG-0880, Rev. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (May 1983).
- “Implementation of the Safety Goals,” Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) on the Commission Paper (SECY) 89-102, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Jun. 1990).
- “Elevation of the Core Damage Frequency Objective to a Fundamental Commission Safety Goal,” Paper (SECY) 97-208, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Sep. 1997).
- “Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants,” Final Summary Report, Report NUREG-1150, Vol. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dec. 1990).
- “Individual Plant Examination Program: Perspectives on Reactor Safety and Plant Performance,” NUREG-1560, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dec. 1997).
- “Individual Plant Examination for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities,” 10 CFR §50.54(f) Letter Request, Generic Letter Request 88-20, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 1988).
- “Feasibility Study for a Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Regulatory Structure for Future Plant Licensing: Appendices A Through L,” NUREG-1860, Vol. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dec. 2007).
- “Evaluation of Severe Accident Risks: Surry Unit 1, Main Report,” NUREG/CR-4551, Vol. 3, Rev. 1, Part 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 1990).
- “Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants,” NUREG-75-014 (WASH-1400), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 1975).
- “Safety and Operational Benefits of Risk-Informed Initiatives,” EPRI 1016308, Electric Power Research Institute (Feb. 2008).
- “State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Report,” NUREG-1935, Vol. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 2012).
- “State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Project: Sequoyah Integrated Deterministic and Uncertainty Analyses,” NUREG/CR-7245, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 2019).
- “Position Statement of the Health Physics Society – Radiation Risk in Perspective,” Position Paper PS010-1, Health Physics Society (Jan. 1996).
- M. TUBIANA et al., “The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data,” Radiology, 251, 1, 13 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080671.
- A. AURENGO et al., “Dose-Effect Relationships and Estimation of the Carcinogenic Effects of Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation,” Académie des Sciences & Académie Nationale de Médecine; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.1681&rep=rep1&type=pdf (current as of Feb. 15, 2020).
- “Health Effects of Low-Level Radiation,” Position Statement #41, American Nuclear Society; http://cdn.ans.org/pi/ps/docs/ps41.pdf ( current as of Feb. 15, 2020).
- “Draft Regulatory Basis for Containment Protection and Release Reduction for Mark I and Mark II Boiling Water Reactors (10 CFR Part 50),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Sep. 2015).
- “Technical Basis for Severe Accident Mitigating Strategies: Volume 1,” EPRI 3002003301, Electric Power Research Institute (Apr. 2015).
- “An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis,” Regulatory Guide 1.174, Rev. 3, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2018).