A New Method to Efficiently Estimate the Equilibrium State of Pebble Bed Reactors

References

• K. J. KRUEGER and G. P. IVENS, “Safety-Related Experiences with the AVR Reactor,” presented at the Specialists’ Mtg. on Safety and Accid. Anal. for Gas-Cooled Reactors, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, May 13–15, 1985, p. 61 ( IAEA-TECDOC-358) ( 1985).
   Google Scholar
• G. STRYDOM et al., “The OECD/NEA/NSC PBMR 400 MW Coupled Neutronics Thermal Hydraulics Transient Benchmark: Transient Results,” presented at PHYSOR 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9–14, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Z. WU, D. LIN, and D. ZHONG, “The Design Features of the HTR-10,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 218, 1–3, 25 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00182-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. T. CISNEROS et al., “Technical Description of the “Mark 1” Pebble-Bed Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (PB-FHR) Power Plant,” Tech. Rep., University of California, Berkeley, Department of Nuclear Engineering, (2014).
   Google Scholar
• E. BLANDFORD et al., “Kairos Power Thermal Hydraulics Research and Development,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 364, 110636 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. WU and R. E. WILLIAMS, “A Fast and Self-Consistent Approach for Multi-cycle Equilibrium Core Studies Using Monte Carlo Models,” presented at the Joint Int. Conf. on Math. and Comput. (M&C), Supercomputing in Nucl. Appl. (SNA) and the Monte Carlo (MC) Method, Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Z. WU et al., “A Core Design for a Small Modular Boiling Water Reactor with Long-Life Core,” Nucl. Technol., 193, 3, 364 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT15-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. D. GOUGAR, F. REITSMA, and W. JOUBERT, “A Comparison of Pebble Mixing and Depletion Algorithms Used in Pebble-Bed Reactor Equilibrium Cycle Simulation,” Proc. 2009 Int. Conf. on Math., Comput. Methods, and Reactor Phys., Saratoga Springs, New York, May 3–7, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Z. WU et al., “Neutronics and Safety Studies on a Research Reactor Concept for an Advanced Neutron Source,” Nucl. Technol., 199, 1, 67 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1335146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. ZHENG, L. SHI, and Y. DONG, “Thermohydraulic Transient Studies of the Chinese 200MWe HTR-PM for Loss of Forced Cooling Accidents,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 36, 6, 742 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. REITSMA, “The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Layout and Neutronics Design of the Equilibrium Cycle,” Proc. Phys. of Fuel Cycles and Adv. Nuc. Syst.: Global Develop. (PHYSOR 2004), Chicago, Illinois, April 25–29, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• A. XHONNEU, D. LAMBERTZ, and H.-J. ALLELEIN, “The Enhanced Fuel Management Models of the HTR Code Package (HCP) Module SHUFLE,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 329, 177 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.11.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. SHE et al., “PANGU Code for Pebble-Bed HTGR Reactor Physics and Fuel Cycle Simulations,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 126, 48 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. ORTENSI and P. BALESTRA, “Initial Study on Cross Section Generation Requirements for a PBR Equilibrium Core,” INL/EXT-21-64242, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. TEUCHERT, U. HANSEN, and K. HAAS, “VSOP—Computer Code System for Reactor Physics and Fuel Cycle Simulation,” Kernforschungsanlage Jülich, JÜL-1649 (Mar. 1980).
   Google Scholar
• W. K. TERRY, H. D. GOUGAR, and A. M. OUGOUAG, “Direct Deterministic Method for the Deterministic Design, Analysis, and Optimization of the In-core Fuel Cycle of a Recirculating Pebble-Bed Reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 29, 11, 1345 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(01)00110-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. LU et al., “Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuel in Prismatic High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors: Analysis of Reactor Performance and Safety Characteristics,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 114, 277 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. LU and N. R. BROWN, “Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuel in Prismatic High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors: Design Basis Accidents and Fuel Cycle Cost,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 347, 108 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. BOMBONI et al., “Comparison Among MCNP-Based Depletion Codes Applied to Burnup Calculations of Pebble-Bed HTR Lattices,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 240, 4, 918 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. NAGAYA et al., “MVP/GMVP II: General Purpose Monte Carlo Codes for Neutron and Proton Transport Calculations Based on Continuous Energy and Multigroup Methods,” Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (2005).
   Google Scholar
• T. SETIADIPURA and T. OBARA, “Development of Monte Carlo–Based Pebble Bed Reactor Fuel Management Code,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 71, 313 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “MCNP—A General Monte Carlo N-particle Transport Code,” Version 5, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2003).
   Google Scholar
• M. FRATONI and E. GREENSPAN, “Equilibrium Core Composition Search Methodologies for Pebble Bed Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 166, 1 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. T. CISNEROS, “Pebble Bed Reactors Design Optimization Methods and Their Application to the Pebble Bed Fluoride Salt Cooled High Temperature Reactor (PB-FHR),” PhD Dissertation, Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Y. WANG et al., “A Pebble Tracking Transport Algorithm for Pebble Bed Reactor Analysis,” Proc. PHYSOR 2018, Cancun, Mexico, April 22–26, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Y. TANG et al., “Analysis of the Pebble Burnup Profile in a Pebble-Bed Nuclear Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 345, 233 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. GARIAZZO, D. CHOJNOWSKI, and S. CHIRAYATH, “Nuclear Material Control and Accountancy Approach for Pebble Fueled Reactors Using a Novel Pebble-type Identification and Classification Technology,” ANL/SSS-21/13, Argonne National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. J. MULDER and W. A. BOYES, “Neutronics Characteristics of a 165MWth Xe-100 Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 357, 110415 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. LEPPÄNEN et al., “The Serpent Monte Carlo Code: Status, Development and Applications in 2013,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 142 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. C. DIFILIPPO, “Monte Carlo Calculations of Pebble Bed Benchmark Configurations of the PROTEUS Facility,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 143, 3, 240 (2003); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE02-34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. DAI et al., “Corrosion of Incoloy 800H Alloys with Nickel Cladding in FLiNaK Salts at 850°C,” Corros. Sci., 133, 349 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. LU et al., “A Direct Comparison of High-Order and Low-Order Neutronics Calculations of the 165MWth Xe-100 Reactor,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 124, 1, 563 (2021); https://doi.org/10.13182/T124-35627.
   Google Scholar
• “Equilibrium Core Concentrations,” Kairos Power (2021); https://kairospower.com/generic-fhr-core-model/ (accessed Aug. 15, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. J. MULDER, “VSOP-A: Code System for Simulating Aspects of the Reactor Physics and Fuel Cycle,” MulTech Report MTR-001 (2019).
   Google Scholar