P2M Simulation Exercise on Past Fuel Melting Irradiation Experiments

References

• OECD/NEA FIDES website, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency; https://oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_15313/framework-for-irradiation-experiments-fides.
   Google Scholar
• A. BAIN, “The Heat Rating Required to Produce Central Melting in Various UO2 Fuels,” Proc. Symp. Radiation Effects in Refractory Fuel Compounds, ASTM International (1962).
   Google Scholar
• J. ROBERTSON et al., “Temperature Distribution in UO2 Fuel Elements,” J. Nucl. Mater., 7, 3, 225 (1962); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(62)90243-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. DE HALAS and G. HORN, “Evolution of Uranium Dioxide Structure During Irradiation of Fuel Rods,” J. Nucl. Mater., 8, 2, 207 (1963); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(63)90036-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. FRESHLEY, “Operation with Fuel Melting,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 21, 2, 254 (1972); https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(72)90076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. JOSEPH, J. ROYER, and M. GROSGEORGE, “Transient Behaviour of Fragema Fuel Rods Previously Irradiaited Under Commerical Reactor Operating Conditions,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. LWR Fuel Performance, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1988, p. 17, American Nuclear Society (1988).
   Google Scholar
• R. VAN NIEUWENHOVE and S. SOLSTAD, “In-Core Fuel Performance and Material Characterization in the Halden Reactor,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 57, 2683 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2010.2050701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. BOER and M. VERWERFT, “Qualification of the New Pressurized Water Capsule (PWC) for Fuel Testing at BR2,” Proc. European Research Reactor Conf. (RRFM 2021), Helsinki, Finland, September 26–30, 2021, European Nuclear Society (2021).
   Google Scholar
• B. MICHEL et al., “Simulation of Pellet-Cladding Interaction with the PLEIADES Fuel Performance Software Environment,” Nucl. Technol., 182, 2, 124 (2013); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A16424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. SERCOMBE et al., “Modelling of Pellet Cladding Interaction,” Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, R. KONINGS and R. STOLLER, Eds., Elsevier, Oxford (2020).
   Google Scholar
• B. MICHEL et al., “Two Fuel Performance Codes of the PLEIADES Platform: ALCYONE and GERMINAL,” Nuclear Power Plant Design and Analysis Codes, p. 207, Elsevier (2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. MAGNI et al., “The TRANSURANUS Fuel Performance Code,” Nuclear Power Plant Design and Analysis Codes, p. 161, Elsevier (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. BARON et al., “CYRANO3: The EDF Fuel Performance Code Especially Designed for Engineering Applications,” Proc. Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting (WRFPM 2008), Seoul, Korea, 2008, Paper No. 8032.
   Google Scholar
• R. LARGENTON and G. THOUVENIN, “CYRANO3: The EDF Fuel Performance Code—Global Overview and Recent Developments on Fission Gas Modelling,” Proc. Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting (WRFPM 2014), Sendai, Japan, September 14–17 2014, Paper No. 100032.
   Google Scholar
• U. ENGMAN, “Step Ramp Test of the PWR Test Rod xM3 with ZIRLO Radial Texture,” Technical Report 146, STUDSVIK-SCIP-II (2012).
   Google Scholar
• V. ARIMESCU et al., “Third SCIP Modeling Workshop: Beneficial Impact of Slow Power Ramp on PCI Performance,” Proc. Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting (WRFPM 2014), Sendai, Japan, September 14–17 2014, Paper No. 100045.
   Google Scholar
• P. BLANPAIN, “HBC Task 3 Power-to-Melt Experiment,” HBC 89/10 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• G. BONNY et al., “Re-Evaluation of a Power-to-Melt Experiment Performed in the High Burnup Chemistry International Program,” Nucl. Technol. (October 2022) ( submitted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• H.-U. ZWICKY, “Post-Irradiation Examinations of Ramped Rodlets xM1,xM2 and xM3,” Technical Report 140, STUDSVIK-SCIP-II (2012).
