References
- J. GARRICK, “Lessons Learned from 21 Nuclear Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments,” Nucl. Technol., 84, 3, 319 (1989); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34216.
- “NUREG/CR-1150: Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment For Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants Final Summary Report,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2005).
- “NUREG/CR-7110: State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project. Volume 1: Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012).
- “NUREG/CR-7110: State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project. Volume 2: Surry Integrated Analysis,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012).
- J. C. LEE and N. J. McCORMICK, Risk and Safety Analysis of Nuclear Systems, Wiley-Blackwell (2011).
- T. ALDEMIR, “A Survey of Dynamic Methodologies for Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 53, 113 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.001.
- “NEI 12-06: Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide (Rev. 4),” Nuclear Energy Institute (2012).
- J. DEVOOGHT, “Dynamic Reliability,” in Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 25, p. 215 (1997).
- J. DEVOOGHT and C. SMIDTS, “Probabilistic Reactor Dynamics—I: The Theory of Continuous Event Trees,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 111, 3, 229 (1992); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23937.
- B. RUTT et al., “Distributed Dynamic Event Tree Generation for Reliability and Risk Assessment,” Proc. 2006 IEEE Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments, Paris, France, pp. 61–70 (2006).
- E. HOFER et al., “An Approximate Epistemic Uncertainty Analysis Approach in the Presence of Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 77, 3, 229 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00056-X.
- K. S. HSUEH and A. MOSLEH, “The Development and Application of the Accident Dynamic Simulator for Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 52, 3, 297 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00140-9.
- G. COJAZZI, “The DYLAM Approach for the Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Systems,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 52, 3, 279 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00139-5.
- A. ALFONSI et al., “RAVEN and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Software Overview,” Proc. European Safety and Reliability Conf. (ESREL 2014), Wroklaw, Poland, September 14–18, 2014.
- S. GUARRO, M. YAU, and M. MOTAMED, “NUREG/CR-6465: Development of Tools for Safety Analysis of Control Software in Advanced Reactors,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1996).
- T. ALDEMIR, “Utilization of the Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique to Construct Markov Failure Models for Process Control Systems,” Proc. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM3), Los Angeles, California (1991).
- RELAP5-3D CODE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, “RELAP5-3D Code Manual,” Technical Report, Idaho National Laboratory (2005).
- R. O. GAUNTT, “MELCOR Computer Code Manual, Version 1.8.5, Vol. 2, Rev. 2,” NUREG/CR-6119, Sandia National Laboratories (2000).
- D. MANDELLI et al., “BWR Station Blackout: A RISMC Analysis Using RAVEN and RELAP5-3D,” Nucl. Technol., 193, 1, 161 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT14-142.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “Measuring Risk-Importance in a Dynamic PRA Framework,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 128, 160 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.12.035.
- T. ALDEMIR et al., “Probabilistic Risk Assessment Modeling of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems Using Two Dynamic Methodologies,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 95, 10, 1011 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.04.011.
- Z. K. JANKOVSKY, M. R. DENMAN, and T. ALDEMIR, “Dynamic Importance Measures in the ADAPT Framework,” Proc. American Nuclear Society, 115, 799 (2016).
- O. NUSBAUMER and A. RAUZY, “Fault Tree Linking Versus Event Tree Linking Approaches: A Reasoned Comparison,” J. Risk Reliab., 227, 3, 315 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X13490260
- E. ZIO et al., “A Concept Paper On Dynamic Reliability via Monte Carlo Simulation,” Math. Comput. Simul., 47, 2–5, 371 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(98)00112-8.
- A. PETRUZZI and F. D’AURIA, “Thermal-Hydraulic System Codes in Nuclear Reactor Safety and Qualification Procedures,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins., 2008, 3152326 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/460795.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “Multi-Unit Dynamic PRA,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 185, 303 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.029.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “Mining Data in a Dynamic PRA Framework,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 108, 99 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.05.004.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “Scenario Clustering and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 115, 146 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.013.
- “Technical Framework for Management of Safety Margins—Loss of Main Feedwater Pilot Application,” EPRI Technical Report 1023032, Electric Power Research Institute (2011).
- R. R. SHERRY, J. R. GABOR, and S. M. HESS, “Pilot Application of Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization to a Total Loss of Feedwater Event,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 117, 65 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.018.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “Modeling of a Flooding Induced Station Blackout for a Pressurized Water Reactor Using the RISMC Toolkit,” Proc. PSA 2015 Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Sun Valley, April 26–30, 2015.
- T. ALDEMIR et al., “Methodologies for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Digital Reactor Protection and Control Systems,” Nucl. Technol., 159, 2, 167 (2007); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3863.
- J. K. VAURIO, “A Recursive Method for Breaking Complex Logic Loops in Boolean System Models,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92, 10, 1473 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.09.020.
- Z. JANKOVSKY, M. R. DENMAN, and T. ALDEMIR, “Dynamic Event Tree Analysis with the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 Safety Analysis Code,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 115, 55 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.01.001.
- C. RABITI et al., “RAVEN, A New Software for Dynamic Risk Analysis,” Proc. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM) 12, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 22–27, 2014.
- J. C. HELTON et al., “Representation of Analysis Results Involving Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty,” Technical Report SAND2008-4379, Sandia National Laboratories (2008).
- A. AMENDOLA and G. REINA, “DYLAM-1, a Software Package for Event Sequence and Consequence Spectrum Methodology,” EUR-924, CEC-JRC, ISPRA, Commission of the European Communities (1984).