   Google Scholar
• V. D’AMBROSI et al., “Presentation of the xM3 Test Case of the P2M Simulation Exercise and Modeling with the Fuel Performance Code ALCYONE” (Dec. 2022) (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• M. INOUE et al., “Power-to-Melts of Uranium–Plutonium Oxide Fuel Pins at a Beginning-of-Life Condition in the Experimental Fast Reactor JOYO,” J. Nucl. Mater., 323, 1, 108 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. SENS, “The Kinetics of Pore Movement in UO2 Fuel Rods,” J. Nucl. Mater., 43, 3, 293 (1972); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(72)90061-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. BAKER and R. LEGGETT, “Early-in-Life Thermal Performance of UO2–PuO2 Fast Reactor Fuel,” Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory (1979).
   Google Scholar
• D. FREUND, D. GEITHOFF, and H. STEINER, “Evaluation of the Power-to-Melt Experiments POTOM,” J. Nucl. Mater., 204, 228 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(93)90221-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. VANCE and P. MILLETT, “Phase-Field Simulations of Pore Migration and Morphology Change in Thermal Gradients,” J. Nucl. Mater., 490, 299 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.04.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. SCHUSTER and W. ZIMMERER, “Darstellung der stoffdaten des systems MAPLIB in tabellarischer und graphischer form,” KFK 1792, Gesellschaft für Kernforschung mbH (1973).
   Google Scholar
• A. MAGNI et al., “Modelling and Assessment of Thermal Conductivity and Melting Behaviour of MOX Fuel for Fast Reactor Applications,” J. Nucl. Mater., 541, 152410 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MAGNI et al., “Modelling of Thermal Conductivity and Melting Behaviour of Minor Actinide-MOX Fuels and Assessment Against Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Data,” J. Nucl. Mater., 557, 153312 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. DI MARCELLO et al., “Modelling Actinide Redistribution in Mixed Oxide Fuel for Sodium Fast Reactors,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 72, 83 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. GEELHOOD et al., “FRAPCON-4.0: A Computer Code for the Calculation of Steady-State, Thermal-Mechanical Behavior of Oxide Fuel Rods for High Burnup,” PNNL-19418, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2015).
   Google Scholar
• K. GEELHOOD et al., “FRAPTRAN-2.0: A Computer Code for the Transient Analysis of Oxide Fuel Rods,” PNNL-19400, Rev.2, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. HAGRMAN, G. REYMANN, and G. MASON, “MATPRO-Version11, A Handbook of Materials Properties for Use in the Analysis of Light Water Reactor Fuel Rod Behavior,” NUREG/CR-0497, TREE-1280, Rev.3, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (1979).
   Google Scholar
• W. LUSCHER and K. GEELHOOD, “Material Property Correlations: Comparisons Between FRAPCON-3.4, FRAPTRAN 1.4, and MATPRO,” PNNL-19417, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2010).
   Google Scholar
• “FAST Fuel Performance Code”; https://fast.labworks.org/.
   Google Scholar
• K. GEELHOOD et al., “MatLib-1.0: Nuclear Material Properties Library,” PNNL 29728, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• H. LOUKUSA, J. PELTONEN, and V. VALTAVIRTA, “FINIX—Fuel Behavior Model and Interface for Multi-Physics Applications—Code Documentation for Version 1.19.1,” VTT-R-00052-19, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (2019).
   Google Scholar
• L. JERNKVIST and A. MASSIH, “Assessment of Core Failure Limits for Light Water Reactor Under Reactivity Initiated Accidents,” Technical Report 2005:16, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (2004).
   Google Scholar
• OpenCalphad Software website; http://www.opencalphad.com/.
   Google Scholar
• C. INTRONI, J. SERCOMBE, and B. SUNDMAN, “Development of a Robust, Accurate and Efficient Coupling Between PLEIADES/ALCYONE 2.1 Fuel Performance Code and the OpenCalphad Thermo-Chemical Solver,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 369, 110818 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Thermodynamics Advanced Fuels—International Database,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2013); https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/taf-id/.
   Google Scholar
• A. CHAIEB et al., “Computational Assessment of LOCA Simulation Tests on High Burnup Fuel Rods in Halden and Studsvik Using CYRANO3 Code,” Proc. TopFuel, Santander, Spain, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• “TESPA-ROD Code”; https://www.grs.de/en/research-and-assessment/reactor-safety/tespa-rod-temperature-strain-and-pressure-analysis-fuel-rod.
   Google Scholar
• Y. UDAGAWA and M. AMAYA, “Model Updates and Performance Evaluations on Fuel Performance Code FEMAXI-8 for Light Water Reactor Fuel Analysis,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 56, 6, 461 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2019.1595766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. CHRISTENSEN, “Stoichiometry Effects in Oxide Nuclear Fuels. I. Power Rating Required for Melting and Oxygen Redistribution in Molten Center of UO2±x Fuels,” Battelle-Northwest, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1967).
   Google Scholar
• S. YAMANOUCHI et al., “Melting Temperature of Irradiated UO2 and UO2-2wt%Gd2O3 Fuel Pellets up to Burnup of About 30 GWd/tU,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 25, 6, 528 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1988.9733625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. WILLIAMSON et al., “Multidimensional Multiphysics Simulation of Nuclear Fuel Behavior,” J. Nucl. Mater., 423, 1–3, 149 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. YAGNIK et al., “Fuel Analysis and Licensing Code: FALCON MOD01, Volume 1: Theoretical and Numerical Base,” Technical Report 1011307, Electric Power Research Institute (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Fuel Industry Research Program; https://www.epri.com/portfolio/programs/108031.
   Google Scholar
• G. KHVOSTOV, “Modeling of Central Void Formation in LWR Fuel Pellets Due to High-Temperature Restructuring,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 50, 7, 1190 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. CHRISTENSEN, “Irradiation Effects on Uranium Dioxide Melting,” General Electric Company Hanford Atomic Products Operation (1962).
   Google Scholar
• M. ADAMSON, E. AITKEN, and R. CAPUTI, “Experimental and Thermodynamic Evaluation of the Melting Behavior of Irradiated Oxide Fuels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 130, 349 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(85)90323-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. CARBAJO et al., “A Review of the Thermophysical Properties of MOX and UO2 Fuels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 299, 3, 181 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00692-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. GERMAIN et al., “Modeling High Burnup Fuel Thermochemistry, Fission Product Release and Fuel Melting During the VERDON 1 and RT6 Tests,” J. Nucl. Mater., 561, 153527 (2022).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. GUÉNEAU et al., “TAF-ID: An International Thermodynamic Database for Nuclear Fuels Applications,” Calphad, 72, 102212 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.102212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. FINK, “Thermophysical Properties of Uranium Dioxide,” J. Nucl. Mater., 279, 1, 1 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00273-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. LEWIS et al., “Overview of Experimental Programs on Core Melt Progression and Fission Product Release Behaviour,” J. Nucl. Mater., 380, 1, 126 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. JERNKVIST, “Computational Assessment of Burnup-Dependent Fuel Failure Thresholds for Reactivity Initiated Accidents,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 43, 5, 546 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2006.9711133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. MACDONALD et al. “Response of Unirradiated and Irradiated PWR Fuel Rods Tested Under Power-Cooling-Mismatch Conditions,” Nucl. Saf., 19, 4.
   Google Scholar
• J. ARBORELIUS et al., “Advanced Doped UO2 Pellets in LWR Applications,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 43, 9, 967 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2006.9711184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. NONON et al., “PCI Behaviour of Chromium Oxide-Doped Fuel,” Proc. Pellet-Clad Interaction in Water Reactor Fuels, Aix-en-Provence, France, 2004, p. 305 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. NOVASCONE et al., “Modeling Porosity Migration in LWR and Fast Reactor MOX Fuel Using the Finite Element Method,” J. Nucl. Mater., 508, 226 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.05.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MARION, Nuclear Energy Institute, Letter to to H. N. BERKOW, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Topical Report TR-1002865, “Topical Report on Reactivity Initiated Accidents: Bases for RIA Fuel Rod Failures and Core Coolability Criteria” (June 13, 2006); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0616/ML061650107.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• J. TURNBULL, “An Empirical Model of UO2 Thermal Conductivity Based on Laser Flash Measurements of Thermal Diffusivity,” TR-111347, Electric Power Research Institute (1998).
   Google Scholar
• K. OHIRA and N. ITAGAKI, “Thermal Conductivity Measurements of High Burnup UO2 Pellet and a Benchmark Calculation of Fuel Center Temperature,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance, Portland, Oregon, 1997, p. 541, American Nuclear Society (1997).
   Google Scholar
• J. KAMIMURA et al., “Thermal and Mechanical Behavior Modeling for High Burnup Fuel,” Proc. Water Reactor Fuel Performance Mtg., Seoul, Korea, 2008.
   Google Scholar